Daily Archives: November 3, 2019

Philadelphia Inquirer: Philadelphia police are searching more cars for marijuana — but finding less of it, critics say

Philadelphia Inquirer: Philadelphia police are searching more cars for marijuana — but finding less of it, critics say (“Though Philadelphia has effectively decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana — and close to 200,000 Pennsylvania residents now have medical marijuana … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on Philadelphia Inquirer: Philadelphia police are searching more cars for marijuana — but finding less of it, critics say

NY3: Working meth lab provided exigency for warrantless entry

Officers went to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk based on a tip he had a working meth lab. When they knocked, he ran out the back door. The officer positioned there shouted for him to stop and drop what … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NY3: Working meth lab provided exigency for warrantless entry

NE: Where the smell of MJ justifies the search, the finding of a small quantity doesn’t require the search end

Defendant’s stop was for over-tinted windows. The officer could smell burnt marijuana, and he searched finding some in the console. Finding that, he was not obligated to stop searching. State v. Valentine, 27 Neb. App. 332, 2019 Neb. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on NE: Where the smell of MJ justifies the search, the finding of a small quantity doesn’t require the search end

OH8: Realtime CSLI was used only to locate def; nothing to suppress

Defendant was called by the police for an interview about a child molestation accusation, and he agreed to meet. He didn’t show. Then the police were concerned maybe he was fleeing and they sought realtime CSLI to locate him. “We … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: Realtime CSLI was used only to locate def; nothing to suppress

E.D.Wis.: Handgun hidden in a dog house wasn’t subject to search for exigency

Defendant’s handgun was hidden in a doghouse on the curtilage. The court distinguishes other cases allowing a search for a firearm, particularly one where a loaded shotgun was publicly put in the trunk of a car and the keys left … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Handgun hidden in a dog house wasn’t subject to search for exigency

E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

Defendant’s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019). The affidavit for … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

Plaintiff can’t bring a Fourth Amendment Bivens claim against the United States because of sovereign immunity. There is always FTCA, but it has prerequisites. Leave to amend granted. Whitaker v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188071 (D. N.J. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.N.J.: US can’t be sued under Bivens

NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

Defendant filed his motion to suppress in the blind because didn’t have access to the affidavit for the search warrant. It was denied without a hearing. Remanded: He gets to see it to try to controvert it. People v. Lambey, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

Arguable probable cause supported plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest, but there is a factual dispute denying qualified immunity to the officers of where exactly the arrest started and how it ended up indoors. That remains for trial. The complaint also survives on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

CA3: State law required RS for a parole search

Defendant was a parolee, and the parties argued over whether no suspicion was required for a parole search or reasonable suspicion. The government argued no suspicion required. The parole conditions didn’t specify, but state statute did, and reasonable suspicion is … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA3: State law required RS for a parole search