IA: Strip search incident shown justified in drug arrest

Strip search as a search incident to arrest was shown justified on this record. The smell of marijuana came from his person but nothing was on him. State v. Evans, 2016 Iowa App. LEXIS 1004 (Sept. 28, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Strip search | Comments Off on IA: Strip search incident shown justified in drug arrest

MS: A case seizure after a consent search leads to no forfeiture; no evidence of wrongdoing

Claimant was stopped, and he consented to a search producing money. The order of forfeiture is reversed. The facts, when taken as a whole, did not show by more than just suspicion that the money discovered in a driver’s vehicle was garnered or provided to be used in exchange for drugs where there was no actual tie between the money and illegal drug trafficking, the residue in the vehicle’s hidden compartment that the officers alleged appeared to be marijuana was never collected, preserved, or tested, the driver was never charged with any crime relating to possession of illegal narcotics stemming from the traffic stop, he had no prior criminal record or known illegal drug involvement at the time of the incident, the driver had very recently purchased the vehicle second-hand, and had a plausible explanation for every question asked of him. Apolinar v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 621 (Sept. 27, 2016).*

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on MS: A case seizure after a consent search leads to no forfeiture; no evidence of wrongdoing

MA: SW for a cell phone requires facts for nexus to crime, not just “experience shows”

Nexus between a cell phone’s contents and a crime has to be shown by evidence, not just the officer’s experience in similar cases. Also, the phone was seized without a warrant to protect the contents from tampering, and it was not subjected to the warranted search for 68 days. That, too, was unreasonable. Commonwealth v. White, 475 Mass. 583 (Sept. 28, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on MA: SW for a cell phone requires facts for nexus to crime, not just “experience shows”

FL1: Passenger’s detention may be extended because of RS as to driver

A passenger is stopped with the vehicle he or she was in. The length of that stop depends upon what happens with the driver and passenger, and it can be extended lawfully as to the passenger because of reasonable suspicion with the driver. Presley v. State, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14509 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 28, 2016).

The owner of the home had people living with him. He called the police because they were smoking crack, and he had authority to consent to their entry at the minimum to go up the stairs, a common area, to the landing where defendant was smoking crack and had drug paraphernalia out in plain view. State v. Wooten, 2016-Ohio-6980, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3829 (3d Dist. Sept. 26, 2016).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: Passenger’s detention may be extended because of RS as to driver

M.D.Fla.: Even if def counsel filed and won suppression motion, would outcome of case be different?

On a search and seizure IAC claim, too, only the Strickland prejudice prong needs to be considered. Even if the evidence were suppressed, would the jury have still convicted? If yes, then no prejudice. Pittman v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132164 (M.D.Fla. Sept. 27, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Even if def counsel filed and won suppression motion, would outcome of case be different?

The Atlantic: Body Cameras Are Betraying Their Promise

The Atlantic: Body Cameras Are Betraying Their Promise by Robinson Meyer:

They’re not transparent. They’re not independent. They’re not even turned on when they should be.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Body Cameras Are Betraying Their Promise

D.Kan.: USMJ’s email warrant denial for lack of PC affirmed, but gov’t can reapply because it has more info

The USMJ’s decision that the email search warrant didn’t show probable cause is not reversed, but it was sufficiently particular. The government can reapply again because it says it has additional information. Courts must balance privacy and the government’s ability to prosecute crime, and the law allows it to “seize first, search later.” “And while this court acknowledges that a judge may have the authority to impose reasonable ex ante instructions, it declines to comment on the ex ante instructions suggested by Judge Waxse.” In the Matter of the Search of Information Associated with Email Addresses Stored at Premises Controlled by the Microsoft Corp., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133759 (D.Kan. Sept. 28, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: USMJ’s email warrant denial for lack of PC affirmed, but gov’t can reapply because it has more info

WaPo: Want to make a million? Become a DEA informant

WaPo: Want to make a million? Become a DEA informant by Joe Davidson:

There’s an unfortunate saying on the street: Snitches get stitches.

Turns out some get paid, too, sometimes very, very well.

Consider this from a new report on major problems with the Drug Enforcement Administration’s confidential-informant program. DEA paid:

• One source $30 million over a 30-year period, “some of it in cash payments of more than $400,000.”

• Nine people $25 million during a five-year period, averaging $555,555 annually, for narcotics-related information and assisting law enforcement.

• A parcel worker more than $1 million over five years, or $200,000 a year.

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WaPo: Want to make a million? Become a DEA informant

KROU (NPR): Oklahoma Senate Committee Examines Privacy, Property Concerns About Drone Use

KROU (NPR): Oklahoma Senate Committee Examines Privacy, Property Concerns About Drone Use by Brian Hardzinski & Storme Jones:
Continue reading →

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on KROU (NPR): Oklahoma Senate Committee Examines Privacy, Property Concerns About Drone Use

EFF: Why the Warrant to Hack in the Playpen Case Was an Unconstitutional General Warrant

EFF: Why the Warrant to Hack in the Playpen Case Was an Unconstitutional General Warrant by Andrew Crocker:

Should the government be able to get a warrant to search a potentially unlimited number of computers belonging to unknown people located anywhere in the world? That’s the question posed by the Playpen case, involving the FBI’s use of malware against over a thousand visitors to a site hosting child pornography. The prosecutions resulting from this mass hacking operation are unprecedented in many ways, but the scope of the single warrant that purportedly authorized the FBI’s actions represents perhaps the biggest departure from traditional criminal procedure.
Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Scope of search | Comments Off on EFF: Why the Warrant to Hack in the Playpen Case Was an Unconstitutional General Warrant

