Monthly Archives: June 2021

CA7: Other officers bringing drug dog didn’t extend the stop

“The district court here found that Cowick detained Gholston only long enough to complete these same procedures, and that the dog alerted before Cowick had finished printing the second ticket. This is not a case in which an officer completes … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Other officers bringing drug dog didn’t extend the stop

CA10: Noting circuit split, there was PC here for entry under Payton “reason to believe” standard

There was probable cause to believe defendant was in his travel trailer for an entry under Payton. The court notes a circuit split. United States v. Maley, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17644 (10th Cir. June 14, 2021):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA10: Noting circuit split, there was PC here for entry under Payton “reason to believe” standard

WaPo: The secret gag orders must stop

WaPo: The secret gag orders must stop by Brad Smith, President of Microsoft (“The past seven days marked another bad week for the collision between technology and democracy. We live in an era when private emails and text messages typically … Continue reading

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on WaPo: The secret gag orders must stop

D.Kan.: Geofence warrants have to satisfy the particularity requirement

A geofence warrant has to be narrowly tailored for particularity. Here, the government sought identifying information about what cell phones were in a government building. (The building, crime, and date of the occurrence are not disclosed.) In re Info. That … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Geofence warrants have to satisfy the particularity requirement

Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr

Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr, 134 Harv. L. Rev. 905 (2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr

N.D.Ohio: Def’s suppression motion loss precludes his § 1983 case on same issue

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint that OnStar allegedly illegally tracked his vehicle was already decided against him in his criminal case. The issue is precluded here. Lenhart v. Savetski, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109462 (N.D. Ohio June 11, 2021). The collection … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s suppression motion loss precludes his § 1983 case on same issue

CA4: “Is there anything illegal in the vehicle” didn’t extend traffic stop

“Is there anything illegal in the vehicle” didn’t extend this traffic stop. United States v. Buzzard, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17518 (4th Cir. June 11, 2021):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: “Is there anything illegal in the vehicle” didn’t extend traffic stop

CA3: Questions beyond travel plans may unreasonably extend a stop, but here not

Questions about travel plans aren’t unreasonable during a traffic stop. Followup questions, however, would have been unreasonable, but for there already being reasonable suspicion. United States v. Segovia, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17479 (3d Cir. June 11, 2021):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Questions beyond travel plans may unreasonably extend a stop, but here not

AF: Search of house in murder case was reasonable and with PC in attempting to show the relationship between deceased and def

Defendant is an airman convicted at a court martial of premeditated murder of his girlfriend and unborn child. The search of his house was proper because it was reasonable to believe that evidence of their relationship would be found there … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on AF: Search of house in murder case was reasonable and with PC in attempting to show the relationship between deceased and def

M.D.Ala.: Post-conviction petitioner has to show he told defense counsel of facts and issues not raised

When challenging defense counsel’s failure to raise an issue in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, it behooves the defendant to show that defense counsel was told about the issue. Defendant here was aware of the alleged fact he complains … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Post-conviction petitioner has to show he told defense counsel of facts and issues not raised

NY3: No REP in pretrial detainees’ jail calls

There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in jail telephone calls for pretrial detainees because the inmates were warned. “To the extent that defendant argues that the admission of the phone calls violated his rights because he was being held … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in pretrial detainees’ jail calls

W.D.Pa.: Hot pursuit justified entry into def’s house

Highly specific and accurate information from a 911 call about a man with heroin and a gun in a blue drawstring bag in an area known for on-the-street drug deals and violent crimes brought police. Defendant matched the description. There … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Hot pursuit justified entry into def’s house

CA6: Protective sweep under a couch was reasonable

The government showed that a protective sweep under a couch was reasonably justified in looking for a person. United States v. Vanhook, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17245 (6th Cir. June 10, 2021). The contents of recorded jail telephone calls coupled … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Protective sweep under a couch was reasonable

D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Where the officers impermissibly delayed obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone, the good faith exception does not apply. The initial seizure of the phone was valid because it was left at a crime scene. United States v. Tisdol, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

E.D.Wisc.: Domestic abuse victim bleeding outside had apparent authority to consent to entry and search

A domestic abuse victim police encountered bleeding outside had apparent authority to consent to an entry and search of the property. As the police came up, she said “He beat me bad this time.” Quintero v. Vega, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wisc.: Domestic abuse victim bleeding outside had apparent authority to consent to entry and search

Reason: Gorsuch Pushes Stronger Fourth Amendment Protections

Reason: Gorsuch Pushes Stronger Fourth Amendment Protections by Damon Root (“Can a cop enter a suspect’s home without a warrant if they’re in pursuit and have probable cause to believe the suspect has committed a misdemeanor?”):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit | Comments Off on Reason: Gorsuch Pushes Stronger Fourth Amendment Protections

CA6: Second officer’s running wants and warrants on passenger didn’t delay the first officer’s stop

A second officer running warrants on detainees from a justified vehicle stop did not have anything to do with the original mission of the stop. “Officer Hogan questioned the passenger while Officer Holland dealt with Brewer, and we do not … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Second officer’s running wants and warrants on passenger didn’t delay the first officer’s stop

LATimes: FBI wants to keep fortune in cash, gold, jewels from Beverly Hills raid. Is it abuse of power?

LATimes: FBI wants to keep fortune in cash, gold, jewels from Beverly Hills raid. Is it abuse of power? by Michael Finnegan (“When FBI agents asked for permission to rip hundreds of safe deposit boxes from the walls of a … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on LATimes: FBI wants to keep fortune in cash, gold, jewels from Beverly Hills raid. Is it abuse of power?

Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode?

Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode? by Robert J. Anello & Richard F. Albert (“When law enforcement seeks to compel a subject to provide a passcode to allow them to rummage through a cellphone, courts have … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode?

Forbes: Cop Who Led Accidental No-Knock Raid Against 78-Year-Old Grandfather Can’t Be Sued, Court Rules

Forbes: Cop Who Led Accidental No-Knock Raid Against 78-Year-Old Grandfather Can’t Be Sued, Court Rules by Nick Sibilla (“It was a police raid John Oliver called ‘almost cartoonishly idiotic.’ Looking to apprehend a violent drug dealer at his home in … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Forbes: Cop Who Led Accidental No-Knock Raid Against 78-Year-Old Grandfather Can’t Be Sued, Court Rules