D.C.Cir.: Omission of robbery victim’s failure to ID def didn’t cut either way in Franks analysis; PC still existed

Omission of a non-identification of defendant as a robber was not material for Franks. “Even viewing the omitted non-identification as a material omission, probable cause for the search did not rise or fall on the identification of Dorman as the robber; rather the link was between the Dodge Charger and the robbery, Dorman and the Charger, and Dorman and 2317 Chester Street … Dorman speculates that law enforcement officers ‘fear[ed]’ inclusion of the sales clerk’s statement ‘would jeopardize a probable cause finding.’ … MPD Detective Scott Brown, who prepared the affidavit, testified that he chose not to include the sales clerk’s statement in his affidavit because ‘it didn’t help the search warrant’ because the sales clerk was uncertain, but it also ‘didn’t hurt the search warrant’ because the clerk said Dorman’s photograph had some resemblance to the robber. … Dorman’s rank speculation is far from the ‘preponderance of the evidence’ required to demonstrate that the officer knowingly or recklessly omitted this statement, much less overcome the district court’s contrary finding on clear error review.” United States v. Dorman, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11159 (D.C. Cir. June 23, 2017).

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Omission of robbery victim’s failure to ID def didn’t cut either way in Franks analysis; PC still existed

KS: CI’s tip insufficient; motion to suppress should have been granted

The alleged reasonable suspicion for extending defendant’s traffic stop was the CI’s information which is found insufficient. The state’s alternative basis of defendant’s alleged “jumpiness” was never presented to the trial court. There are no findings on that, it is waived, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. “Lewis has correctly pointed out that the evidence presented at the suppression hearing did not support the trial court’s ruling that reasonable suspicion existed based on the confidential informant’s tip.” State v. Lewis, 2017 Kan. App. LEXIS 47 (June 16, 2017).*

The stop was with reasonable suspicion for two lane changes without signaling. Defendant seemed under the influence. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress because it would have been denied. City of Cleveland v. Maxwell, 2017-Ohio-4442, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2496 (8th Dist. June 22, 2017).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: CI’s tip insufficient; motion to suppress should have been granted

LA2: Reasonable possibility respondent was father was enough to order DNA test in face of 4A objection

Respondent was the subject of a petition to establish paternity, and he claimed that the statute to order DNA testing required the Fourth Amendment be complied with. “Here, Rogers argues that in order to prove a reasonable possibility of paternity, the state must have some corroborating evidence beyond Thompson’s claim that he is the father. Thus, we are called to determine if a mother’s allegations of a sexual relationship, without some corroboration, can establish a reasonable possibility of paternity.” Here, respondent kept the relationship secret so the mother has a reasonable explanation for not having corroboration. They were together sexually for a long time, and that’s enough. State v. Rogers, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1131 (La.App. 2 Cir. June 21, 2017).

Defendant was told he was not in custody when he was interrogated, and that led to consent. While he was not told of the right to refuse consent, he did understand he could end the interview at any time. The first three factors of consent favor it, and the last is neutral. On the totality, he consented. United States v. Atkins, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94206 (N.D. Cal. June 19, 2017).*

Posted in Consent, DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on LA2: Reasonable possibility respondent was father was enough to order DNA test in face of 4A objection

IA: Unnecessary to seek out somebody else not at scene to retrieve car when driver and only passenger arrested

The state showed the impoundment policy was standardized and complied with. It wasn’t necessary at the time to seek out somebody else to retrieve the car from the roadside when both the driver and passenger were arrested. State v. Tronca, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 620 (June 21, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IA: Unnecessary to seek out somebody else not at scene to retrieve car when driver and only passenger arrested

MT: Admission at a game checkpoint wasn’t “in custody”

Defendant was stopped at a game checkpoint and admitted to placing his daughter’s tag on a deer he shot. He was not “in custody” when he confessed. State v. Maile, 2017 MT 154, 2017 Mont. LEXIS 350 (June 23, 2017).

