Monthly Archives: February 2021

IA: Reasonable inference owner of car was driving where owner had a suspended DL

It was a reasonable inference that the owner of a vehicle with a suspended license was driving when the vehicle was seen because the officer’s experience [and commonsense by now] shows that persons with suspended licenses continue to drive. That … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Reasonable inference owner of car was driving where owner had a suspended DL

KY: Deputy in one county could go to another to investigate; no motion to suppress lies for statutory violation, if there even was one

A motion to suppress for a statutory violation doesn’t work in Kentucky absent a constitutional violation to found it on. Here, a deputy from one county crossed into another county to investigate. The statute defendant relies on deals with arrest, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Exclusionary rule, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on KY: Deputy in one county could go to another to investigate; no motion to suppress lies for statutory violation, if there even was one

LA1: Failure to include SW materials in record requires affirmance

Failure to include all the search warrant materials in the appellate record requires affirmance of that sole issue on appeal. “Relator failed to include copies of documents that would assist with addressing his complaint including the motion to suppress, the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Standards of review | Comments Off on LA1: Failure to include SW materials in record requires affirmance

FL5: Compelled production of cell phone passcode was moot point for lack of prejudice

Defendant claims she was forced to give up her cell phone passcode in violation of the Fifth Amendment would state a ground for reversal in this Florida district, but she doesn’t show what came from the phone into the trial. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on FL5: Compelled production of cell phone passcode was moot point for lack of prejudice

HI: No PC shown for blood search warrant; no alcohol smell and disorientation was likely from head trauma

The state did not attempt to exhaust any possibilities that defendant’s disorientation wasn’t caused by likely head trauma because there was no probable cause otherwise that defendant had consumed alcohol. The search warrant for blood should not have issued. State … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on HI: No PC shown for blood search warrant; no alcohol smell and disorientation was likely from head trauma

NY: SW for premises did not include vehicle parked there for which separate PC wasn’t shown

Defendant was long under surveillance for drug deals, and a search warrant was obtained for his person and premises. It did not include his vehicles. The search authorization did not encompass his vehicle on the premises outside the house, and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on NY: SW for premises did not include vehicle parked there for which separate PC wasn’t shown

OH8: Defense counsel made logical choice to forego suppression for benefit to merits of case

Defense counsel made a logical choice to exploit certain facts from the search in defense on the merits. “Given the tumultuous relationship between Lucas and Parker, given the fact that she shot at him through a door, given his admitted … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Defense counsel made logical choice to forego suppression for benefit to merits of case

D.D.C.: Voluntarily providing iPhone passcode during proffer not immune act

Defendant’s providing his iPhone passcode during his proffer session did not immunize the contents of the phone from the government’s use at trial. Kastigar hearing (a misnomer) denied. United States v. Otunyo, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30000 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Voluntarily providing iPhone passcode during proffer not immune act

OK Indian territory, McGirt v. Oklahoma, and the GFE

For a century, state officers investigated offenses on land that McGirt v. Oklahoma found were actually Indian lands. The good faith exception applies. The officer couldn’t have been expected to know that SCOTUS would finally hold as it did, and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OK Indian territory, McGirt v. Oklahoma, and the GFE

S.D.N.Y.: Brady violation included govt’s review of “raw state search warrant returns” disclosed during trial

The government disclosed an exculpatory document during trial and buried in a disclosure of previously disclosed information. “Astonishingly, even in its latest filings, the Government has informed the Court of yet another failure of disclosure in this case related to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Brady violation included govt’s review of “raw state search warrant returns” disclosed during trial

N.D.Ohio: Impoundment under SOP was reasonable even though owner was present

Impoundment of defendant’s vehicle was reasonable and under standardized procedure, even though he was present. “I conclude Directive 406.3/2.3.4 was a reasonable standardized procedure. The officers’ decision to enforce Directive 406.2/2.3.4 and impound the vehicle, even though the lawful owner … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Impoundment under SOP was reasonable even though owner was present

CA1: Controlled buys were RS for a later stop

“Based on the previous controlled drug sales in which agents had seen Ochan participate — including the sale that day — agents had specific knowledge that Ochan sold drugs. From there, the sequence of events on the day of Tom’s … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA1: Controlled buys were RS for a later stop

S.D.Ohio: Def not entitled to return of property deemed “classified”

Defendant is not entitled to return of property that the government has deemed “classified.” United States v. Montgomery, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29115 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2021) (“In re Search Warrant for the Person of John F. Gill, 2014 … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def not entitled to return of property deemed “classified”

IL: Rodriguez was not a new rule of law; it restated Caballes

Rodriguez was not a new rule of law; it restated Caballes. The state doesn’t get the benefit of the good faith exception by pointing to it. “At the outset, we note that the State acknowledges that the trial court erred … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Rodriguez was not a new rule of law; it restated Caballes

IA: Oral permission to amend SW to correct address of place to be searched made SW particular

When the executing officers arrived at the place of search, they realized that the particular description of the place to be searched was wrong. The affiant (apparently) called the issuing judge and got permission to amend the warrant’s place to … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on IA: Oral permission to amend SW to correct address of place to be searched made SW particular

PA: Because of MMJ, smell of marijuana alone not RS or PC without more

The trial court’s order finding probable cause to search a car just based on the smell of marijuana alone from the passenger compartment is contrary to two state decisions involving medical marijuana and is reversed. Commonwealth v. Shaw, 2021 Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Because of MMJ, smell of marijuana alone not RS or PC without more

CA9: California negligent excessive force law broader than 4A; ptf stated claim

California negligence law permits negligent excessive force actions where the Fourth Amendment might not. Plaintiff adequately stated and supported a claim for a police shooting death of a mentally ill man. Tabares v. City of Huntington Beach, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: California negligent excessive force law broader than 4A; ptf stated claim

Reason: Civil Forfeiture Does Not Seem To Reduce Drug Use or Help Fight Crime

Reason: Civil Forfeiture Does Not Seem To Reduce Drug Use or Help Fight Crime by Jacob Sullen (“A new study provides further evidence that property seizures are driven by financial motives rather than public safety concerns.”) Contingent fee law enforcement?

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Civil Forfeiture Does Not Seem To Reduce Drug Use or Help Fight Crime

IA: Terry stop questioning doesn’t require a Miranda warning until it gets confrontational

Terry stop questioning doesn’t require a Miranda warning until it gets confrontational and adversarial and the detainee isn’t free to leave. State v. Decanini-Hernandez, 2021 Iowa App. LEXIS 172 (Feb. 17, 2021). Defense counsel wasn’t shown to be ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: Terry stop questioning doesn’t require a Miranda warning until it gets confrontational

D.N.H.: Police working forced security in a bar open area aren’t violating 4A

Plaintiffs run a bar, and they complain they were required to have police on duty and in the premises on certain nights. Without an allegation that the officers entered any part of the business that is private [such as an … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Police working forced security in a bar open area aren’t violating 4A