Monthly Archives: August 2026

E.D.Mo.: Seizure of def’s Apple watch was valid as a search incident because it could be used to erase iPhone

Seizure of defendant’s Apple watch was valid incident to arrest because officers feared he could erase his iPhone with it. The traffic stop might have been pretextual, but it doesn’t matter because defendant had an arrest warrant on a federal … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Seizure of def’s Apple watch was valid as a search incident because it could be used to erase iPhone

Truthout: First Came the Flock Cameras. Now Local Cops Want Autonomous Drones.

Truthout: First Came the Flock Cameras. Now Local Cops Want Autonomous Drones. by Michael Ludwig (“Hundreds of local police departments have received waivers to fly surveillance drones that navigate with AI.”):

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Truthout: First Came the Flock Cameras. Now Local Cops Want Autonomous Drones.

NYT: The Surveillance Network Tracking Cars Across the U.S.

NYT: The Surveillance Network Tracking Cars Across the U.S. (there are now 120,000 cameras).

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on NYT: The Surveillance Network Tracking Cars Across the U.S.

D.N.M.: 2¼ hour detention was still with RS despite 10th Cir.’s 90-minute limit

“Defendant was detained from approximately 4:45 a.m. until his release at around 7:00 a.m., a total duration of two hours and 15 minutes. … Having concluded that the initial detention was lawful, the Court must next address whether the detention … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: 2¼ hour detention was still with RS despite 10th Cir.’s 90-minute limit

W.D.Pa.: ALPR hit on stolen vehicle was RS for stop

A U-Haul van was reported stolen by them, and the LPN was entered into the ALPR database. It showed up near Pittsburgh, and that was reasonable suspicion to pull it over. United States v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177108 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automatic license plate readers, Custody, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: ALPR hit on stolen vehicle was RS for stop

S.D.Miss.: Cell tower dump violated 4A as a de facto geofence warrant

U.S. District Judge affirms U.S.M.J.’s decision that cell tower dumps violated the Fourth Amendment. The request was essentially a geofence warrant without a showing of need. In re Four Applications for Search Warrants Seeking Info. Associated with Particular Cellular Towers, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, geofence | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Cell tower dump violated 4A as a de facto geofence warrant

NC: Def’s bloody shirt seized as evidence from ER didn’t need a SW to test for DNA

Defendant was a suspect in a shooting incident. At the ER, his bloody shirt was collected as evidence. A separate search warrant wasn’t required to test the DNA on it. State v. Howze, 2026 N.C. App. LEXIS 652 (Aug. 5, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, DNA, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NC: Def’s bloody shirt seized as evidence from ER didn’t need a SW to test for DNA

CA6: SW in drug case led to finding CSAM, SW was still particular

Defendant was a suspect in a drug investigation, and they got search warrants for his place and cell phones, not knowing even how many there were or what they looked like. The warrants were with probable cause. The search for … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: SW in drug case led to finding CSAM, SW was still particular

S.D.Tex.: Compelling def to give up combination to safe during search violated 5A

Compelling defendant to give up the combination of a safe in his shared dwelling to search it under a warrant violated the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Villarreal-Resendiz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174690 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2026):

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Compelling def to give up combination to safe during search violated 5A

CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

Plaintiff’s claim of being forced to do a drug test but not for protection of the children she cared for stated a claim and survived summary judgment. Knighton v. Benton Cty., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

During a traffic stop, officers left defendant’s car door open apparently so the drug dog would go in, and it did. This entry violated the Fourth Amendment. Boyd v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 263 (Aug. 5, 2026). The inventory … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Officers leaving car door open to facilitate drug dog entry into car violated 4A

S.D.Tex.: A safe could be searched under a child porn SW

On a child pornography search warrant, search of a locked safe was reasonable. United States v. Villarreal-Resendiz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174690 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2026). Stopping over the stop line was reasonable suspicion for this stop. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: A safe could be searched under a child porn SW

CA7: Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense; def’s backpack could be searched incident to it

Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense, and defendant’s backpack could be searched incident to it. United States v. Worku, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23239 (7th Cir. Aug. 4, 2026).* Because the stop and frisk was reasonable, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: Smoking marijuana in public is still an arrestable offense; def’s backpack could be searched incident to it

GA: Def in sex assault case has no standing to challenge alleged victim’s rape exam

“And here, it strains credulity for Young to claim that he has any standing to challenge the lawfulness of the victim’s sexual-assault examination.” Young v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 401 (Aug. 5, 2026).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on GA: Def in sex assault case has no standing to challenge alleged victim’s rape exam

CA8: Lesser intrusive measures not required for jail strip search

Defendant was strip searched on going into jail, no matter what type of unit he was going to, and a baggie of meth was found under his genitals. The strip search was reasonable and the jail didn’t have to accommodate … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Strip search | Comments Off on CA8: Lesser intrusive measures not required for jail strip search

FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

The stop was with reasonable suspicion, and the frisk can occur immediately. The trial court’s holding it couldn’t has no support in law. State v. Lyles, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 5911 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 5, 2026). The CI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on FL3: Frisk can occur immediately after stop

S.D.Ohio: Drug dog sticking head partially into open door area was at least with reasonable suspicion

“[W]here a dog only partially and briefly pokes their head into the interior of a vehicle, as Cody did here, such does not constitute a search. Fellmy, 165 F.4th at 506 (citing Caballes, 543 U.S. at 408-09) (finding a dog … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Drug dog sticking head partially into open door area was at least with reasonable suspicion

D.Me.: Failure of drug dog to alert is a factor in totality

The failure of the drug dog to alert doesn’t completely undermine probable case, but it is a factor in the totality of circumstances. Here, the government didn’t meet its burden. United States v. Presby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172828 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Me.: Failure of drug dog to alert is a factor in totality

M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

In this anticipatory warrant case, the package was delivered to the target residence but then moved to another residence. That created exigent circumstances for entry without a warrant. Officers also did a protective sweep and retreated to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

E.D.N.Y.: SW request to search cell phone seized two months earlier was unreasonable

“The government seeks a warrant to search two cellular phones that have been in its possession for more than two months since the time to execute a prior search warrant lapsed. In United States v. Smith, 967 F.3d 198 (2d … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: SW request to search cell phone seized two months earlier was unreasonable