W.D.Tenn.: Nothing of exterior of building suggested separate living units inside; officers found def’s door open and unlocked inside

Nothing of the outward appearance of the dwelling that was subject to the search warrant suggested that there were multiple units inside. Thus, officers could not have known until after entry seeing some of the doors with keyed locks, and their testimony on that is credited. Defendant’s door was not locked and the door was open. United States v. Sibert, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127342 (E.D.Tenn. Aug. 10, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126961 (E.D. Tenn. Sept. 19, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Nothing of exterior of building suggested separate living units inside; officers found def’s door open and unlocked inside

AK: State court judgment not “void” for habeas purposes because evidence illegally seized

A state court judgment is not “void” for state habeas purposes because it relies on evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Olson v. State, 2016 Alas. App. LEXIS 172 (Sept. 23, 2016).

Defendant saw an unmarked police car, put an object down, and fled. Police testified they were stopped to issue a summons for obstructing a passageway in a high crime area at night. Defendant was finally tackled in a backyard, and a gun removed from him. He said he was running because he didn’t want to get robbed, but the court credits that the officers said they were police as he fled. The seizure of the gun was lawful. United States v. Monts, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127697 (D.N.J. Sept. 19, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: State court judgment not “void” for habeas purposes because evidence illegally seized

TN: The host had common authority over the guest’s part of the premises; he was only there every other night

Defendant had been staying every other night with his brother who stayed in the property leased by Ms. Bryant. She had common authority over that room and went in it all the time. The trial court did not err in finding common authority for her to consent to police searching the room. Prior cases in this court found common authority on less contact with the guest’s room. State v. Bryant, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 711 (Sept. 21, 2016).

Officers had reasonable suspicion when they saw defendant’s car to believe that the car was there to assist a fugitive in flight. That and the driver’s nervousness supported a frisk of the vehicle for weapons. United States v. Howard, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127690 (S.D.Ala. Sept. 20, 2016).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TN: The host had common authority over the guest’s part of the premises; he was only there every other night

NE: A DRE expert isn’t required to make stop have PC for a DWI arrest

It isn’t required that the state have a DRE specialist make an arrest to determine whether there is probable cause for defendant’s arrest. It is required that the officers exclude other possibilities for the appearance of intoxication. State v. Rothenberger, 294 Neb. 810, 2016 Neb. LEXIS 142 (Sept. 23, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: A DRE expert isn’t required to make stop have PC for a DWI arrest

E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

Defendant was accused of sex trafficking a minor and provided her a cell phone. She had apparent authority to consent to search of the phone, and it was voluntarily given. United States v. Gardner, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128480 (E.D.Mich. Sept. 21, 2016) [The opinion takes too long to get there, and the court could also have just said defendant lacked standing by giving her the phone for business use.]

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress the seizure of electronic media that was seized by state officials and then transferred to the feds. No case says that’s unreasonable. Defendant’s emails were obtained by search warrant, and there’s nothing raised substantive about that. Obayagbona v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127924 (D.N.J. Sept. 19, 2016).*

Posted in Apparent authority, E-mail, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

E.D.Ky.: Even if dog unlawfully came on curtilage, officers’ plain smell of MJ from the street was PC

Officers went to defendant’s house suspecting a grow operation. On the sidewalk in front of his house, they could smell raw marijuana. They went to the door and window air conditioning unit and could smell it. They brought a drug dog to the house to sniff, and the dog alerted. There was plenty of probable cause besides the dog sniff, which the court finds violated curtilage, so the motion to suppress the search warrant is denied. United States v. Wingate, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127712 (E.D.Ky. Sept. 20, 2016). [Note that the court could remain true to Jardines and still find the probable cause for the search warrant based on the officers’ plain smell. No need to engage is gymnastics trying to find a way to get the dog legally on the premises.]

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Even if dog unlawfully came on curtilage, officers’ plain smell of MJ from the street was PC

NYTimes: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter? Chief Justice’s Fate Tied to Election

NYTimes: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter? Chief Justice’s Fate Tied to Election by Adam Liptak:

WASHINGTON — In Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s 11 years on the Supreme Court, his unfolding legacy has been marked by a debate over whether his very occasional liberal votes in major cases were the acts of a statesman devoted to his institution, a traitor to his principles or the legal umpire he said he aspired to be at his confirmation hearings.

This election could settle that debate.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYTimes: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter? Chief Justice’s Fate Tied to Election

D.Del.: Where records examination is voluntary, no 4A claim stated where ptf refuses

The Delaware State Escheater sought an examination of records of Marathon Petroleum, and it refused to comply. The state could not force plaintiff to comply, so there is no search if plaintiff refuses. Marathon Petroleum Corp. v. Cook, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130358 (D.Del. Sept. 23, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Where records examination is voluntary, no 4A claim stated where ptf refuses

WaPo: Meet the judge who just released 200 secret government surveillance requests

WaPo: Meet the judge who just released 200 secret government surveillance requests by Spencer Hsu:

In ordering the first-ever release by a full federal district court of a year’s worth of secret government surveillance requests, U.S. District Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell of Washington this week added to a decades-long career spent charting the frontier of technology and the law in the nation’s capital. Howell on Wednesday stepped into the fierce debate over the limits of secrecy and law enforcement searches in a digital age by releasing a list of more than 200 cases in which U.S. prosecutors in the District sought court orders for data about individuals’ phone, email or online communications. Nationwide, more than 20,000 such orders were approved in 2013 alone; almost none ever are unsealed. The release came in a journalist’s request for records and was heard by Howell in her relatively new capacity as chief judge, a seniority-based post.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Meet the judge who just released 200 secret government surveillance requests

OH10: Leaving house to go to drug deal and returning there was nexus to house

Nexus to defendant’s house for a drug search warrant is shown by the fact that he returned to the house immediately after a drug transaction [what does that prove? Most people go home after work] and left the house to go to the drug transaction [yes in reverse order; leaving to go to a drug transaction suggests more]. The CI also connects the house to drugs. State v. Phillips, 2016-Ohio-5944, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3785 (10th Dist. Sept. 22, 2016).