Defendant argued in the trial court that an 8 year old couldn’t consent to a search of his house. After the police were at the door, his mother consented to the search. The mother’s consent was never addressed in the trial court, and the defendant thus waived it for appeal. State v. Dahl, 2017 Ida. App. LEXIS 41 (June 22, 2017).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Roadblocks | Comments Off on MT: Admission at a game checkpoint wasn’t “in custody”

S.D.Ill.: Officer’s intentional delay in ticketing process made stop violate Rodriguez

Officer’s intentionally delaying the ticket writing process until the drug dog was on its way was intentional delay without reasonable suspicion under Rodriguez. United States v. Rodriguez-Escalera, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95848 (S.D. Ill. June 21, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Officer’s intentional delay in ticketing process made stop violate Rodriguez

IA: Consent valid based on testimony despite bodycam not picking up voices

The bodycam didn’t pick up the officer’s voice, which is “troubling,” but the trial court credited the officers’ testimony defendant consented, and that’s enough to have to affirm on consent. State v. Klinger, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 633 (June 21, 2017).*

The affidavit in support of defendant’s motion for new trial was based on a witness affidavit that did not directly address her alleged consent of the property searched. Therefore, the motion fails. United States v. Denton, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10765 (11th Cir. June 19, 2017).*

Posted in Body cameras, Burden of proof | Comments Off on IA: Consent valid based on testimony despite bodycam not picking up voices

D.P.R.: Officer found not believable on facts allegedly leading to RS

The court finds the officer not credible that the defendant picked up a gun and put in his pocket and there was thus no reasonable suspicion for his detention. United States v. Cruz-Montañez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96079 (D. P.R. June 21, 2017).

“After the accident, Marland did not initially consent to having his blood drawn. However, after his arrival at the hospital and a conversation with his fiancé, he indeed did consent, according to the testimony of two witnesses who were in the room at the time. Therefore, we conclude that the trial court relied on competent and credible testimony in finding that Marland consented.” State v. Marland, 2017-Ohio-4353, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2419 (3d Dist. June 19, 2017).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officer found not believable on facts allegedly leading to RS

D.Md.: Off-duty police officer’s in-person tip of possible DWI was RS

Off-duty police officer’s in person tip of possible drunk driver was reasonable suspicion for stop. United States v. Hernández-Ayala, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95387 (D. Md. June 21, 2017).

“[T]his Court also finds under the totality of the circumstances that the warrant to search the Nadine residence was supported by probable cause. The Confidential Source’s reliability and credibility were established in the affidavit. Also, the officers watched Ball as he engaged in drug activity with the Source. Clearly, the affidavit was supported by probable cause.” The good faith exception also would apply. United States v. Ball, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95309 (W.D. Tenn. June 21, 2017).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Md.: Off-duty police officer’s in-person tip of possible DWI was RS

The Marshall Project: How to Cut Down on Searches in Traffic Stops: Legalize Pot

The Marshall Project: How to Cut Down on Searches in Traffic Stops: Legalize Pot by Justin George and Eric Sarara with additional reporting by Anna Flagg:

The legalization of marijuana in Washington state and Colorado had at least one unanticipated effect on the streets: a sharp decline in the number of traffic stops resulting in searches by state police, a new analysis shows.

The drop means fewer interactions between police and drivers, potentially limiting dangerous clashes. But even though the number of searches fell significantly for all racial groups, black and Hispanic drivers are still searched at higher rates than white motorists, the analysis found.

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on The Marshall Project: How to Cut Down on Searches in Traffic Stops: Legalize Pot

W.D.Mo.: Illegal Terry frisk led to subsequent searches after arrest warrant found; no suppression under Strieff

Defendant’s Terry frisk was invalid, but the existence of a warrant for his arrest requires that the subsequent searches not be suppressed under Strieff. United States v. Sisco, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94761 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 11, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94308 (W.D. Mo. June 20, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Illegal Terry frisk led to subsequent searches after arrest warrant found; no suppression under Strieff

TX9: Texas provides no exclusionary remedy for illegal search and seizure in forfeiture cases

Texas provides no exclusionary remedy for illegal search and seizure in forfeiture cases. $102,450.00 in United States Currency v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5761 (Tex. App. – Beaumont June 22, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture | Comments Off on TX9: Texas provides no exclusionary remedy for illegal search and seizure in forfeiture cases

S.D.Cal.: Probation search waiver can’t be relied on when officers didn’t know about it at time of search

In a civil case relying on a probation search, “‘[a] Fourth Amendment search waiver cannot provide a justification for a search of a probationer where the officers were unaware of the waiver before they undertook the search.’ United States v. Job, 851 F.3d 889, 896 (9th Cir. 2017). Plaintiff has not alleged any facts about Defendants’ knowledge of his waiver before the search. Therefore, the Court cannot conclude that the searches were reasonable as a matter of law solely on the basis of Mr. Edwards’s Fourth Amendment search waiver.” Edwards v. Miracosta College, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95992 (S.D. Cal. June 20, 2017).

