Monthly Archives: February 2025

MS: Admitted “general crime control” roadblock still upheld based on part-time officer’s inexperience

While the officer in charge of the DL roadblock (highway safety) essentially admitted it was for general crime control (see Edmund v. City of Indianapolis), the court goes with the DUI arrest being valid. The officer “was the most inexperienced … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Roadblocks | Comments Off on MS: Admitted “general crime control” roadblock still upheld based on part-time officer’s inexperience

CA3: There is no REP in the exterior of a package in transit

The initial detention and exterior inspection of the parcel sent to defendant did not implicate his Fourth Amendment rights because it occurred within the guaranteed delivery window. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior of the parcel … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: There is no REP in the exterior of a package in transit

NY Erie Co.: State prosecutors have no control over federal officers involved in state search for discovery purposes

State prosecutors aren’t necessarily obliged to give over information on federal officers present at a state search considering they have no control over them and their testimony may be hard fought via Touhy letters and they may have nothing additional … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: State prosecutors have no control over federal officers involved in state search for discovery purposes

AR: Questions about legality of search before jury properly excluded under 403

Where the trial court denied the pretrial motion to suppress, cross-examination of the officer about the legality of the search was properly denied on objection by the state as potentially misleading to the jury. Damon v. State, 2025 Ark. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on AR: Questions about legality of search before jury properly excluded under 403

E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

Putting defendant’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search. The name “Red” was seen on the screen. There was independent probable cause for the cell phone warrant. United States v. Hudson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14952 (E.D. Mo. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

OH5: When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed

When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed. State v. Alexander, 2025-Ohio-236 (4th Dist. Jan. 23, 2025). In an animal seizure case, state law requires a post-seizure administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH5: When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed

WA: Long on vehicle protective sweeps not overruled by Gant

Michigan v. Long on protective sweeps of vehicles when a weapon is reasonably feared was not overruled by Gant. State v. Howard, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 151 (Jan. 28, 2025). The protective sweep would have been invalid but for valid … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Long on vehicle protective sweeps not overruled by Gant

TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

When evaluating an officer’s use of force in responding to a domestic and road rage call involving a weapon, it is considered a serious crime. The use of force here was reasonable. Holland v. Cheatham Cty., 2025 Tenn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force