CA5: A trespasser has no REP

A trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy when on the property trespassed upon. Here, there were numerous signs for the TX DOT saying “no trespassing.” United States v. Parkerson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26220 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2025).

As a part of the reasonable suspicion calculation for a driving offense, the officer can consider the incidence of DUIs that happen along this stretch of road down from a couple of bars when erratic driving happens after midnight. Parker v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7755 (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2025).*

“Defendant’s Franks hearing motion alleges that the search warrant affidavits failed to demonstrate probable cause and support issuance of the search warrants in question. … Defendant explains, ‘certain omissions in the contested search warrants further show that there was not probable cause for either search warrant to be issued.’ Id. Specifically, Defendant contends that the affidavits lacked information about the confidential informants’ backgrounds. … Defendant does not point to any specific affidavit or search warrant. See id. Defendant also does not provide any exhibits or affidavits to support his assertion. …” Denied. United States v. Busbee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199344 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 8, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.