Monthly Archives: December 2019

E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

There was probable cause defendant was a major player in a DTO, and that his participation went on for months. This, he concedes, undermines his staleness argument. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211403 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Length of def’s participation in DTO undermines his staleness argument

E.D.N.C.: Officers came to the door with PC but no warrant; def’s shutting door and moving around inside led officers to believe he was destroying evidence, and entry was justified

When officers came to the door with probable cause for the presence of marijuana, defendant’s shutting the door and moving about inside for up to 90 seconds created apprehension that he was destroying evidence. Also, there was at least reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Officers came to the door with PC but no warrant; def’s shutting door and moving around inside led officers to believe he was destroying evidence, and entry was justified

CA6: Dodging the question when asked about a weapon during an investigative detention added to RS

Defendant allegedly had a motive to be violent, and, when officers asked him about whether he was armed, he dodged the question. The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that there was reasonable suspicion for the intrusion. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Dodging the question when asked about a weapon during an investigative detention added to RS

W.D.Va.: Ongoing DV disturbance is exigency for a warrantless entry

“When Officer Hill entered Gates’s home, he held the reasonable belief that a violent domestic disturbance was ongoing, and that a woman was present in the residence and involved in the disturbance. This gave rise to a reasonable belief in … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Ongoing DV disturbance is exigency for a warrantless entry

NV: OT: Relying on Kyllo, a digital blog is covered by the newpaperman’s privilege in confidential sources

Off topic, but significant: A digital news blog is covered by the nearly 50-year-old Nevada statute on protecting news sources and under the anti-SLAPP statute. Relying on Kyllo, the court finds that new technology has to be recognized under existing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NV: OT: Relying on Kyllo, a digital blog is covered by the newpaperman’s privilege in confidential sources

D.Kan.: Consent search of truck led to PC it was hauling a lot of cash; use of a drill then to try to find it was reasonable

Defendant was stopped and consented to a search of his truck. The consent search led to probable cause to believe the truck was transporting a lot of cash. Using a drill to find the cash was reasonable once there was … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Consent search of truck led to PC it was hauling a lot of cash; use of a drill then to try to find it was reasonable

LA4: Def’s entering and leaving a drug house wasn’t RS on its own

“Turning to the facts of this case, we also find the officer’s observation of defendant entering and exiting a residence that was reasonably suspected as being used for narcotics transactions to be insufficient to support a reasonable suspicion of participation … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: Def’s entering and leaving a drug house wasn’t RS on its own

AR: Prosecutor also didn’t know for a year that an HBO documentary crew was present at search; no discovery violation on SW materials

About a year after the execution of the search warrant, the parties learned that an HBO documentary crew recording Meth Storm was along for the search. Citing Layne v. Wilson and Brady, the defense sought access to the video and … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AR: Prosecutor also didn’t know for a year that an HBO documentary crew was present at search; no discovery violation on SW materials

CA4: Police could warrantlessly seize CSLI for cell phone abandoned in flight from the police

Defendant consciously was abandoning his property as he was trying to elude police who were chasing him on foot. He tossed everything, including his cell phone. Getting the CSLI for the abandoned phone without a warrant was reasonable, too. United … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on CA4: Police could warrantlessly seize CSLI for cell phone abandoned in flight from the police

CA6: There was already RS to detain the occupants of the car when def fled from it

“In total, we find that there was reasonable suspicion to block the white Saturn into the driveway. Taking together the smell of marijuana in an area known for drug violations, the person leaning into the car, and the car’s backing … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: There was already RS to detain the occupants of the car when def fled from it

N.D.Ind.: Parole search waiver applies to CSLI information

CSLI can be obtained from a parolee’s cell phone without a search warrant. “However, the Court’s own research has found that every circuit court faced with the same question has sided with the Government and found that a warrant is … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Parole search waiver applies to CSLI information

D.Minn.: Broad SW in tax investigation on one false return justified breadth of SW because it was likely other taxes were not paid, too

The nature of the probable cause and when it was found was justification for broad search warrant for records in a tax investigation. “But, unlike in Rickert, the investigation in this case began with broader data collected by the IRS … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Overbreadth | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Broad SW in tax investigation on one false return justified breadth of SW because it was likely other taxes were not paid, too

E.D.Cal.: Motion for return of things denied until 2255 resolved

Defendant seeks return of things of potential evidentiary value. The government opposes on the ground that a 2255 has not yet been filed, and the things might still have value. That’s reasonable for the court. United States v. Saldivar, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Motion for return of things denied until 2255 resolved

D.D.C.: Govt doesn’t show PC to connect defs to weapons to force DNA swabs

“A federal grand jury indicted Corry Blue Evans and various members of his family on multiple offenses including extortion, money laundering, and bank fraud. Pending before the Court is the government’s motion for an order to compel Corry Blue Evans … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Govt doesn’t show PC to connect defs to weapons to force DNA swabs

OH5: RS ended when the driver turned out not to be the wanted owner, and further detention was without RS

When reasonable suspicion evaporated with the fact that the driver of the vehicle was not the owner for whom there was a warrant out, the stop should have ended. State v. Brentlinger, 2019-Ohio-4989, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5073 (5th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS ended when the driver turned out not to be the wanted owner, and further detention was without RS

Cal.: Privately recorded conversation in violation of state law admissible in a criminal case under 1982’s Proposition 8

A private party recorded a telephone call with defendant admitting a criminal sex act. Proposition 8 on “Truth in Evidence” adopted by voters in 1982 made the exclusionary rule follow the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. The legislature amended it by … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Private search | Comments Off on Cal.: Privately recorded conversation in violation of state law admissible in a criminal case under 1982’s Proposition 8

NYTimes: Strip-Searching of 8-Year-Old at Prison Leads Virginia to Halt the Practice

NYTimes: Strip-Searching of 8-Year-Old at Prison Leads Virginia to Halt the Practice (“Gov. Ralph Northam suspended the policy after a girl was strip-searched while trying to visit her father.”) And I lost a case similar to this about 18 years … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on NYTimes: Strip-Searching of 8-Year-Old at Prison Leads Virginia to Halt the Practice

NY1: SW for cell phone overbroad; no justification for searching photographs

The search warrant for the contents of defendant’s cell phone was overbroad because there was no justification for the breadth of search. This was a sex abuse case, but there was never any indication defendant possessed child pornography on the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Overbreadth | Comments Off on NY1: SW for cell phone overbroad; no justification for searching photographs

IN: Seizure of def’s vehicle off the street when police found it after a hit and run was valid under the automobile exception

“P1 Following a May 2017 hit and run in Indianapolis that left a pedestrian dead, Dennis Payne Jr. was convicted of Level 5 felony failure to remain at the scene of an accident resulting in death and Level 6 felony … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on IN: Seizure of def’s vehicle off the street when police found it after a hit and run was valid under the automobile exception

DC: Telling def to put his hands on the wall for a patdown was a seizure and wasn’t consensual

Telling defendant to put his hands against the wall and assume the position for a patdown was a seizure, and here it was without probable cause. It was not consensual. Dozier v. United States, 2019 D.C. App. LEXIS 495 (Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DC: Telling def to put his hands on the wall for a patdown was a seizure and wasn’t consensual