M.D.La.: SW for examination of boat two years after alleged false BP spill claim for repairs not performed wasn’t stale

Defendant was suspected of making a fraudulent claim in the BP oil spill litigation claiming repairs on a boat. The government gathered information from others that strongly suggested that the boat was neither damaged nor repaired. The government finally applied for a search warrant two years after the claim was made. Defendant’s staleness argument fails. The condition of the boat now would show whether it had been repaired or not, and it had been seen in defendant’s driveway on a trailer all that time. The search warrant could be relied upon in good faith, so the court does not even need to consider probable cause [which there certainly appeared to be]. United States v. Anny, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67066 (M.D.La. May 23, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: SW for examination of boat two years after alleged false BP spill claim for repairs not performed wasn’t stale

GA: Forfeiture answer pleading illegal search and seizure has to plead facts

“Loveless also complains that the trial court erred by striking his Answer when he had raised therein a sufficient defense, namely that the search and seizure occurred in violation of the Fourth Amendment. However, the Answer did not include those factual disclosures that the statute required. … In the absence of a legally sufficient answer, the trial court was without authority to consider the suppression issue.” Loveless v. State, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 306 (May 27, 2016).

“[W]e find no error in the trial court’s finding that Officer Beretta had ‘extensive experience and expertise in performing speed estimations’ and we do not believe the estimate of 35 or 40 miles per hour in a 25 mile-per-hour zone was in ‘slight excess of the legal speed limit’ so as to foreclose a finding of reasonable suspicion based on the visual estimate.” People v. Nice, 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 428 (6th Dist. May 26, 2016).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Forfeiture answer pleading illegal search and seizure has to plead facts

WA: DUI probationer’s condition of random UAs was reasonable

A DUI probationer’s probation condition of random UAs was reasonable “to ensure compliance with a probation condition prohibiting the consumption of alcohol, marijuana, or non-prescribed drugs.” Trial court erred in setting the condition aside. State v. Olsen, 2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 1215 (May 24, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WA: DUI probationer’s condition of random UAs was reasonable

CA11: Handling a key fob during a consent search for drugs was not unreasonable because there was RS

The person who rented the motel room for defendant and another still had the key and equal access to the room to consent to its search. In a consent search of the room for drugs in a suspected drug dealing operation, the police handled a key fob where defendant said she didn’t have a car there. Assuming handling the key fob was a search, the court finds that handling it was beyond the scope of consent but otherwise reasonable because there was reasonable suspicion that there was, in fact, another car there. United States v. Dasinger, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9486 (11th Cir. May 24, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Handling a key fob during a consent search for drugs was not unreasonable because there was RS

NPR: Victims Of Civil Asset Forfeiture Criticize New Federal Rules

NPR: Victims Of Civil Asset Forfeiture Criticize New Federal Rules with Martin Kaste:

Early last year, the Obama administration pledged to reform the civil asset forfeiture system, by which police can seize and keep suspicious assets without having to convict anyone of a crime. Critics of that system say the reforms haven’t changed much.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on NPR: Victims Of Civil Asset Forfeiture Criticize New Federal Rules

CA8: Consent to fully search a home includes forensically searching computers found there

Consent to fully search defendant’s home by PO’s after a computer was found in violation of the terms of his release is consent to forensically analyze the product of the search, here a computer hard drive. United States v. Berger, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9629 (8th Cir. May 26, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent | Comments Off on CA8: Consent to fully search a home includes forensically searching computers found there

GA: Officer searched after a private search, but state failed in burden of showing any justification for officer’s search

Defendant was transported to the hospital by ambulance after a car wreck. Hospital security smelled marijuana in his backpack and searched it and called the police. An officer arrived and searched the backpack without consulting with hospital security. The search was not reasonable and not based on exigency. There was no testimony of one of the security officers that they smelled marijuana and nothing from the officer about him smelling it. State v. Cook, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 295 (May 25, 2016).*

Defendant was subjected to a probation search one year and one day after he was placed on one year probation. Because the statutory process of processing him off probation hadn’t been completed, and they had up to 30 days to do so, he was still on supervision until the bureaucracy released him. His child pornography is not suppressed. People v. Young, 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 426 (1st Dist. April 27, 2016), ordered published May 26, 2016).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Private search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Officer searched after a private search, but state failed in burden of showing any justification for officer’s search

