Daily Archives: March 18, 2021

VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military

VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military by Joseph Cox (“15 billion car locations. Nearly any country on Earth. ‘The Ulysses Group’ is pitching a powerful surveillance technology to the U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military

S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

In a child in need of services case, a well pled Franks violation can state a claim, but this one wasn’t. Grullon v. Administrator for Children’s Services, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49614 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021) (recognizing rule; citing Estiverne … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

W.D.N.Y.: Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook SW wasn’t fatal to search

Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook warrant wasn’t fatal and did not require exclusion. United States v. Vogelbacher, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49359 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2021), adopted 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48228 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook SW wasn’t fatal to search

E.D.Mich.: Govt’s violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 has no exclusionary remedy; that’s for const’l violations

In an opiod over prescribing case, a government violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 by the government only leads to a fine against the offending person. The exclusionary rule does not apply to regulation violations. United States v. Pompy, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Govt’s violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 has no exclusionary remedy; that’s for const’l violations

CA5: RS for immigration stop was based on location and officer’s experience

“The Government argues, and we agree, that the totality of the circumstances here support a finding that Agent Stauffiger had reasonable suspicion to justify stopping Nelson’s vehicle. First, our Court has recognized that proximity to the border is ‘a paramount … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: RS for immigration stop was based on location and officer’s experience

CA5: Anonymous tip wasn’t sufficiently corroborated

The anonymous tip here wasn’t sufficiently corroborated to make reasonable suspicion. The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion. United States v. Norbert, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7620 (5th Cir. Mar. 16, 2021) (2-1):

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Anonymous tip wasn’t sufficiently corroborated

W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant had a duty to address the good faith exception in his motion and amended motion to suppress a search under a warrant, but he did not. United States v. Lyons, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48780 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

NC: DUI checkpoint had programmatic purpose

The state proved a valid programmatic purpose for its driver’s license and DUI checkpoint. State v. Macke, 2021-NCCOA-70, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 16, 2021). Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging defendant’s stop because there was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: DUI checkpoint had programmatic purpose