NJ: SW including “all persons present or reasonably connected to the property” didn’t permit search of two men in car down street

Two men parked in a car down the street could not be searched under a warrant for nearby property with an “all persons present or reasonably connected to the property” clause. There was no way to connect them to the place to be searched. State v. Bivins, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 554 (April 20, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: SW including “all persons present or reasonably connected to the property” didn’t permit search of two men in car down street

CA2: When the subject of of an arrest warrant is in a third party’s house, Payton governs the entry as to him and Stegald as to the resident

When the subject of of an arrest warrant is in a third party’s house, Payton governs the entry as to him and Stegald as to the resident. This entry satisfied Payton, and the suppression order is reversed. United States v. Bohannon, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9789 (2d Cir. May 31, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA2: When the subject of of an arrest warrant is in a third party’s house, Payton governs the entry as to him and Stegald as to the resident

VT: A mere “home visit” of a probationer is reasonable and it does not include a search of the house

A mere “home visit” of a probationer is reasonable and it does not include a search of the house; merely an entry to look. State v. Levitt, 2016 VT 60, 2016 Vt. LEXIS 58 (May 27, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on VT: A mere “home visit” of a probationer is reasonable and it does not include a search of the house

NM: Opening car door that was too heavily tinted was reasonable for officer safety

It was reasonable for an officer in a DUI stop to open the defendant’s door for his own safety when the windows were tinted so darkly he couldn’t see inside. He also knocked on the window first. State v. Simpson, 2016 N.M. App. LEXIS 37 (May 19, 2016).

Assault rifles seen in defendant’s house when the police went in to get dry pants for him after he was arrested didn’t make it into the search warrant application, so it has no effect on the search warrant’s validity. United States v. Kemp, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70318 (E.D.Mich. May 31, 2016).*

Posted in Independent source, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NM: Opening car door that was too heavily tinted was reasonable for officer safety

D.D.C.: Joint venture doctrine is product of 4A, and citizens of another country prosecuted here for what happened there can’t claim it

Non-citizens cannot claim the joint venture doctrine in claiming an alleged Fourth Amendment violation in another country by the U.S. being on an alleged joint venture with the other country in a criminal investigation. In addition, the conduct doesn’t shock the conscience under that standard, either. United States v. Knowles, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178210 (D.D.C. Dec. 30, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Joint venture doctrine is product of 4A, and citizens of another country prosecuted here for what happened there can’t claim it

CA4 en banc: CSLI is mere third-party information not requiring SW

CSLI is third-party information the government does not need a warrant to obtain. 221 days worth of information was admissible. It’s up to Congress or SCOTUS to change the third-party doctrine. United States v. Graham, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9797 (4th Cir. May 31, 2016) (en banc):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA4 en banc: CSLI is mere third-party information not requiring SW

AK: Seizure of luggage and shipping back to Anchorage for dog sniff violated U.S. v. Place

When defendant arrived by plane to Dillingham, Alaska, officers, tipped off by a CI, asked for consent to search defendant’s suitcases for marijuana. He refused. They seized the suitcases and applied to a magistrate for a warrant. The magistrate said that the informant hearsay failed Aguilar-Spinelli, which is still the standard in Alaska. He invited them to get more information and present it again. Instead, the officers refused to return them, kept the suitcases, and shipped them to Anchorage on the morning plane so the Alaska State Troopers could do a dog sniff. A dog sniffed and alerted, and a warrant was issued on that. The motion to suppress should have been granted. Shipping the bags to Anchorage violated United States v. Place, and it was unreasonable to deprive defendant over his property for way so long. Telling him that he’d get them back eventually doesn’t make an unconstitutional seizure a constitutional one. Moore v. State, 2016 Alas. App. LEXIS 101 (May 27, 2016).

