W.D.La.: Gant search incident permitted for arrest for violation of supervised release terms

Defendant was stopped for a warrant for violation of the terms of his supervised release. A search incident of his car was permissible under Gant. United States v. Briggs, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242751 (W.D. La. Oct. 22, 2026).

Defendant is charged with theft by shoplifting from a military base exchange. The government argues a lack of standing in what was stolen where a pants pocket was searched. The lack of standing here, however, depends on fraud or theft which is to be proved at trial, not a suppression hearing. United States v. Álvarez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242580 (D.P.R. Oct. 21, 2026).*

When defendant was arrested, a firearm he had was cleared for officer safety, and bullets and a spring came out. Defendant challenges admissibility under F.R.E. 104 [that’s a new one on me; that’s a chain of custody issue which is weight, not admissibility]. Denied. It’s not materially different. United States v. Fuller, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 242606 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 22, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probation / Parole search, Search incident, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.