Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

TX6: Def abandoned cell phone; PC for SW didn’t matter

Defendant abandoned his cell phone, and then the police got a warrant for it. Still, it’s abandonment. Williams v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5777 (Tex. App. – Texarkana Aug. 5, 2025).* The evidence supported the district court’s conclusion there … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on TX6: Def abandoned cell phone; PC for SW didn’t matter

CA8: Post-Rodriguez, criminal history is still a relevant inquiry during a traffic stop as RS develops

Post-Rodriguez, criminal history is still a relevant inquiry during a traffic stop as reasonable suspicion develops. United States v. Moua, 24-2774 (8th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025) (2-1):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA8: Post-Rodriguez, criminal history is still a relevant inquiry during a traffic stop as RS develops

CA8 denies en banc 9-2 on a Rodriguez issue

The Eighth Circuit denies rehearing en banc in a Rodriguez case [remember Rodriguez came from the Eighth Circuit] with two dissenters: United States v. Puckett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19064 (8th Cir. July 29, 2025), Grasz with Kelly dissenting:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA8 denies en banc 9-2 on a Rodriguez issue

CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

The officer had reasonable suspicion that the owner of the vehicle had a suspended DL, but that dissipated when he saw the driver wasn’t the same gender as the owner. But, reasonable suspicion was developing the driver was under the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

S.D.Cal.: Def doesn’t get discovery of cell phone govt hasn’t decrypted

When the government seizes a cell phone under a warrant and the data is encrypted and it can’t see it, it is not in “possession” for Rule 16 discovery purposes. United States v. Mejia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142962 (S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Discovery, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Def doesn’t get discovery of cell phone govt hasn’t decrypted

CA6: Govt. waived PC argument, but GFE carries the day

The government waived reliance on probable cause in the district court, but its good faith exception was presented and supports the search. United States v. Scales, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18324 (6th Cir. July 21, 2025).* The magistrate’s R&R finding … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Govt. waived PC argument, but GFE carries the day

OH6: Refusing consent to search cell phone can’t be sentencing aggravator

Defendant had a constitutional right to refuse consent to search his cell phone, and the trial court erred by considering that as an aggravating factor in sentencing. State v. Dawes, 2025-Ohio-2576, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 2500 (6th Dist. July 22, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: Refusing consent to search cell phone can’t be sentencing aggravator

OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

The granting of the motion to suppress is reversed as not based on competent or credible evidence. The bodycam doesn’t fully support the officer’s testimony there were furtive movements before he got up to the driver’s window, but the bodycam … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

CA9: Untimely post-trial motion to suppress not even considered on appeal

“Ellis also argues that the police officers’ search of his rental car resulted from an unconstitutionally prolonged traffic stop and was unsupported by probable cause. He pressed this claim in a post-trial motion that was untimely under Federal Rule of … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Untimely post-trial motion to suppress not even considered on appeal

N.D.Ohio: Abandonment in flight from arrest under alleged illegal warrant still abandonment

Fleeing an arrest under what is now alleged to be an invalid warrant and abandoning property is still abandonment. United States v. Pool, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138465 (N.D. Ohio July 21, 2025). There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Abandonment in flight from arrest under alleged illegal warrant still abandonment

D.Mass.: Being a longtime member of a group that shared CP supported PC for defendant’s devices

“Given the length of Estrada’s membership in the two groups, the volume of files depicting child pornography shared during Estrada’s membership, and the detailed description of a file shared while Estrada was a participant in one of the groups, the … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Being a longtime member of a group that shared CP supported PC for defendant’s devices

C.D.Cal. denies stay in immigration stops without RS

Perdomo v. Noem, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137993 (C.D. Cal. July 17, 2025), posted here, holds that reasonable suspicion is required for immigration stops and race alone isn’t enough. The government’s motion for stay pending appeal is denied. Without more … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal. denies stay in immigration stops without RS

DC: Flight even in a high crime area isn’t RS

Relying on the en banc opinion in Mayo v. United States, 315 A.3d 606 (D.C. 2024), flight in a high-crime area is not reasonable suspicion. People flee to avoid unnecessary confrontation with the police, who just might be potentially too … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Flight even in a high crime area isn’t RS

CA7: Lifting mattress during protective sweep here wasn’t justified

The protective sweep under a mattress here was unjustified. Protective sweeps have to be based on known facts, not theories. Here, without deciding whether it was justified, on this record, lifting a mattress was unreasonable. There was no reason to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Lifting mattress during protective sweep here wasn’t justified

C.D.Cal.: Roving immigration patrol stops without RS violate 4A

“Roving patrols without reasonable suspicion violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and denying access to lawyers violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. What the federal government would have this Court believe—in the face of a mountain of evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Roving immigration patrol stops without RS violate 4A

E.D.La.: Use of translation app to communicate with def slowed the stop, but didn’t make it unreasonable

The officer’s use of a translation app on his cell phone to communicate with defendant didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. If limited questions can be asked, then logically an app can translate. Here, cell coverage was limited so that slowed … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Foreign searches, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Use of translation app to communicate with def slowed the stop, but didn’t make it unreasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Abandoning three large dogs to flee is more than just “mere refusal to cooperate”

“At the very least, leaving three large dogs effectively unrestrained in a public place to flee from law enforcement certainly amounts to more than the ‘mere refusal to cooperate’ that is protected by the Fourth Amendment. Cf. [Wardlow, 528 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Abandoning three large dogs to flee is more than just “mere refusal to cooperate”

W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

The unidentified tipster was corroborated by defendant’s hand-to-hand transactions during surveillance, and that was probable cause. United States v. Mangol, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130023 (W.D. Mo. May 23, 2025). Defendant sought to use the GPS information on his trailer … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

On de novo review, the officers didn’t slow walk the traffic citation to get more time to do the dog sniff. State v. Cox, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 567 (July 2, 2025)*:

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

OH12: Adoption of suppression motion brief by reference on appeal is waiver

Adoption of his suppression motion brief by reference without briefing it was waiver. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation with his girlfriend in the presence of a CI. State v. Davis, 2025-Ohio-2382, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: Adoption of suppression motion brief by reference on appeal is waiver