Despite plaintiff’s acquittal in a conspiracy case, there was always probable cause to believe that he was involved in it, and that precludes summary judgment for malicious prosecution. Zargari v. United States, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17329 (11th Cir. Sept. 22, 2016).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Nexus | Comments Off on OH10: Leaving house to go to drug deal and returning there was nexus to house

CA7: Family computer that everybody knew password to gives common authority to all

The computer in the house belonged to defendant but it was a family computer and everybody knew the password. That being the case, any one of them had common authority over the computer to consent to its search. The fact that the consenter was moving out doesn’t mean that common authority ended. United States v. Wright, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17429 (7th Cir. Sept. 23, 2016).

Defendant’s arrest for OVI inevitably led to the inventory search of his vehicle. State v. Mack, 2016-Ohio-6958, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3813 (2d Dist. Sept. 23, 2016).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Inventory | Comments Off on CA7: Family computer that everybody knew password to gives common authority to all

AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

The 4 on the year on the LPN expiration sticker looked funny, so the Trooper ran the LPN and it came back expired in 2011. It had been altered with a marker. Defendant said he borrowed his friend’s pickup. Defendant also had a PV warrant out for him, which he admitted. He was getting arrested for that, and the vehicle had to be towed rather than left on the interstate. By now, defendant was sweating profusely. The officer did say: “I just want to get [Hicks] gone so I can get in the vehicle. He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope. He’s been arrested for carrying a weapon,” but it was otherwise shown to be a valid inventory. Search incident didn’t need to be considered. Fricks v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 415, 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 459 (Sept. 21, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

OR: Search of Altoids tin during search of backpack for drugs was reasonable

When searching defendant’s backpack incident to arrest for drugs, the further search of an Altoids tin wasn’t unreasonable because it was a place where drugs would be held. State v. Krause, 281 Ore. App. 143, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1142 (Sept. 21, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on OR: Search of Altoids tin during search of backpack for drugs was reasonable

CA5: Warning potential victim of a hit on him overheard on a wiretap didn’t dissipate the exigency to try to stop it

The FBI learned through a wiretap that a person had a hit out on him by defendant, and succeeded in finding him and warning him. The mere fact he was warned didn’t dissipate the exigency because, until defendant was rounded up, it could still happen. United States v. Toussaint, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17357 (5th Cir. Sept. 22, 2016), revg, United States v. Toussaint, 117 F. Supp. 3d 822 (E.D. La. 2015):
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA5: Warning potential victim of a hit on him overheard on a wiretap didn’t dissipate the exigency to try to stop it

Esquire: The Bill of Rights Is Hanging by a Thread

Esquire: The Bill of Rights Is Hanging by a Thread by Charles P. Pierce:
The law is supposed to be our protector, not our enemy.
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Esquire: The Bill of Rights Is Hanging by a Thread

TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

Based on blood on defendant’s sock, on the totality there was probable cause to believe that more possible blood evidence would be found in his car. That was sufficient for the automobile exception to apply. State v. Peden, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 699 (Sept. 19, 2016).

It is not inherently incredible that defendant erratically drove across five lanes of traffic and almost collided with a car, and then almost hit a police car. The smell of marijuana justified the search after the stop. United States v. Dean, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17434 (6th Cir. Sept. 22, 2016).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Blood on def’s sock supported PC for automobile exception

S.D.Iowa finds Playpen NIT warrant violation of Rule 41 and Fourth Amendment

S.D.Iowa joins minority and finds Playpen NIT warrant violation of Rule 41 also a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Croghan, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127479 (S.D.Iowa Sept. 19, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41 | Comments Off on S.D.Iowa finds Playpen NIT warrant violation of Rule 41 and Fourth Amendment

IL: Stop for failure to signal lane movement was not unreasonable where no case said officer couldn’t make stop

The officer’s stop of defendant for not using his turn signal when the signal lane became two lanes was at least a mistake of law under Heien, already recognized in Illinois. No state case addresses these facts, and it’s not inconceivable that it applied. People v. Theus, 2016 IL App (4th) 160139, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 637 (Sept. 22, 2016).

The search of defendant’s person produced no evidence used against him. Therefore, there is nothing to suppress, whether the search was legal or not. Haney v. Commonwealth, 2016 Ky. App. LEXIS 171 (Sept. 23, 2016).

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Stop for failure to signal lane movement was not unreasonable where no case said officer couldn’t make stop

E.D.Va.: Def claimed on post-conviction defense counsel promised win on motion to suppress; hearing has to be held

Defendant in his 2255 claimed defense counsel promised that he could win a motion to suppress. Defense counsel denied it, saying he reviewed the file and told defendant it was a hopeless motion. A hearing has to be held. United States v. Harris, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130436 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Def claimed on post-conviction defense counsel promised win on motion to suppress; hearing has to be held

The Hill Blog: Open-carry opens up series of constitutional issues for cops

The Hill Blog: Open-carry opens up series of constitutional issues for cops by Geoffrey Corn:

A police officer receives a dispatch call to a public disturbance. The dispatcher provides the limited information she can: protesters have assembled in a downtown location; tensions are rising between competing groups; no violence reported so far but tempers seem to be flaring.
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on The Hill Blog: Open-carry opens up series of constitutional issues for cops