N.D.Cal.: Search of car violated Rodriguez and product of that search led to suppression of SW for house

Defendant’s stop was unreasonably prolonged and violated Rodriguez. The product of that search was used to get a search warrant for the house. The search of the house is suppressed, too. United States v. Maffei, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177755 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2019).*

Defendant’s motion to suppress should be denied on the merits because he fled from police, and he wasn’t seized until he laid down and submitted. Then he filed a motion to withdraw the motion and pled. Granted. United States v. Smith, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177720 (E.D. Tenn. Sept. 18, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.