Category Archives: Issue preclusion

CA6: Govt’s failure to argue standing below was mere “forfeiture” not “waiver”

The government can raise lack of standing for the first time on appeal unless it waived it below. At any rate, it can be reviewed for plain error. This also happened in United States v. Noble, 762 F.3d 509, 526-28 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Govt’s failure to argue standing below was mere “forfeiture” not “waiver”

W.D.Wis.: Guest of an overnight guest had standing, even where owner didn’t know

The guest of an overnight guest on the premises of the owner but without the owner’s knowledge had standing. “Defendants contend that Furdge had no legitimate privacy interest because he was in the home temporarily, lacked Rundle’s knowledge or consent, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Guest of an overnight guest had standing, even where owner didn’t know

W.D.Va.: Def’s resisting execution of a SW was a factor in finding dangerousness to deny release pending trial

Defendant’s resisting his arrest, including a search warrant, was a factor in denying release pending trial. United States v. Wagoner, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25232 (W.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2022). Questions of fact exist on whether plaintiff’s forced digital rectal exam … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Issue preclusion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Def’s resisting execution of a SW was a factor in finding dangerousness to deny release pending trial

E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in pawnshop records uploaded for the NYPD pawnshop detail. (Therefore, in the trial of this case, attacking the datamining of the NYPD for information is more prejudicial than relevant under F.R.E. 403.) Gem … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No REP in pawnshop records uploaded to pawnshop detail

E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

Plaintiff’s guilty plea in federal court was a waiver of his Fourth Amendment claims, and that was not judicial estoppel to a § 1983 case over the merits. Moreover, because the independent source doctrine was involved, the Heck bar did … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

A prosecutor is absolutely immune in presenting search warrant applications to a court. Miller v. Rivas, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22754 (D.N.J. Feb. 8, 2022). The affidavit for search warrant here was based on probable cause. The executing officers waited … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

NY4: State fails to prove independent source for search after unlawful arrest

The search of defendant’s car was the product of an illegal arrest, and the state fails to prove the independent source doctrine applies. Here, it was argued to be a parole search. People v. Smith, 2022 NY Slip Op 00790, … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: State fails to prove independent source for search after unlawful arrest

D.Conn.: No REP in pole camera surveillance of def’s business’s front door

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in two months of pole camera surveillance of his business front door. Society would not recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy of what’s visible from the public street. United States v. Harry, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Pole cameras, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Conn.: No REP in pole camera surveillance of def’s business’s front door

CA10: The specifics of the bag on Greyhound Bus search weren’t raised below, so waived

The specifics of defendant’s argument that his bag was handled on a Greyhound Bus in Albuquerque weren’t raised in the district court. His expansion of the issue on appeal was waived. United States v. Fernandez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3129 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: The specifics of the bag on Greyhound Bus search weren’t raised below, so waived

NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

Dismissal of a § 1983 excessive force case in federal court was not collateral estoppel for a state case under the state tort claims act. Hernandez v. Parker, 2022 N.M. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 1, 2022). Extending this stop was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Dismissal of § 1983 excessive force case was not collateral estoppel for a state tort claims act case

E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

Plaintiff operated a gym entered by the police for an administrative search during Covid when it should have been temporarily closed under a state executive order. They accessed it with a keycard from the prior owner who sold it years … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police entry into a commercial gym with an unauthorized keycard violated the owner’s REP

S.D.Ohio: There is no the state courts got it “really wrong” exception to Stone

“Paraphrased, this amounts to arguing that if the state courts got the Fourth Amendment issues really wrong, the habeas court can put Stone aside and decide the merits of the Fourth Amendment claims. [¶] Hashi cites no authority in support … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: There is no the state courts got it “really wrong” exception to Stone

MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

Plaintiff sued a prosecutor for various things including the “privacy tort ‘of unreasonable intrusion into private facts.’” His computer was searched under a warrant and potential privileged material was obtained. Plaintiff’s own complaint says the prosecutor was given the information … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MO: Prosecutor can’t be sued for making a file decision based on the search of ptf’s computer

D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

Plaintiff is an attorney pro se alleging, inter alia, a Fourth Amendment violation in Colorado against a member of the House of Representatives for the January 6th insurrection. He claims a Fourth Amendment in the “people’s house” when he doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Colo.: No REP in the “people’s house” on 1/6 because ptf wasn’t there

E.D.N.Y.: Complaint about co-def’s cell phone search was “specious,” and def doesn’t even have standing

Defendant’s claim the information about a co-conspirator’s phone search must be fabricated because that search warrant wasn’t in his discovery was “specious.” He doesn’t even have standing. Edwards v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14407 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2022).* … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Complaint about co-def’s cell phone search was “specious,” and def doesn’t even have standing

D.S.C.: On a 4th motion to keep SW materials under seal, granted for another year

On this fourth motion to extend deadline, the warrant materials here are ordered sealed for another year because of an ongoing investigation. The court finds redactions aren’t reasonably possible. In re Seized Misc. United States Currency, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.C.: On a 4th motion to keep SW materials under seal, granted for another year

CA3: Def’s immigration detention was not an egregious 4A violation

Defendant was involved in an immigration stop where officers were looking for another person allegedly illegally reentering. After finding he was not the person they were looking for, they tried to confirm his identity, and the detention might have been … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s immigration detention was not an egregious 4A violation

N.D.Ill.: Losing search issue in state court collaterally estops civil § 1983 case over same search

Collateral estoppel bars plaintiff’s suit against officers who arrested and searched him. He lost on the same search issue in state court, and that’s order is final. Bertaux v. Aurora Police Dep’t, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11260 (N.D.Ill. Jan. 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Losing search issue in state court collaterally estops civil § 1983 case over same search

D.Nev.: Private prison’s recording of attorney-client calls states a claim

A criminal defense lawyer stated a claim against a private prison operator under the wiretapping laws for recording attorney-client calls. Bliss v. Corecivic, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10953 (D.Nev. Jan. 18, 2022). 2254 petitioner’s illegal search claim barred by Stone. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Private search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Private prison’s recording of attorney-client calls states a claim

DE: Def counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Jones GPS case

“Because the Court will not find trial counsel ineffective for failing to ‘effectively’ raise an issue of first impression [on GPS placement], and because the Court believes that even if he had done so effectively, the issue would not have … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Jones GPS case