Category Archives: Reasonableness

CA7 (en banc): Questions about travel plans during traffic stop not unreasonable

Resolving an apparent conflict between Rodriguez and pre-Rodriguez case law, the officer’s normal inquiries here about defendant’s travel plans were legitimate and produced answers that he could legitimately doubt. Defendant volunteered seven states other than where the stop occurred, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7 (en banc): Questions about travel plans during traffic stop not unreasonable

KY: Seeking consent to search car by threatening to use drug dog unreasonably extended stop

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, but the officer readily abandoned it by seeking consent and “repeatedly threatened the use of a dog sniff” if he didn’t. Commonwealth v. Conner, 2021 Ky. LEXIS 419 (Dec. 16, 2021):

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Seeking consent to search car by threatening to use drug dog unreasonably extended stop

NC: This traffic stop was not based on an objectively reasonable view of statute; stop suppressed

The officer’s mistaken view of the law allegedly justifying the stop was not objectively reasonable under Heien and thus completely without reasonable suspicion. State v. Jonas, 2021-NCCOA-660, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 678 (Dec. 7, 2021). This probation search was valid: … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: This traffic stop was not based on an objectively reasonable view of statute; stop suppressed

LA1: Subjective beliefs of officer irrelevant when PC exists

The trial court is reversed. There was probable cause for defendant’s stop. “Under the law, ‘the subjective beliefs or expectations of the detaining officer’ are irrelevant.” State v. Lee, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 1840 (La. App. 1 Cir. Dec. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: Subjective beliefs of officer irrelevant when PC exists

CA1: Protective sweep for weapons requires only objective reasonableness, and actual fear not required

A First Circuit panel overrules its caselaw as inconsistent with SCOTUS cases that a frisk for weapons must be both objective and with subjective fear: “United States v. Lott that officers cannot do a ‘frisk for weapons … where, although … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA1: Protective sweep for weapons requires only objective reasonableness, and actual fear not required

N.D.Ill.: Evil intent irrelevant in excessive force case if it all still objectively reasonable

“Issues of motive and intent are essentially irrelevant in [an excessive force] case. The test in an excessive force case is an objective one. Thus, ‘[a]n officer’s evil intentions will not make a Fourth Amendment violation out of an objectively … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Evil intent irrelevant in excessive force case if it all still objectively reasonable

N.D.Ga.: Failure to record videoconference SW application under state law not 4A violation

Georgia has allowed video conferencing search warrant application for years. The statute requires a recording, but the federal courts have never held that a failure to record violates the Fourth Amendment when a state search warrant ends up in federal … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Failure to record videoconference SW application under state law not 4A violation

WA: No REP in text message exchange

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages exchanged with another, even under the state’s more protective constitution of “private affairs.” State v. Pouncy, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 2811 (Nov. 30, 2021) (unpublished).* The reasonableness of a traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on WA: No REP in text message exchange

N.D.Ind.: Arrestee left out in cold in t-shirt stated 4A claim

Plaintiff states a Fourth Amendment claim that he was arrested and left outside in the snow in jeans and a t-shirt for more than 30 minutes. Bolin v. Prater, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225777 (N.D.Ind. Nov. 23, 2021). Leaving drugs … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Arrestee left out in cold in t-shirt stated 4A claim

LA1: SW not required under automobile exception

Defendant was involved in a struggle with another in a car, and he reached for the console to open it, and a gun was briefly visible. When he was finally arrested, a warrant was not required for search of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: SW not required under automobile exception

S.D.N.Y.: 10-14 month old information sought on cell phone SW in fraud case wasn’t stale

Defendant’s car was stopped for no front license plate, and he was found to be without a valid DL. The car was towed to the 44th Precinct and inventoried, and two cell phones were seized. An officer at another precinct … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: 10-14 month old information sought on cell phone SW in fraud case wasn’t stale

CA6: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.”

As to probable cause: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.” Allen v. City of Ecorse, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 34348 (6th Cir. Nov. 18, 2021). Defendant’s guilty plea included a comprehensive … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: “The Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to be right, only to be reasonable.”

D.N.M.: DEA can make a traffic stop under 4A

It is not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment for a DEA agent to stop a car on state highways for an alleged traffic violation. There was probable cause for an automobile exception search. United States v. Vallejos, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.M.: DEA can make a traffic stop under 4A

W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

The good faith exception is here directly applied to a warrantless stop and resulting search because of a “reasonable” mistake of law. United States v. McBroom, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215219 (W.D.Pa. Nov. 8. 2021):

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: GFE applies to warrantless stop based on reasonable mistake of fact

UT: DNA SW can be executed by force; def has burden of showing unreasonable force was used to execute a DNA warrant on his person

A search warrant was issued for defendant’s DNA, and he resisted efforts to take it by buccal swab. He doesn’t challenge the probable cause, only the method of execution. He carries the burden of proof on the question of unreasonableness … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, DNA, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: DNA SW can be executed by force; def has burden of showing unreasonable force was used to execute a DNA warrant on his person

W.D.N.Y.: Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a SW required by NY law is not a 4A issue

Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a search warrant as required by New York law is not a Fourth Amendment issue. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212869 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2021). “Recognizing that this case … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a SW required by NY law is not a 4A issue

CA9: State’s seeking CSLI with PC but under wrong statute not 4A violation

Probable cause was shown for CSLI before the state judge, but the state sought the order under the wrong statute. That doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Fregia, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 32587 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 2021). … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: State’s seeking CSLI with PC but under wrong statute not 4A violation

N.D.Ohio: Providing the wrong rental agreement for the car led to more questions and then RS

“[I]t was reasonable for Trooper Burgett to suspect that criminal conduct was afoot. The stop was initially for a mere traffic infraction, but when Defendant Sanders provided the wrong rental agreement, things shifted. The incorrect rental agreement was a catalyst … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Providing the wrong rental agreement for the car led to more questions and then RS

N.D.Ohio: Frisk just for “officer safety” during traffic stop was unreasonable

Defendant was stopped for having no rearview mirror inside. A frisk for weapons for “officer safety” was unwarranted. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Jarvis, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199592 (N.D.Ohio Oct. 18, 2021). The officer’s alleged violation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Frisk just for “officer safety” during traffic stop was unreasonable

W.D.Ark.: Scar on defendant’s thumb could be photographed on booking

During fingerprinting on defendant’s arrest when he came in with defense counsel, DHS officers noticed a scar on his thumb, and they photographed it as a part of the identification process. This violated neither the Fourth or Sixth Amendment under … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Scar on defendant’s thumb could be photographed on booking