S.D.Tex.: Stop of Greyhound bus in Conroe TX just to search it was unreasonable

Five officers boarded a Greyhound bus in Conroe, Texas just to search it and confront passengers. Defendant’s consent to search belongings suppressed. This was a forced interaction by detaining the bus. United States v. Wise, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130681 (S.D.Tex. Sept. 23, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Stop of Greyhound bus in Conroe TX just to search it was unreasonable

AR: Apparent scrivener’s error in the PC went uncorrected and became speculation

Search warrant was issued February 5, 2015 and showed the date of defendant’s alleged drug dealing as November 4-5, 2015. Whether it was a typo that should have been 2014, or should have been February 4-5, 2015 (which was speculative on this record), the search warrant was stale. (Reading between the lines, it’s possible the state could have saved this by testimony at the suppression hearing that it was a mere scrivener’s error, but they didn’t.) Batthrick v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 444, 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 479 (Sept. 28, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on AR: Apparent scrivener’s error in the PC went uncorrected and became speculation

S.D.N.Y.: PC was shown, partly based on LEO’s expert opinion

There was probable cause for the search warrant in this case, partly based on a law enforcement officer’s expert opinion about drug trafficking. United States v. Lights, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130915 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2016).

Another two Playpen cases; motions to suppress denied. United States v. Broy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128616 (C.D.Ill. Sept. 21, 2016);* United States v. Anzalone, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129735 (D.Mass. Sept. 22, 2016).*

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: PC was shown, partly based on LEO’s expert opinion

CT: Even if search was unreasonable, which isn’t decided, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt

Defendant was convicted of murdering his girlfriend with a baseball bat. After killing her, he took some of her stuff and sold and gave it away. He spent the third night after the killing at his sister’s house, and he ended up in custody. She consented to the seizure of his stuff from her house. The court declines to even decide the merits of the search because it is, in any event, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Quail, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 372 (Oct. 4, 2016).

Marijuana was found in one of two backpacks that came into a store on the backs of defendant and another. Defendant didn’t show standing in the backpack that the marijuana was in. United States v. Walker, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128798 (D.Nev. Sept. 21, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152605 (D.Nev. Nov. 3, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on CT: Even if search was unreasonable, which isn’t decided, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Government ‘hacking’ and the Playpen search warrant

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Government ‘hacking’ and the Playpen search warrant by Orin Kerr:

In recent months, over a dozen district courts have handed down divided opinions on the legality of a single search warrant that was used to search the computers of many visitors to a child pornography website. The warrant raises interesting legal issues, although I think the significant issues are mostly not the ones that have received the most media attention. Many of these cases are headed to various courts of appeal, so I thought I would present an overview of the investigation and discuss some of the legal issues raised by the warrant.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Government ‘hacking’ and the Playpen search warrant

ABAJ: New York considers ‘textalyzer’ bill to allow police to see if drivers were texting behind the wheel

ABAJ: New York considers ‘textalyzer’ bill to allow police to see if drivers were texting behind the wheel by Jason Tashea:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on ABAJ: New York considers ‘textalyzer’ bill to allow police to see if drivers were texting behind the wheel

W.D.Ark.: “it was not clearly established that the inspection of legal materials during a shakedown violates the inmate’s clearly established constitutional rights”

“[I]t was not clearly established that the inspection of legal materials during a shakedown violates the inmate’s clearly established constitutional rights.” Knox v. Livermore, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130485 (W.D.Ark. June 2, 2016).

Defendant’s consent three minutes into the stop was voluntary under the totality. While the whole thing took a while, the early consent made it reasonable. People v. Chavez-Barragan, 2016 CO 66, 2016 Colo. LEXIS 979 (Sept. 26, 2016).*

Defendant’s buccal swab was obtained clearly by consent, so it will not be suppressed. United States v. Jones, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128412 (D.Minn. July 28, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128075 (D. Minn. Sept. 19, 2016).*

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: “it was not clearly established that the inspection of legal materials during a shakedown violates the inmate’s clearly established constitutional rights”

SCOTUSBlog: The Court after Scalia: The despicable and dispensable exclusionary rule

SCOTUSBlog: The Court after Scalia: The despicable and dispensable exclusionary rule by Akhil Amar:

Akhil Reed Amar is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University. His new book, The Constitution Today, contains much more material on several of this essay’s themes: the constitutional wrongness of the exclusionary rule, the principled power of originalism, the pending Supreme Court vacancy, and the complex legacy of Antonin Scalia.
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: The Court after Scalia: The despicable and dispensable exclusionary rule

HuffPo: Blog: Police Body Cameras Are OK, But How To Protect Innocent Prisoners?

HuffPo: Blog: Police Body Cameras Are OK, But How To Protect Innocent Prisoners? by Lorenzo Johnson:

It’s time to think about what measures can be put in place to hold all law enforcement accountable.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on HuffPo: Blog: Police Body Cameras Are OK, But How To Protect Innocent Prisoners?

W.D.N.C.: Franks does include a right to a hearing without making a prima facie showing

Defendant doesn’t get an opportunity to test the truth of the affidavit under Franks in a hearing without making a prima facie case of materiality and wilful falsity. United States v. Payne, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127287 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127285 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Franks does include a right to a hearing without making a prima facie showing