Lack of findings for lifetime satellite based monitoring of defendant required reversal, so the Grady v. North Carolina issue isn’t reached. State v. Dye, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 458 (June 20, 2017).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Probation search waiver can’t be relied on when officers didn’t know about it at time of search

D.Conn.: SW for drugs in house supported plain view of gun under mattress

There was evidence linking defendant’s alleged drug offenses to his home, so the warrant for his home was justified. A drug search is intensive, and the gun found under a mattress was in plain view. United States v. Reyes, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93483 (D. Conn. June 19, 2017).*

Defendant waived his appellate claim of an unconstitutional warrantless blood draw because he did not make the same argument in the trial court. He did not show defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing the blood draw’s constitutionality because he showed no prejudice because state law permitted a conviction based on an officer’s opinion of impairment, and evidence of impairment aside from the blood draw was overwhelming. State v. Perry, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 456 (June 20, 2017).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Conn.: SW for drugs in house supported plain view of gun under mattress

M.D.N.C.: SW for stolen tractor lawn mower didn’t support plain view in house of firearm

A search warrant for a stolen tractor lawn mower didn’t support a plain view in defendant’s house for alleged illegal firearms because they aren’t per se unlawful to possess. They could have been registered. United States v. White, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93750 (M.D. N.C. June 19, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: SW for stolen tractor lawn mower didn’t support plain view in house of firearm

CA5: Video of police shooting shows it was justified, so QI shown

Parents alleged Fourth Amendment violations under § 1983 in the fatal shooting of their son by a police officer. Based upon a bystander’s video of the incident, a reasonable officer in defendant’s position could have concluded that the son posed a threat of serious harm. On qualified immunity, the officer’s credibility was immaterial because the video offered irrefutable proof that the officer was justified in believing the son presented a threat at the time of the shooting. Thus, the officer was entitled to qualified immunity. Guerra v. Bellino, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10799 (5th Cir. June 19, 2017).

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Video of police shooting shows it was justified, so QI shown

PA: Nervousness alone isn’t reasonable suspicion

Nervousness alone isn’t reasonable suspicion. Commonwealth v. Morrison, 2017 PA Super 194, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 456 (June 21, 2017).

Officers plainly had probable cause to search defendant’s apartment, as the affidavit for the search warrant application stated that there were signs of a struggle in the victims’ apartment, that there were two victims with stab wounds, that there were areas of blood spatter throughout the apartment, and that fresh blood was located on the entry door handle of defendant’s apartment. Bailey v. State, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 538 (June 19, 2017).*

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Nervousness alone isn’t reasonable suspicion

CBS News: What is the future of privacy, surveillance and policing technologies under Trump?

CBS News: What is the future of privacy, surveillance and policing technologies under Trump? by Kathryn Watson:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CBS News: What is the future of privacy, surveillance and policing technologies under Trump?

CA3: Search of prison cell didn’t violate 4A

The search of plaintiff’s prison cell and confiscation of some of his stuff wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Barndt v. Wenerowicz, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10754 (3d Cir. June 19, 2017).*

The officer here saw a vehicle parked outside a 24-hour storage unit at 1:25 am and stopped to inquire whether they were renters or burglars. Nobody was cooperative, and this ripened to reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Stolen property and drug paraphernalia were found. This led to a search warrant for his house [which was tenuous at best] saved by the good faith exception. United States v. Sisco, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94308 (W.D. Mo. June 20, 2017).*

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Search of prison cell didn’t violate 4A

OH3: Several months of pole camera surveillance violated no REP

Pole camera surveillance for several months from a telephone pole across from defendant’s house violated no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy. The view of his house was no different than could be seen by any passersby. State v. Thomas, 2017-Ohio-4356, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2420 (3d Dist. June 19, 2017).

Plaintiff’s complaint that the affidavit for the arrest warrant misstated the facts in the video is just plain wrong. There plainly was probable cause. Bailey v. City of Ann Arbor, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10822 (6th Cir. June 20, 2017).*

Posted in Pole cameras, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH3: Several months of pole camera surveillance violated no REP