CA2: Retention of mirror image of hard drives for 3 yrs before searching them under SW was at least good faith

The government copied defendant’s hard drives in 2003 but didn’t get around to searching them until 2006. After discussing the privacy interests in data and the wealth of information that could be held on a computer, the court said: “Having noted Ganias’s argument, we do not decide its merits. We instead turn to the question of good faith.” This tells you all you need to know: the good faith exception applies. The court mentions the failure of the defense to file a motion for return of the copies. United States v. Ganias, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9706 (2d Cir. May 27, 2016) (en banc):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2: Retention of mirror image of hard drives for 3 yrs before searching them under SW was at least good faith

DC: A SW doesn’t have to be just for evidence of a crime—it can be for “evidence that might lead to other evidence”

A search warrant doesn’t have to be just for evidence of a crime—it can be for “evidence that might lead to other evidence.” In re Grand Jury Witness G.B., 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 170 (May 26, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on DC: A SW doesn’t have to be just for evidence of a crime—it can be for “evidence that might lead to other evidence”

Texas Lawyer: Federal Judge Allows Plaintiff to Sue Officers After He Was Detained for Videoing a Police Station

Texas Lawyer: Federal Judge Allows Plaintiff to Sue Officers After He Was Detained for Videoing a Police Station by John Council:

An Austin federal judge has ruled that an amateur photographer can pursue a civil rights case against four police officers after they detained and handcuffed him for filming the Round Rock Police Department building.

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Texas Lawyer: Federal Judge Allows Plaintiff to Sue Officers After He Was Detained for Videoing a Police Station

OH11: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on suppression ruling requires reversal

Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law requires reversal. “While it is error for the trial court to fail in providing requested findings of fact, it is not prejudicial where the record provides an appellate court with a sufficient basis to review the assignments of error. Even when findings of fact are not requested, failure to provide them may still be considered reversible error when the record is not sufficient to facilitate appellate review.” State v. Shine, 2016-Ohio-3123, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1964 (11th Dist. May 23, 2016).*

The officer had 16 years experience and had smelled marijuana at least 100 times on the job, so he was credited that he could smell it here coming from defendant’s car. That was probable cause. State v. Fields, 2016-Ohio-3127, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1973 (5th Dist. May 23, 2016).*

Defendant’s stop was based on a citizen informant, and defendant was apparently under the influence, and that supported a FST. State v. Scranton, 2016-Ohio-3128, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1974 (5th Dist. May 23, 2016).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH11: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on suppression ruling requires reversal

CNET: Senate bill would let FBI read your emails without a court order

CNET: Senate bill would let FBI read your emails without a court order by Shara Tibken

The 2017 Intelligence Authorization Act would deal a blow to privacy by making government surveillance easier.

Posted in E-mail, National security | Comments Off on CNET: Senate bill would let FBI read your emails without a court order

TX: Two cases on exigency for warrantless blood draw for DUI

Cole v. State, 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 84 (May 25, 2016) (dissent), found exigency, reversing the court of appeals. Defendant here drove 110 mph down a city street, ran a red light, and the ensuing accident resulted in a block-long debris field, two vehicles on fire, and killed the other driver. The sheer magnitude of the accident and the strain on law enforcement officers working it justified exigency. The court refers to Weems, decided at the same time:

Weems v. State, 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 85 (May 25, 2016), found no exigency for this defendant’s warrantless blood draw where he ran from the crash of his car but was found 40 minutes later hiding under another car when that driver called the police. Defendant complained of back and neck pain and he went to the hospital first instead of to a magistrate’s office for advice on consent to a blood draw or the obtaining of a warrant.
Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on TX: Two cases on exigency for warrantless blood draw for DUI

CA9: It was obvious by signs and longstanding practice that military bases are secure; having to lockup belongings before a consensual interview on the base wasn’t a seizure

Plaintiff was employed by the military, and NCIS had him come to a base for an interview about budgetary matters. The base was secure and everybody entering was subject to search and knew it from the signs. In the interview room area, plaintiff was required to put the contents of his pockets in a lockbox as a condition of the interview. Since he consented to the interview, he consented to that, too, and it was not an unreasonable search and seizure. The investigation and interview resulted in no action against him, so he sued. And lost this issue. Farkas v. Williams, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9490 (9th Cir. May 24, 2016).

