AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

The 4 on the year on the LPN expiration sticker looked funny, so the Trooper ran the LPN and it came back expired in 2011. It had been altered with a marker. Defendant said he borrowed his friend’s pickup. Defendant also had a PV warrant out for him, which he admitted. He was getting arrested for that, and the vehicle had to be towed rather than left on the interstate. By now, defendant was sweating profusely. The officer did say: “I just want to get [Hicks] gone so I can get in the vehicle. He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope. He’s been arrested for carrying a weapon,” but it was otherwise shown to be a valid inventory. Search incident didn’t need to be considered. Fricks v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 415, 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 459 (Sept. 21, 2016):

Next, Fricks maintains that the search was investigatory in that Easley ended the search as soon as he found incriminating items and that the dash-cam video reveals Easley’s true motive when he said, “I just want to get [Hicks] gone so I can get in the vehicle. He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope. He’s been arrested for carrying a weapon.”

To suppress an inventory search, a defendant must show that the police officers were conducting the inventory search in bad faith for the sole purpose of collecting evidence. Welch v. State, 330 Ark. 158, 955 S.W.2d 181 (1997). The presence of an investigatory motive, even if proved, does not invalidate an otherwise lawful inventory search. Bratton, supra. Easley’s comment does not reveal that his motive was solely investigatory or that the search was otherwise conducted in bad faith. Easley testified that he was “pretty sure” there was contraband in the vehicle given Fricks’s demeanor and the fact that he was sweating profusely. Easley further stated that Fricks was a large man and that he was afraid that the officers were “going to have a problem” with him if they discovered contraband in his presence. Just because Easley suspected that they might find incriminating items because of Fricks’s mention that his parole was related to drugs does not invalidate the search. Bratton, supra.

This entry was posted in Inventory. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.