Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA8: Even if def’s Mexican confession was obtained by alleged torture, the UN Convention Against Torture doesn’t have a suppression remedy

Defendant was arrested in Mexico and subjected to searches and interrogation which he claimed amounted to torture. Relying on the United Nations Convention Against Torture, he contended it shocked the conscience. There is no authority for the CAT to apply … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Even if def’s Mexican confession was obtained by alleged torture, the UN Convention Against Torture doesn’t have a suppression remedy

E.D.Pa.: Dismissal not the remedy for a 4A violation

“But in any event, even where Fourth Amendment violations have occurred—which, the Court takes pains to restate, is not the case here—a dismissal of an indictment is generally not the appropriate remedy. United States v. Morrison, 449 U.S. 361, 365-66, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Dismissal not the remedy for a 4A violation

MD: Withdrawal of consent to computer search extended to copy of hard drive police made

“[D]efendant had reasonable expectation of privacy in data stored on his laptop’s hard drive, whether data was electronically stored on his hard drive or government’s copy of hard drive made with defendant’s consent. Defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy was not … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Withdrawal of consent to computer search extended to copy of hard drive police made

S.D.Iowa: Accosting a person carrying a gun in an open carry state lacked RS

After Iowa permitted open carry, accosting defendant for carrying a firearm lacked reasonable suspicion. United States v. McMillion, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117283 (S.D. Iowa June 30, 2023). The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone permitted a search by use … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Iowa: Accosting a person carrying a gun in an open carry state lacked RS

E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

Leaving the wrong search warrant at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress. United States v. Major, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116569 (E.D. La. July 7, 2023). The CI had no track record, but his story … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

CADC: In the RS calculus, the officer’s experience has significant value

In the reasonable suspicion calculus, the officer’s experience has value. United States v. Douglas, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 17171 (D.C. Cir. July 7, 2023) (per curiam, but 2-1), Randolph, J., concurring:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CADC: In the RS calculus, the officer’s experience has significant value

E.D.Mich.: The tip was anonymous, but it was corroborated by investigation

The initial tip about defendant being a drug dealer was anonymous, but officers investigated to corroborate it. “Detectives went to the address associated with the phone number provided by the anonymous source, observed activity which they believed was consistent with … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: The tip was anonymous, but it was corroborated by investigation

OH12: Protective sweeps didn’t require consent

The protective sweep didn’t require consent. Moreover, the argument wasn’t preserve below. State v. Mott, 2023-Ohio-2268 (12th Dist. July 3, 2023).* Based on the totality, it was objectively reasonable to believe defendant was speeding when the officer decided to stop … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Immigration arrests, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH12: Protective sweeps didn’t require consent

D.P.R.: Indicted fugitive can have standing in a place even using an alias

Defendant being an unindicted fugitive using a false name still had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place he was staying. This is different from the government’s authority involving convicted escapees. United States v. Cotto-Cruz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Indicted fugitive can have standing in a place even using an alias

D.Mont.: Nervousness alone not enough to extend stop

Defendant’s stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. A DL and EPIC check on both driver and passenger came up clean, and the stop should have ended then. Nervousness alone wasn’t enough. United States v. Funk, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Nervousness alone not enough to extend stop

OH4: Entry to recover AR-15 was reasonable, even though it was hard to find

Officers responding to a 911 call were told there was an unsecured AR-15 in the house. The entry to retrieve it was reasonable, and Caniglia v. Strom is distinguishable. State v. Pine, 2023-Ohio-2191, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2166 (4th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Entry to recover AR-15 was reasonable, even though it was hard to find

TX1: 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette

A 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette. Small v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 4610 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) June 29, 2023)* (unpublished) “These events establish probable cause, especially when … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette

CA7: Claim of excessive force in arrest by federal agent does not state new type of Bivens claim

A claim of excessive force during an arrest by a federal agent does not state a new type of Bivens claim, and it can proceed. Snowden v. Henning, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 16221 (7th Cir. June 27, 2023). (This was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA7: Claim of excessive force in arrest by federal agent does not state new type of Bivens claim

GA: Refusal to consent to taking a DNA swab in a rape investigation is admissible at trial

Defendant’s refusal to consent to taking a DNA swab in a rape investigation is admissible at trial. Post-arrest cheek swabs do not violate the Fourth Amendment because they are accepted police booking and jailing procedures, similar to fingerprinting and photographing. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Refusal to consent to taking a DNA swab in a rape investigation is admissible at trial

MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

When defendant’s backpack was abandoned, that included sealed packages inside it. State v. Fernandez, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 461 (June 27, 2023). “Nonetheless, the Durham Court’s general statement, that having a roommate does not convert a single-family house into a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

A bank employee saw a van parked on the bank’s lot that had been there overnight. Officers responded and saw an assault rifle in the passenger compartment. “Around 12:30 [p.m.], without knocking or announcing their presence, Lambert and Wagner pulled … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

Law enforcement officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target. “However, in reviewing a search warrant for probable cause, a court is ‘to look holistically at what the affidavit does show, instead … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

“In contrast, here the State established that Maverick was a certified drug sniffing dog with a history of reliability. Maverick’s behavior, even without a full final response of sitting, was sufficient to indicate that he had detected the odors of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

The search warrant might appear general, but it was limited by the things to be searched for. The reference to “trace evidence including but not limited to blood, hair, fibers, fluids, and fingerprints” did not make it unparticular. Trace evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

OH1: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

The exclusionary rule applies only to constitutional violations, not statutory, and a violation of the probation search statute is not subject to exclusion. State v. Borger, 2023-Ohio-2025, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2044 (1st Dist. June 21, 2023). “While we note … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations