Daily Archives: November 20, 2019

WaPo: Police can keep Ring camera video forever and share with whomever they’d like, Amazon tells senator

WaPo: Police can keep Ring camera video forever and share with whomever they’d like, Amazon tells senator

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Police can keep Ring camera video forever and share with whomever they’d like, Amazon tells senator

D.N.M.: Brady material doesn’t have to be disclosed for suppression hearings

Brady material doesn’t have to be disclosed for suppression hearings. [How does this fit with the ethical obligation to not present false evidence? See Model Rules 3.3 & 3.4. Brady material might not make a difference in suppression hearing; then, … Continue reading

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Brady material doesn’t have to be disclosed for suppression hearings

WaPo: ‘I got my rights to do anything I want to do’: Officer immediately fired after viral video shows him stopping black shoppers for ‘acting suspicious’ [Spending money while black]

WaPo: ‘I got my rights to do anything I want to do’: Officer immediately fired after viral video shows him stopping black shoppers for ‘acting suspicious’ by Allyson Chiu

Posted in Police misconduct, Pretext | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘I got my rights to do anything I want to do’: Officer immediately fired after viral video shows him stopping black shoppers for ‘acting suspicious’ [Spending money while black]

OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification

During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, the state constitution prohibits asking for consent without further justification. State v. Arreola-Botello, 365 Ore. 695, 2019 Ore. LEXIS 794 (Nov. 15, 2019), aff’g 292 Ore. App. 214, 418 P.3d 785 (2018) … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: During the “unavoidable lull” in a traffic stop, state constitution prohibits asking for consent without justification