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on AK: Seizure of luggage and shipping back to Anchorage for dog sniff violated U.S. v. Place

N.D.Iowa: The fact two officers recollect the facts somewhat differently at suppression hearing doesn’t mean one or both are lying

That two officers recollect defendant’s traffic offense and stop somewhat differently doesn’t mean that one of them was lying. On the totality, there was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Maldonado, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67881 (N.D.Iowa May 24, 2016),* R&R 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52591 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 20, 2016).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant when they attempted to stop him, and he fled, disposing of things in the process which then gave probable cause. That was not a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Brown, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69176 (E.D.Mo. Mar. 31, 2016).*

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of proof | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: The fact two officers recollect the facts somewhat differently at suppression hearing doesn’t mean one or both are lying

E.D.Mich.: CP warrant not stale; in addition, even deleted files were subject to recovery

Ten months was not too old in a child pornography case to make the information stale. Even so, deleted files were potentially recoverable by forensic analysis of the computer. United States v. Pinchot, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67274 (E.D.Mich. April 28, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66485 (E.D. Mich. May 20, 2016).

Defendant was charged with Medicare fraud on information from MEDIC. “MEDIC is an entity ‘charged by the government to oversee the Medicare Part D drug benefit program and identify fraud[,] waste[,] and abuse.’” There was a search warrant for MEDIC information that ultimately expired. After a long analysis of the source of the information and the fact the government was not going to use anything from one MEDIC file at trial, the second MEDIC file has separate sourcing, and the motion is denied as moot. United States v. Barrett, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67718 (E.D.N.Y. May 23, 2016).*

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: CP warrant not stale; in addition, even deleted files were subject to recovery

IN: Passenger had no standing to challenge GPS warrant for car

Defendant was the passenger in a car that was operated by a person the police suspected was a serial burglar. They secured a GPS warrant, and they followed the car from a distance. They followed it to another county and saw that it was in parking lots in the middle of the night, maybe casing places to burgle. The two in the car were arrested. Defendant, a mere passenger in the car, had no standing to challenge GPS monitoring of the car under the Fourth Amendment or the Indiana Constituiton. It was owned by the co-defendant’s mother. Sidener v. State, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 173 (May 26, 2016).

Officers had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant at a public housing complex for loitering known from drugs and gun violence. When he was encountered, he was asked where he lived and pointed but he couldn’t give an address. His body language and posture suggested he was going to either fight or pull a weapon. His frisk was lawful and produced a gun. Mullen v. State, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 171 (May 25, 2016).*

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Passenger had no standing to challenge GPS warrant for car

AR: Officer’s personal knowledge def’s DL suspended is reasonable suspicion

The officer knew defendant and knew that defendant’s DL was suspended. That was reasonable suspicion for a stop. Medlock v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 282, 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 303 (May 25, 2016).*

Summarily affirmed based on recent precedent: “State v. Gackle, 2015 ND 271, ¶ 5, 871 N.W.2d 589 (stating ‘[t]his Court has previously determined, in the context of post-arrest chemical tests, that the state’s implied consent statute, which criminalizes refusal, is not coercive merely by the reading of the advisory.).” State v. Timm, 2016 ND 92, 2016 N.D. LEXIS 97 (May 26, 2016).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Officer’s personal knowledge def’s DL suspended is reasonable suspicion

N.D.Ind.: CI was adequately corroborated and predictive info proved correct

The CI had been working with the drug officers for four months, and his significant information had been significantly corroborated. He also accurately predicted that $400,000 would be packaged and shipped by defendant. That was probable cause. United States v. Norton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69177 (N.D. Ind. April 28, 2016).*

Defendant was stopped because the paper tag was in the back window. On closer inspection, it was out of date, and that justified continuing the stop. Clay v. State, 2016 WY 55, 2016 Wyo. LEXIS 59 (May 27, 2016).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: CI was adequately corroborated and predictive info proved correct

OH10: Plain view during consent search supported SW when consent withdrawn

Officers responding to a shots fired call asked defendant about a gun in his house. He denied there was one and consented to a search of the first floor. In the bathroom, officers saw crack cocaine in plain view. They asked about consent for the second floor, and defendant refused. They had probable cause to get a search warrant based on the consent search. State v. Walker, 2016-Ohio-3185, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2002 (10th Dist. May 26, 2016).

