D.Mont.: Nervousness alone not enough to extend stop

Defendant’s stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. A DL and EPIC check on both driver and passenger came up clean, and the stop should have ended then. Nervousness alone wasn’t enough. United States v. Funk, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112761 (D.Mont. June 29, 2023).*

“So, Sgt. McGill needed something more than O’Meara’s nervousness to have reasonable suspicion that O’Meara was committing drug crimes. Reasonable suspicion is a low bar. … It ‘requires only that the officer have a ‘moderate chance’ of finding evidence of illegality on further investigation.’” Defendant was also slow to answer questions like he was making it up as he was going along. United States v. O’Meara, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112768 (N.D. Ohio June 28, 2023).*

The search warrant failed to properly identify the cell phone to be searched, and the motion to suppress is granted. People v. Jackson, 2023 NY Slip Op 50640(U), 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3126, 2023 NYLJ LEXIS 1575 (Kings Co. June 26, 2023) (unpublished).*

Plaintiff showed enough to go to discovery on an FTCA claim, but not a Bivens claim against individual officers who are dismissed out. Quiñonez v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112706 (N.D. Cal. June 29, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.