Category Archives: Probable cause

CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

The district court credited the dog handler that the dog alerted. “To the extent that Goldberg brings a legal challenge, this court has held that an alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.” United … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration checkpoints, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette

The anonymous 911 call about flashing a gun at children satisfied Navarette. The officer was a mile from the place mentioned in the report and arrived shortly thereafter and saw the person the call reported. While the 911 caller could … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette

CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

The protective sweep finding defendant’s guns on execution of his arrest warrant was reasonable. Defendant does not show that the officers intentionally delayed his arrest with the purpose of exploiting a protective sweep. United States v. Cammon, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show arrest was delayed to facilitate better protective sweep

CA7: Claim of lack of PC for arrest not insulated from later review by a judicial finding of PC for trial

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim they were arrested without probable cause survives the state trial court finding enough to hold them for trial. “The Supreme Court held that a Fourth Amendment theory based on lack of probable cause survives a judicial … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Claim of lack of PC for arrest not insulated from later review by a judicial finding of PC for trial

GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

Failure to object on Fourth Amendment grounds at the agency level before the zoning board in a zoning administrative case was waiver for appeal. Forsyth County v. Mommies Props. LLC, 2021 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Mar. 11, 2021). “The first … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

CA6: No suppression remedy for no-knock violation

The remedy for a no-knock violation is not suppression of the evidence—it’s a § 1983 action for violating the Fourth Amendment. Moreover, “An issuing judge need not eliminate every alternative explanation to find a ‘fair probability’ that contraband will be … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: No suppression remedy for no-knock violation

M.D.Pa.: Tent in an open field might have had REP, but it was open to view inside and plain view applied

Assuming defendant’s tent in an “open field” area had a reasonable expectation of privacy (as the Ninth Circuit would hold), the tent was open and the officer could see in. There was no curtilage to the tent in an open … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Tent in an open field might have had REP, but it was open to view inside and plain view applied

OH1: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend a traffic stop

An officer’s order to get out of the car during a traffic stop does not expand the stop, and it is reasonable. Agreeing in the trial court that the stop was valid bars litigating it on appeal. State v. Jackson, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend a traffic stop

CA2: Three judges approved of these SWs, there was PC and GF

“Here, the state judge who issued the warrant interviewed the cooperating witness in camera. Two federal judges reviewed the state judge’s notes and also found probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. Hence, three judges independently found there was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Three judges approved of these SWs, there was PC and GF

E.D.Tenn.: Def wasn’t removed to avoid his being asked for consent under Randolph

The record doesn’t support defendant’s claim that he was removed to avoid his ability to object to consent under Randolph. In addition, his detention was otherwise objectively reasonable. United States v. Shaw, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35405 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def wasn’t removed to avoid his being asked for consent under Randolph

CA1: SWs are directed at places, too, and def didn’t need to be connected in the affidavit

Defendant made a Franks challenge. Removing the allegedly offending material still left probable cause. Defendant’s argument then was that the remainder still didn’t point to him, but that’s not the law: Search warrants are directed at places, too, not just … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA1: SWs are directed at places, too, and def didn’t need to be connected in the affidavit

PA: With MMJ, smell of MJ alone isn’t PC for search of a car; more required

Because of medical marijuana being law in Pennsylvania, the smell of marijuana in a car alone is no longer enough for probable cause. More is required. Commonwealth v. Grooms, 2021 Pa. Super. LEXIS 79 (Feb. 24, 2021):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: With MMJ, smell of MJ alone isn’t PC for search of a car; more required

GA: Contraband in plain view on def’s property didn’t justify warrantless entry to seize it

Officers’ entry onto abandoned property next door to defendant’s place to get a better view of his place was reasonable. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy there or in the view from there. However, they saw contraband in plain … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Contraband in plain view on def’s property didn’t justify warrantless entry to seize it

W.D.Mo.: No co-conspirator standing in GPS cell phone tracking

One co-conspirator has no standing in GPS tracking of his co-conspirator’s cell phone. The officers also had probable cause to search their car based on: knowledge they were cell phone store burglars, a Snapchat video with defendants having numerous cell … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause, Standing, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No co-conspirator standing in GPS cell phone tracking

HI: No PC shown for blood search warrant; no alcohol smell and disorientation was likely from head trauma

The state did not attempt to exhaust any possibilities that defendant’s disorientation wasn’t caused by likely head trauma because there was no probable cause otherwise that defendant had consumed alcohol. The search warrant for blood should not have issued. State … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on HI: No PC shown for blood search warrant; no alcohol smell and disorientation was likely from head trauma

OK Indian territory, McGirt v. Oklahoma, and the GFE

For a century, state officers investigated offenses on land that McGirt v. Oklahoma found were actually Indian lands. The good faith exception applies. The officer couldn’t have been expected to know that SCOTUS would finally hold as it did, and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OK Indian territory, McGirt v. Oklahoma, and the GFE

CA3: Warrant for roving wiretap didn’t have to call device a “cell site simulator” when it fully described it

The government obtained a roving wiretap for defendant’s cell phone with a cell site simulator. In the warrant application, they described in detail what a cell site simulator was, but it never said the words “cell site simulator.” It doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Cell site simulators, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Warrant for roving wiretap didn’t have to call device a “cell site simulator” when it fully described it

CA10: Failure to specify CI’s criminal history didn’t make affidavit “bare bones” or justify a Franks hearing

Defendant was suspected of thefts of equipment from oil fields. An Oklahoma state investigator applied for a GPS warrant for defendant’s vehicle. The warrant was issued on probable cause with nexus, and the good faith exception applies. “Smith argues on … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Failure to specify CI’s criminal history didn’t make affidavit “bare bones” or justify a Franks hearing

CA3: Failure to factually plead lack of PC or malice for a 4A malicious prosecution claim makes it fail

Karkalas v. Marks, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 3868 (3d Cir. Feb. 11, 2021):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Failure to factually plead lack of PC or malice for a 4A malicious prosecution claim makes it fail

D.N.M.: Tracing IP address to def does not require affiant exclude all other Internet users in area

Defendant was charged with stalking a former boss. A disguised email was traced by metadata to defendant’s router. His computer was searched, and the email was found. The question of probable cause for the search warrant does not require the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Tracing IP address to def does not require affiant exclude all other Internet users in area