Category Archives: Franks doctrine

AR: Adding to PC argument on appeal wasn’t preserved

Defendant’s specific argument on appeal about the lack of probable cause was not presented to the trial court, so it’s not preserved for appeal. In a Franks part of the motion, the affidavit has to be read as a whole, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Adding to PC argument on appeal wasn’t preserved

CA4: Not every fact an affiant knows needs to go in a SW affidavit for Franks

The omission of some facts didn’t make out a Franks violation. Affiants for search warrants are not required to itemize every fact they know and omission of some, the nonmaterial, doesn’t make out a Franks violation nor undermine the probable … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: Not every fact an affiant knows needs to go in a SW affidavit for Franks

S.D.Ill.: Rule 41(g) doesn’t permit return of property held by state officers

“As this Court has tried to explain several times, the property Turner seeks is held by the Illinois State Police–not the Federal Government. The Court cannot order the Government to return something that it does not have. For these reasons, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Rule 41(g) doesn’t permit return of property held by state officers

D.Md.: Despite recreational MJ use in state, smell of MJ before that was PC

At the time of the encounter with the Maryland police, the smell of marijuana on the person was probable cause. That changed later, but the search of the person was valid when it happened. Moreover, possession of marijuana is still … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Md.: Despite recreational MJ use in state, smell of MJ before that was PC

CA4: The rental search was prior to Byrd making it unreasonable; Davis good faith applies

Search of a rental car before Byrd that subsequently made it unreasonable gets the benefit of the good faith exception. United States v. Houston, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 1643 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2021). There were material omissions from the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: The rental search was prior to Byrd making it unreasonable; Davis good faith applies

N.D.Ill.: Arrest warrant doesn’t permit a search on entry

Defendant’s arrest warrant permitted entry to arrest him but not to search. A protective sweep was still permitted, if justified. Here no. But the search warrant for the cell phone was not tainted by the initial illegality, and the exclusionary … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Arrest warrant doesn’t permit a search on entry

CA10: Weaknesses in the PC for Franks should be disclosed

Plaintiff failed to show a Franks violation in the affidavit for warrant. “To be sure, if the affiant for a warrant possesses information that would cast substantial doubt on the existence of probable cause, that information should not be intentionally … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Weaknesses in the PC for Franks should be disclosed

CA10: Code enforcement officer coming to ptf’s door to talk to him didn’t violate curtilage

A city code enforcement officer who came to plaintiff’s door for a couple of minutes to attempt to talk to him about a sign code violation did not violate the curtilage. Clark v. City of Williamsburg, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA10: Code enforcement officer coming to ptf’s door to talk to him didn’t violate curtilage

CA8: Creighton U. security officers are private actors

Creighton University security officers are private actors in seizing and searching defendant. They did not act in concert with any law enforcement agency, and they called the police to take defendant away. United States v. Avalos, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Private search | Comments Off on CA8: Creighton U. security officers are private actors

N.D.Ind.: Franks challenge in PC clothing fails for no offer of proof

“At first glance, the Defendant’s motion does not appear to be a true Franks hearing request as it does not appear to contest the veracity of the statements of the affiant or assert that she made false allegations. Rather, it … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Franks challenge in PC clothing fails for no offer of proof

CA6: Def waived Franks argument on appeal by only arguing PC below

Defendant’s Franks argument on appeal fails because the motion to suppress was based on a lack of probable cause and didn’t direct the court to any alleged false statement under Franks. United States v. Baker, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 113 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Def waived Franks argument on appeal by only arguing PC below

CA8: Remodeler found video voyeur camera and conducted a private search then turned it over to police

A man remodeling defendant’s house found a USB port in the bathroom, and he gathered that the USB could be used to hook up a camera in the bathroom to record children visiting there. He took the device he found … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Private search | Comments Off on CA8: Remodeler found video voyeur camera and conducted a private search then turned it over to police

OH6: CI was identified and admitted his culpability and that bolstered PC

“The fact that Chad was an identified informant and that his statements acted as an admission of his own criminal activity bolstered his credibility. This when viewed collectively with the other three instances of drug activity set forth in the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH6: CI was identified and admitted his culpability and that bolstered PC

CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

The military trial judge erred in concluding that the search authorization required AFOSI complete information to determine probable cause for defendant’s DNA in a sex assault case. It’s not. Just because there were differing versions of how dressed the victim … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

Just because evidence was seized with a search warrant doesn’t make it admissible. The rules of evidence or other statute or rule still have to be complied with. City of Fargo v. Hofer, 2020 ND 252, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 264 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

Probable cause for arrest because of planning to commit a drug crime based on corroborated CI information without the drug transaction even happening. United States v. Kristopher, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236421 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 16, 2020) [e.g., attempt, conspiracy]. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

“A substantial basis existed for the court to determine probable cause existed on the face of the warrant affidavit.” It was, however, sloppy and partly misleading, but, on the totality there is no Franks violation. United States v. Johnson, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW affidavit was sloppy and partly misleading, but not intentionally so

OH6: When lack of PC for a SW is the issue, a suppression hearing isn’t required: it’s a question of law

When the defendant moves to suppress a search warrant claiming only a lack of probable cause, a hearing isn’t required. It’s then a mixed question of law and fact (mostly law). State v. Holt, 2020-Ohio-6649, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4515 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH6: When lack of PC for a SW is the issue, a suppression hearing isn’t required: it’s a question of law

E.D.N.Y.: Valid strategic reasons for not using SW affidavit at trial

Defendant claimed perjury at trial because search warrant affidavits had information contrary to the trial testimony. There were good strategic reasons for not putting the affidavit in evidence. “Presumably, in deciding this claim, it is only appropriate to consider evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Valid strategic reasons for not using SW affidavit at trial

NY: Reversal for 4A violation isn’t “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claim

Reversal because of a Fourth Amendment violation isn’t a “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claims. Butler v. City of New York, 2020 NY Slip Op 33363(U), 2020 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 10130 (N.Y. Co. Oct. 14, 2020) (Martinez v. City of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: Reversal for 4A violation isn’t “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claim