Daily Archives: October 22, 2019

E.D.Wis.: “the issue is not whether the affiant omitted information the issuing judge may have found relevant; rather, the focus is on the affiant’s state of mind.”

“As indicated, however, the issue is not whether the affiant omitted information the issuing judge may have found relevant; rather, the focus is on the affiant’s state of mind. United States v. Jones, 208 F.3d 603, 607 (7th Cir. 2000). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: “the issue is not whether the affiant omitted information the issuing judge may have found relevant; rather, the focus is on the affiant’s state of mind.”

OK: Officer’s excuse for extending the stop was pretext and violated Rodriguez

The officer’s claim that defendant’s log book wasn’t up to date was a mere pretext and subterfuge to unreasonably continue the stop in violation of Rodriguez. State v. Morgan, 2019 OK CR 26, 2019 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OK: Officer’s excuse for extending the stop was pretext and violated Rodriguez

W.D.Ky.: Stop of one suspect created exigency that occupants might destroy evidence; entry justified

The stop of one suspect created exigent circumstances for entry into the premises to freeze it until a warrant could be obtained. The police reasonably feared that occupants would learn of the stop and destroy evidence. On entry, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Stop of one suspect created exigency that occupants might destroy evidence; entry justified

N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

Defendant did not own the premises searched, but he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in it because of his connection to it. Also, criminal acts on the premises is not a waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy. Minnesota … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Criminal acts on premises is not a waiver of a REP in it

N.D.Iowa: Std of review of PC for a warrant is not de novo

The standard of review of probable cause for a search warrant is not de novo—it’s whether there is a substantial basis for believing that evidence would be found. Here, “Although some of the information lacked detail, the volume and corroboration … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Std of review of PC for a warrant is not de novo

W.D.Tenn.: Putting a wildlife camera on ptf’s open fields wasn’t a violation of the 4A

Officers putting a wildlife camera on plaintiff’s open fields wasn’t a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Hollingsworth v. Tenn. Wildlife Res. Agency, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181311 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 21, 2019):

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Putting a wildlife camera on ptf’s open fields wasn’t a violation of the 4A

MA well explains the totality of circumstances test applied to police-citizen contacts

Massachusetts well explains the totality of circumstances test applied to what a civilian would find an inherently coercive police citizen contact but the courts hardly ever do. Commonwealth v. Matta, 2019 Mass. LEXIS 582 (Oct. 21, 2019):

Posted in Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA well explains the totality of circumstances test applied to police-citizen contacts

GA: Retrieval of data from airbag control module after car wreck was search requiring warrant

Warrantless retrieval of data from the airbag control module (ACM) from a vehicle after a car crash was a search that required a warrant. Mobley v. State, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 694 (Oct. 21, 2019).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on GA: Retrieval of data from airbag control module after car wreck was search requiring warrant

W.D.La.: Dismissal of indictment is not remedy for DEA allegedly violating its policy manual, even if it did

Defendant’s general allegation that the DEA officers violated their own policy manual isn’t specific and doesn’t even rise to the level of dismissal of the indictment, which is what he alleges. “Indeed, the Supreme Court has held that violations of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dismissal of indictment is not remedy for DEA allegedly violating its policy manual, even if it did