Monthly Archives: October 2019

E.D.Mich.: Court doesn’t believe officer on inventory as a justification, but impoundment of the vehicle would have happened anyway

“Defendant David Arnold was arrested for and charged with possession of a firearm by a felon after the Detroit police found a stolen handgun in the glovebox of the car he was driving. The police stopped the car because the … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Court doesn’t believe officer on inventory as a justification, but impoundment of the vehicle would have happened anyway

Just Security: The FISA Court’s 702 Opinions, Part I: A History of Non-Compliance Repeats Itself

Just Security: The FISA Court’s 702 Opinions, Part I: A History of Non-Compliance Repeats Itself by Elizabeth Goitein:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Just Security: The FISA Court’s 702 Opinions, Part I: A History of Non-Compliance Repeats Itself

N.D.Cal.: Search of car violated Rodriguez and product of that search led to suppression of SW for house

Defendant’s stop was unreasonably prolonged and violated Rodriguez. The product of that search was used to get a search warrant for the house. The search of the house is suppressed, too. United States v. Maffei, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177755 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Search of car violated Rodriguez and product of that search led to suppression of SW for house

MN: A white cloth sought in a SW for evidence of sexual assault permitted seizure of a blue and white one

Defendant was accused of sexual assault, and a “white dish towel-like cloth” was likely a source of DNA evidence. A search warrant was obtained. Executing the warrant, officers saw a blue and white dish-towel-like cloth. The trial court suppressed it. … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on MN: A white cloth sought in a SW for evidence of sexual assault permitted seizure of a blue and white one

The Nation: Google Is Coming for Your Face

The Nation: Google Is Coming for Your Face (“Personal data is routinely harvested from the most vulnerable populations, without transparency, regulation, or principles—and this should concern us all.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Nation: Google Is Coming for Your Face

D.Mont.: Incidents leading to SW doesn’t necessarily make them relevant for trial; motion in limine granted

Prior incidents led to the search warrant here, but that doesn’t make them admissible in this trial. Motion in limine granted. United States v. Knapp, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177213 (D. Mont. Oct. 11, 2019). The plaintiff didn’t overcome the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Incidents leading to SW doesn’t necessarily make them relevant for trial; motion in limine granted

AZ: Presenting a consent form after def lawyers-up doesn’t violate Miranda

Defendant was Mirandized, and she lawyered up. She was presented with a consent form for her cell phone with the understanding that if she didn’t consent they’d get a search warrant. She didn’t ask for a lawyer, and she consented. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent | Comments Off on AZ: Presenting a consent form after def lawyers-up doesn’t violate Miranda

D.Nev.: Email SW limited to a date range and containing keywords was particular

Email search warrant limited to a date range and containing keywords was particular. United States v. Cariani, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177059 (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2019):

Posted in E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Email SW limited to a date range and containing keywords was particular

CA6: One prior excessive force claim isn’t pattern and practice in a § 1983 case

One other excessive force claim investigated by the City is not evidence of pattern and practice or failure to train. Stewart v. City of Memphis, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 30491 (6th Cir. Oct. 11, 2019).* Defendant’s successor 2255 also raises … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: One prior excessive force claim isn’t pattern and practice in a § 1983 case

TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

Defendant’s alleged possession of methamphetamine in his truck many months earlier was not probable cause to believe it could still be there at the time of the search. Defendant’s possession of a meth pipe, however, gave cause to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on TN: Possession of meth in truck many months earlier wasn’t PC to believe it’s there now

CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

“Merely alleging that Jones’ conducting pat-down searches ‘without a legitimate reason’ is insufficient to state a plausible claim of a Fourth Amendment violation. Under the Fourth Amendment, ‘[t]he touchstone of whether a given search or seizure is reasonable is whether … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

FL5: CI rented car for def to commit a robbery; told police and they put GPS on car; stop was with PC

The CI had knowledge defendant was going to commit a robbery and was enlisted to rent a car for it. The CI told the police, and they planted a GPS on the car with the CI’s permission. After the robbery, … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on FL5: CI rented car for def to commit a robbery; told police and they put GPS on car; stop was with PC

MD: License plate reader’s alert of lack of insurance was RS for stop

The trooper’s license plate reader scan showed defendant’s vehicle had no insurance on file. That was reasonable suspicion for the stop. Gary v. State, 2019 Md. App. LEXIS 870 (Oct. 9, 2019). Also,

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: License plate reader’s alert of lack of insurance was RS for stop

Miami Herald: Miami Police to purchase spyware to trace and monitor phones and social media

Miami Herald: Miami Police to purchase spyware to trace and monitor phones and social media by Jack Brooke (“The Miami Police Department will soon have its own surveillance technology to track and monitor phone calls and social media messages.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Miami Herald: Miami Police to purchase spyware to trace and monitor phones and social media

E.D.Pa.: Protective sweep was properly limited and cell phones in plain view could be seized if it was readily apparent they were evidence

The officers’ protective sweep was justified by the facts, and it was constrained to areas large enough to hide a person. In plain view were two cell phones that were properly seized and then later searched with a warrant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Protective sweep was properly limited and cell phones in plain view could be seized if it was readily apparent they were evidence

S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

Defendant’s stop for parking near a dilapidated maybe abandoned structure was reasonable because the officers were justified in inquiring who he was and what he was doing. In their experience, this activity supported at least an inference that defendant might … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: It was reasonable to stop defendant and inquire where def was parked next to a dilapidated building

N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

The search warrant said that is should be executed “immediately,” but officers waited two days to coordinate with the multiple agencies involved. Rule 41(e) says “execute the warrant within a specified time no longer than 14 days.” At worse, this … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

OH8: SW was for all of a multifamily dwelling, only one unit was occupied; it was particular

The search warrant referred to the premises to be searched as “5243/45 Broadway.” It was one continuous apartment downstairs with one address, and the other upstairs was still being built and was occupied. 5243 was used on the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH8: SW was for all of a multifamily dwelling, only one unit was occupied; it was particular

N.D.Ind.: Arrest outside motel room still permitted protective sweep where there was RS someone else was there

Defendant was arrested outside his motel room, but that did not bar a protective sweep of the motel room where the officers had reason to believe others could be present. Baldwin v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175253 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Arrest outside motel room still permitted protective sweep where there was RS someone else was there

D.Minn.: Def was a parole absconder with a cell phone; PC existed for a warrant for a ping of the cell phone to find him

Defendant was a state parole absconder, and the officers got a warrant for a tracking order on the phone to find him, and it was issued with probable cause he’d be found with his phone. In any event, the good … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def was a parole absconder with a cell phone; PC existed for a warrant for a ping of the cell phone to find him