E.D.Va.: Guilty plea with waiver of 4A claim not judicial estoppel to § 1983 claim

Plaintiff’s guilty plea in federal court was a waiver of his Fourth Amendment claims, and that was not judicial estoppel to a § 1983 case over the merits. Moreover, because the independent source doctrine was involved, the Heck bar did not apply. Riley v. Pensabene, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23777 (E.D.Va. Feb. 8, 2022).

Rodriguez and Caballes were complied with because there was reasonable suspicion. “Officers Schanz and Lesesane had an objectively reasonable suspicion that Villanueva-Bautista was engaged in illegal activity when they asked if he had drugs in the car. He ran a red light in a high crime area. He was driving a car with a license plate from a state a long way from Philadelphia. He had nothing to show that he owned the car or was permitted to drive it; he produced a Hertz rental pamphlet, but no rental contract or other rental documents. He had no proof of insurance or registration information. He had no driver’s license or other proof of identification. The name and birthdate he gave the police could not be confirmed. All of this, combined with the informed assessments Officers Schanz and Lesesane made based on their training and experience, gave them reasonable suspicion that Villanueva-Bautista was up to no good and allowed them to expand the scope of their inquiry beyond the traffic violation.” United States v. Villanueva-Bautista, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23860 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 10, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.