E.D.Mich.: Def provided a cell phone to a minor he was trafficking for sex, and he had no REP in it even though he paid for it

Defendant was accused of sex trafficking a minor and provided her a cell phone. She had apparent authority to consent to search of the phone, and it was voluntarily given. United States v. Gardner, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128480 (E.D.Mich. Sept. 21, 2016) [The opinion takes too long to get there, and the court could also have just said defendant lacked standing by giving her the phone for business use.]

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress the seizure of electronic media that was seized by state officials and then transferred to the feds. No case says that’s unreasonable. Defendant’s emails were obtained by search warrant, and there’s nothing raised substantive about that. Obayagbona v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127924 (D.N.J. Sept. 19, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, E-mail, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.