Daily Archives: March 16, 2021

N.D.Ohio: 911 call about attempted carjacking led to RS

“Under these circumstances, I find the 911 call contained sufficient indicia of reliability to support Carpenter’s belief in the facts alleged by the caller. Thus, Carpenter was justified in believing there was a man named Dominic, who owned a gun, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: 911 call about attempted carjacking led to RS

CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

The district court credited the dog handler that the dog alerted. “To the extent that Goldberg brings a legal challenge, this court has held that an alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.” United … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration checkpoints, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

“Bruno changed his argument on appeal. In the district court, he disputed the government’s factual representations supporting the search of his apartment. On appeal, he no longer argues that the search warrant application contained factual inaccuracies or material omissions. Rather, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not calling defendant to testify at the suppression hearing to avoid potential further admissions of guilt [What about Simmons v. United States and its “immunity”?], and defense counsel was confident standing was shown. Moreover, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

KY: Trial court has no duty to suppress without defense objection

The trial court has no duty to sua sponte suppress when the defense makes no objection. It also isn’t plain error. Gardner v. Commonwealth, 2021 Ky. App. LEXIS 23 (Mar. 12, 2021) (unpublished):

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on KY: Trial court has no duty to suppress without defense objection