Category Archives: Reasonableness

C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

“‘The mere occurrence of a firearm seizure during a traffic stop, however, is not enough to establish a Second Amendment violation. Police seize and confiscate firearms routinely, and this Court will not presume that each and every one of those … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

NY Nassau: Questions in ER about drug and alcohol use not “pedigree questions”

Questions at the hospital about drug or alcohol use are not “pedigree questions” because they go to the heart of the investigation. People v. Jeffcoat, 2023 NY Slip Op 50306(U), 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1549 (Nassau Co. Apr. 7, 2023).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY Nassau: Questions in ER about drug and alcohol use not “pedigree questions”

CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

Mental health seizures under Florida’s Baker Act comply with the Fourth Amendment when it’s objectively reasonable to believe that the person is a danger to himself or others. Here the officers had that from defendant’s threats to shoot people. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

Murder case: A highway checkpoint with four officers to check DLs, registration, and insurance was valid under Prouse, Sitz, and Edmund. No suggestion it was for general crime control. State v. Jones, 2023 S.C. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 29, 2023). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Roadblocks, Standing | Comments Off on SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

W.D.N.C.: Traffic stop for expired tags went right to criminal history and was overlong

The court adopts the R&R and finds that the traffic stop was initially justified, but the officer got way off track from it into investigating other things without reasonable suspicion. Instead, the officer was investigating defendant’s criminal history for 46 … Continue reading →

Posted in Open fields, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Traffic stop for expired tags went right to criminal history and was overlong

ID rejects “reasonable mistake of law” and Heien under state constitution; state’s exclusionary rule is broader

Idaho declines to adopt the “reasonable mistake of law” rule and suppresses a search incident to a warrantless arrest for a completed misdemeanor. The state’s exclusionary rule isn’t just to deter illegal police misconduct – it is considerably more, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on ID rejects “reasonable mistake of law” and Heien under state constitution; state’s exclusionary rule is broader

CA10: Five seconds is de minimus under Rodriguez

In a short per curiam, the Tenth Circuit upholds a dog sniff under Rodriguez without explanation. The concurrence, however, tells us that the stop was extended five seconds past the “Rodriguez moment” as still reasonable. United States v. Hayes, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Five seconds is de minimus under Rodriguez

CA9: Two questions about weapons in car was for officer safety and not unreasonable

Twice asking defendant during a traffic stop about weapons was not minimally burdensome and not unreasonable when defendant had prior for weapons. United States v. Taylor, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 4954 (9th Cir. Mar. 1, 2023):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Two questions about weapons in car was for officer safety and not unreasonable

WI: REP in apt building’s storage room def shared with another that she put the lock on

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in an apartment’s basement storage room that was shared with another but which defendant put a padlock on. State v. Eder, 2023 Wisc. App. LEXIS 207 (Feb. 28, 2023). There was probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on WI: REP in apt building’s storage room def shared with another that she put the lock on

CA10: No fixed time to write the ticket under Rodriguez

The traffic stop was justified, and the district court was correct in holding what happened during the ticket writing phase didn’t deviate from the primary mission of the stop. There’s no fixed rule on the amount of time it could … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: No fixed time to write the ticket under Rodriguez

CA9: Denying owner access to an impounded car for 30 days is an unreasonable seizure

Denying access to one’s car for 30 days after impoundment without justification was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Untalan v. Stanley, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 4070 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2023). CI information led to surveillance then two … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Denying owner access to an impounded car for 30 days is an unreasonable seizure

KY: SW not required for medical question answers at book-in

Defendant had only a limited privacy interest in his medical records from questions asked during the book-in process at jail. Getting his medical information was incident to his detention for his arrest for a fatal collision that killed a police … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: SW not required for medical question answers at book-in

W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

An unreasonable 108-day delay in retrieving defendant’s cell phone from local police after the DEA adopted the case required suppression of the search of the phone. United States v. Adams, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23973 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2023). Officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 108-day delay in SW for cell phone was unreasonable

E.D.Va.: No 4A right to notice before a search occurs; state search law inapplicable in federal court

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim is that he was given no notice that his phones had been searched, citing Virginia law, which is irrelevant in a federal prosecution, even though state officials did all the searching. There’s no constitutional right to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No 4A right to notice before a search occurs; state search law inapplicable in federal court

CA11: Stop on RS can’t go on indef

A stop on reasonable suspicion cannot go on indefinitely. Here, there was video of an encounter but defendant deleted it from the phone of the victim. She’d sent it to another before that, and she was trying to get it … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Stop on RS can’t go on indef

GA: Sound of shuffling of feet after announcement of raid justified entry in 3 seconds; no weapons found

Officers entered within about three seconds after announcing and hearing shuffling of feet. Defendant was sitting on the couch, and there were no firearms. The test is whether there is a reasonable possible fear of firearms in the house that … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: Sound of shuffling of feet after announcement of raid justified entry in 3 seconds; no weapons found

KY: 21-month delay for SW for cell phone not unreasonable where def in custody

Officers had probable cause and nexus and showed particularity to defendant’s cell phone. He’d previously been accused of recording undressed women and was involved in an upskirting. Here he’d been accused of sex with drugged women and recording some of … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: 21-month delay for SW for cell phone not unreasonable where def in custody

CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

Officer’s failure to turn on his bodycam before frisk here doesn’t require an adverse inference of destruction of evidence. Bad faith isn’t shown. United States v. Aguirre-Cuenca, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105 (4th Cir. Jan. 18, 2023). Defendant’s appeal is … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

The officer’s stop of plaintiff to flirt with her was without basis and thus unreasonable, and clearly established. Shepherd v. Robbins, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 36056 (10th Cir. Dec. 13, 2022) [corrected Dec. 28, 2022]. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

GA: Generalizations and experience do not support no-knock warrant

The no-knock provision in this search warrant was not based on a showing of necessity based on this case. It was based on experience and generalities. [In addition, defendant was supposedly standing in the front yard, so what about the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on GA: Generalizations and experience do not support no-knock warrant