AR: Officer’s personal knowledge def’s DL suspended is reasonable suspicion

The officer knew defendant and knew that defendant’s DL was suspended. That was reasonable suspicion for a stop. Medlock v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 282, 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 303 (May 25, 2016).*

Summarily affirmed based on recent precedent: “State v. Gackle, 2015 ND 271, ¶ 5, 871 N.W.2d 589 (stating ‘[t]his Court has previously determined, in the context of post-arrest chemical tests, that the state’s implied consent statute, which criminalizes refusal, is not coercive merely by the reading of the advisory.).” State v. Timm, 2016 ND 92, 2016 N.D. LEXIS 97 (May 26, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.