OH3: Several months of pole camera surveillance violated no REP

Pole camera surveillance for several months from a telephone pole across from defendant’s house violated no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy. The view of his house was no different than could be seen by any passersby. State v. Thomas, 2017-Ohio-4356, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2420 (3d Dist. June 19, 2017).

Plaintiff’s complaint that the affidavit for the arrest warrant misstated the facts in the video is just plain wrong. There plainly was probable cause. Bailey v. City of Ann Arbor, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10822 (6th Cir. June 20, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Pole cameras, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.