S.D.Ala.: No suppression hearing if defense doesn’t contradict govt’s assertions of fact

When the defendant doesn’t controvert the material facts in the government’s response to his motion to suppress, a hearing isn’t required because all the court has is to apply the law to the facts. United States v. Sledge, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68499 (S.D.Ala. May 25, 2016).

Sufficient nexus was shown between the arrest of a child pornographer in the Netherlands and search of his computer along with his admissions that he had traveled to defendant’s home about child pornography in Georgia and exchanged child porn. United States v. Nichols, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69230 (N.D.Ga. April 29, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.