The record supported the district court’s determination that defendant’s continued detention after the conclusion of the traffic stop was consensual. Thus, court did not need to reach the question of reasonable suspicion of drug trafficking. Defendant’s subsequent consent to a roadside search of his vehicle was voluntary. Regardless of that, by then officers had probable cause to search his vehicle. A later search at the Department of Public Safety office was also valid. United States v. Beltran, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9445 (5th Cir. May 23, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonableness, Special needs | Comments Off on CA9: It was obvious by signs and longstanding practice that military bases are secure; having to lockup belongings before a consensual interview on the base wasn’t a seizure

PA: Trial court erred in finding separate room in apt searched with SW was somebody else’s separate living quarters

The search warrant was for an apartment, and there was no justification for the trial court’s finding that a separate room inside was really separate living quarters for somebody else. There was no separate entrance or no mailbox. Commonwealth v. Korn, 2016 PA Super 109, 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 290 (May 25, 2016).

The driver committed a traffic violation but then didn’t stop for another block committing other violations. When he got out of the car, his body movements suggested he was armed. It was a high crime area at night with recent shootings. The court finds the car search valid under two theories: probable cause or protective weapons search. United States v. Rockett, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66018 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 11, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65759 (E.D. Mo. May 19, 2016).*

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Trial court erred in finding separate room in apt searched with SW was somebody else’s separate living quarters

Slate: If You Fly a Drone, so Can Police

Slate: If You Fly a Drone, so Can Police by Stephen E. Henderson:

What the Fourth Amendment says about law enforcement use of unmanned aerial vehicles.

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Slate: If You Fly a Drone, so Can Police

AZ: When statute unambiguous, officer’s mistake of law a little hard to argue

The officer’s stop of defendant based on a mistake of law about the taillight being a backup light was not reasonable. The statute was unambiguous, and Heien provides no support. State v. Stoll, 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 89 (May 23, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on AZ: When statute unambiguous, officer’s mistake of law a little hard to argue

D.Neb.: Controlled buys and watching def to go his storage unit for more was PC

Defendant had been coming and going from a storage unit where the police knew he stored methamphetamine. “There had been controlled purchases of methamphetamine directly from Leyva-Martinez. Officer Milone and other OPD officers had sufficient probable cause to stop the Ford F-250 and make a warrantless arrest of Leyva-Martinez.” United States v. Leyva-Martinez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66057 (D.Neb. April 29, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66059 (D. Neb. May 19, 2016).*

Defendant had two cell phones when he crossed the border at Nogales. First he said he was going to Nogales to pay bills. Then he said he was going to Phoenix to pick up money. The search of his cell phones at the border was reasonable. 12 pounds of methamphetamine were found in the vehicle’s firewall. United States v. Cano, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65530 (D.Ariz. Mar. 18, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65529 (D. Ariz. May 18, 2016).*

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Controlled buys and watching def to go his storage unit for more was PC

CA9: 911 call about two black male teenagers involved in a crime didn’t give PC to arrest three Samoan teenagers; immediately recognizing a toy gun as such wasn’t RS

The court of appeals had jurisdiction to consider defendant officers’ appeal from denial of qualified immunity on plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment unlawful arrest and search claims, but the court’s jurisdiction was limited to deciding whether the officers were entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law. After receiving information about an apartment manager’s 911 call regarding two black adult males, officers did not have probable cause to arrest three Samoan teenagers. The officers determined almost immediately that a suspected gun was a toy, and at that point any suspicion that the teenagers were engaged in a crime dissipated. The officers violated the Fourth Amendment by continuing the seizure beyond that point. The officers were not entitled to qualified immunity for their entry and search of a family’s apartment. Sialoi v. City of San Diego, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9489 (9th Cir. May 24, 2016).

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: 911 call about two black male teenagers involved in a crime didn’t give PC to arrest three Samoan teenagers; immediately recognizing a toy gun as such wasn’t RS

CA4: Failure to make eye contact or acknowledge police not RS

Defendant was stopped because he was the only person seen in a three block radius from a shots fired call. His failure to respond to the police or make eye contact was ambiguous and within his rights, so it couldn’t support reasonable suspicion in themselves. Once he was stopped, however, his reaching for a pocket when asked about a gun was, in fact, reasonable suspicion. United States v. Foster, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9502 (4th Cir. May 24, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to make eye contact or acknowledge police not RS