The fact that defendant smelled like marijuana was probable cause to search the car. Defendant said that he smelled like that before he got in the car, but that doesn’t negate probable cause. United States v. White, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178152 (D.Nev. Oct. 9, 2015).*

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH10: Plain view during consent search supported SW when consent withdrawn

D.Neb.: Protective sweep justified by arrest on weapons charges, somebody peeking through blinds, and sounds from inside

Officers executing an arrest warrant for weapons charges had reasonable suspicion for a protective sweep based on sounds from the basement and somebody peeking through the blinds. United States v. Alatorre, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69171 (D.Neb. May 26, 2016).

Officers surveilling a grow operation had information that an Asian male was coming and going but only staying a short time. Search warrants had been issued for other locations. When defendant was seen coming to one suspected grow, that was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Han, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67265 (D.Nev. Mar. 7, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67262 (D. Nev. May 23, 2016).*

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Protective sweep justified by arrest on weapons charges, somebody peeking through blinds, and sounds from inside

S.D.Ala.: No suppression hearing if defense doesn’t contradict govt’s assertions of fact

When the defendant doesn’t controvert the material facts in the government’s response to his motion to suppress, a hearing isn’t required because all the court has is to apply the law to the facts. United States v. Sledge, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68499 (S.D.Ala. May 25, 2016).

Sufficient nexus was shown between the arrest of a child pornographer in the Netherlands and search of his computer along with his admissions that he had traveled to defendant’s home about child pornography in Georgia and exchanged child porn. United States v. Nichols, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69230 (N.D.Ga. April 29, 2016).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: No suppression hearing if defense doesn’t contradict govt’s assertions of fact

N.D.Ga.: The question is PC for a SW, not what else officers could do to get more information; if they have PC, that’s all that’s required

The fact officers could have done more to validate their suspicions about a Facebook picture and who the child was and defendant and child pornography allegedly involving the same child, it isn’t constitutionally required if probable cause exists. United States v. Nichols, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68987 (N.D. Ga. May 26, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The question is PC for a SW, not what else officers could do to get more information; if they have PC, that’s all that’s required

SC: Where def avoided a DUI checkpoint, he couldn’t challenge its constitutionality

Where defendant was stopped because he avoided a checkpoint, the constitutionality of the checkpoint isn’t relevant to the appeal because there was no stop. An officer pursued and found the car parked with the lights off. Coming up to the window, the officer could smell alcohol on the driver. This “stop” was with reasonable suspicion. State v. Williams, 2016 S.C. App. LEXIS 50 (May 25, 2016).

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on SC: Where def avoided a DUI checkpoint, he couldn’t challenge its constitutionality

E.D.Ky.: No IAC from not challenging a search of some drugs where it wouldn’t even change def’s Sentencing Guideline range

Defendant’s post-conviction petition is denied. He argued that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search of his duffle bag during the search of a house by consent when he was an overnight guest. The merits don’t even have to be decided. The amount of drugs in the duffle bag was small compared to the wealth of other drugs defendant was responsible for, and, even if a motion to suppress was successful, defendant’s guideline range wouldn’t change. Therefore, he wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to do so, even if the argument was valid. United States v. Patterson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178120 (E.D.Ky. Nov. 2, 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: No IAC from not challenging a search of some drugs where it wouldn’t even change def’s Sentencing Guideline range

OR: Two on scope of consent, one suppressing drug paraphernalia found during a courthouse security check

Defendant put her purse through the x-ray at the security checkpoint into a juvenile court facility. There were signs warning about searches for weapons. The security officer opened her purse and found a spoon as drug paraphernalia. The consent was limited to the search for weapons and not for drug paraphernalia. State v. Winn, 278 Ore. App. 460, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 639 (May 25, 2016).

Defendant was the victim of an assault in a park, and he was separated from his backpack. When he got it back, the officer responding asked for consent to search it. To a reasonable person, this included consent to search a knotted plastic grocery bag found inside. Based on what defendant had just been through, there was no reason he’d think he was consenting to a search for drugs, too. State v. Blair, 278 Ore. App. 512, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 617 (May 25, 2016).

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OR: Two on scope of consent, one suppressing drug paraphernalia found during a courthouse security check

NYT: Dutch Firm Trains Eagles to Take Down High-Tech Prey: Drones

NYT: Dutch Firm Trains Eagles to Take Down High-Tech Prey: Drones by Stephen Castle

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on NYT: Dutch Firm Trains Eagles to Take Down High-Tech Prey: Drones