Monthly Archives: May 2019

E.D.N.Y.: Computer search for CP can lead to legitimate plain view

In a computer search for child pornography, reviewing the computer files can easily lead to a plain view. “The agents were permitted to ‘engage in a cursory review of files [in the folder dated 2005], by opening them, to determine … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Computer search for CP can lead to legitimate plain view

N.D.Okla.: Merely stating affidavit for SW was “false and misleading” doesn’t state a § 1983 civil Franks claim.

Merely stating that an affidavit for search warrant was “false and misleading” doesn’t state a § 1983 civil Franks claim. Affordable Bail Bonds v. Tulsa County Sheriff’s Office, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75411 (N.D. Okla. May 3, 2019). The respondent … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Merely stating affidavit for SW was “false and misleading” doesn’t state a § 1983 civil Franks claim.

S.D.Ga.: Heck explained in 4A terms

Explaining Heck: This case involves alleged illegally admitted statements, but it’s explained in terms of the Fourth Amendment. Edwards v. Perry, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74480 (S.D. Ga. May 3, 2019):

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Heck explained in 4A terms

E.D.Cal.: § 1983 4A prison claim is an attack against his disciplinary proceeding and barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s § 1983 Fourth Amendment prison claim is an attack against his disciplinary proceeding and barred by Heck. Lout v. Sidhu, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74550 (E.D. Cal. May 3, 2019).* Claimant has no standing to challenge the seizure before … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: § 1983 4A prison claim is an attack against his disciplinary proceeding and barred by Heck

D.Mass.: Airbnb has REP in nonpublic usage data for its rentals

“The Court finds Airbnb has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the nonpublic usage data for its listings—especially when paired with additional information such as the location of the unit—and that the City cannot lawfully require disclosure of that information … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Airbnb has REP in nonpublic usage data for its rentals

C.D.Cal.: Beverly Hills Airbnb unit disclosure ordinance isn’t barred by Patel

The City of Beverly Hills has an ordinance requiring registration of properties subject to rental through Airbnb. The Apartment Association attempts to analogize the information sought in City of Los Angeles v. Patel, but it doesn’t come near. “In sum, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Beverly Hills Airbnb unit disclosure ordinance isn’t barred by Patel

E.D.Pa.: Pro se ptf stated claim for abusive strip search in jail

Pro se prison plaintiff stated a claim for a strip search for in an improper purpose at least at the pleading stage. He also states a retaliation claim that another search occurred where the defendant referred to the lawsuit in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Pro se ptf stated claim for abusive strip search in jail

UT: Community caretaking function authorized stop of def asleep on McDonald’s parking lot at 3 am

Defendant was asleep in his car on a McDonald’s parking lot with the motor running after midnight in the winter. A McDonald’s employee finally got him awake and told him to leave. Defendant drove around the building and parked in … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on UT: Community caretaking function authorized stop of def asleep on McDonald’s parking lot at 3 am

CA6: Tracking warrant was issued with PC

The tracking warrant here was issued on probable cause. “Courts have upheld vehicle-tracking warrants based on much weaker factual allegations than these. See, e.g., United States v. Faulkner, 826 F.3d 1139, 1145 (8th Cir. 2016) (upholding a vehicle-tracking warrant where … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA6: Tracking warrant was issued with PC

IL: Kentucky officers investigated aggravated DUI with an accident on Ohio River bridge; remanded for findings of GFE

Defendant was involved in an accident on the Brookport Bridge between Illinois and Kentucky, and he was originally charged in Kentucky. On closer examination, the accident was determined to be in Illinois, so that case was dismissed, and it was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Kentucky officers investigated aggravated DUI with an accident on Ohio River bridge; remanded for findings of GFE

OH: Officers responding to nearby shots fired were justified in stop def, the only person around

Officers heard nearby gunshots and approached the only person in the vicinity with guns drawn and did a frisk of the person. The frisk was justified by reasonable suspicion, and drawing firearms didn’t convert the stop into a seizure. State … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Officers responding to nearby shots fired were justified in stop def, the only person around

MD: Maryland exclusionary rule and GFE applied to search in NJ for evidence of a MD murder

Defendant was a suspect in a Maryland murder case, and the state and USMs certainly had probable cause for him connecting him to the murder. Yet, the affidavit for the search warrant for property in New Jersey merely conclusorily stated … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws | Comments Off on MD: Maryland exclusionary rule and GFE applied to search in NJ for evidence of a MD murder

D.N.M.: SW for CP in house didn’t need to identify the person who was the target of the search

Officers had probable cause that child pornography came from a particular IP address that was linked to a street address. The search warrant was properly issued for the entire premises, and it did not need to list the target of … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: SW for CP in house didn’t need to identify the person who was the target of the search

Cal.4 dissent: Riley and Sansom require RS for cell phone probation search

Defendant was subjected to a probation search of a cell phone where the underlying crime had nothing to do with cell phones or the internet. The dissent believes that Riley and Sansom together require reasonable suspicion for a cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4 dissent: Riley and Sansom require RS for cell phone probation search

W.D.N.Y.: State SW issued for violation of state statute under federal injunction since 1997 should be suppressed

Defendant was federally indicted for possession of child pornography after a state search warrant for violation of state law. There was, however, a federal injunction from 1997 prohibiting prosecutions under a particular New York statute, but at least 11 people … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: State SW issued for violation of state statute under federal injunction since 1997 should be suppressed

M.D.Pa.: Typo in SW address overlooked under GFE

Typographical error in the search warrant (648 South 21st Street rather than 748 South 21st Street) would be overlooked under the good faith exception where the correct property was searched. United States v. Carey, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74140 (M.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Typo in SW address overlooked under GFE

WaPo Podcast: Police test facial recognition in Oregon. But privacy advocates have serious concerns.

WaPo Podcast: Police test facial recognition in Oregon. But privacy advocates have serious concerns. by Drew Harwell

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo Podcast: Police test facial recognition in Oregon. But privacy advocates have serious concerns.

S.D.N.Y.: Govt fails its burden of proof to show RS for a stop and frisk based on credibility of the officer; it was a hunch at best

Defendant was seen at 1 am in a high crime area on the street in the Bronx talking with three others. The officer claimed he could see him adjusting his waistband, suggesting a gun. Collectively, the court simply doesn’t believe … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt fails its burden of proof to show RS for a stop and frisk based on credibility of the officer; it was a hunch at best

NY2: “Defense counsel’s equivocal, vague and conclusory statements that defendant had standing to challenge the searches” has no offer of proof or facts

“The court correctly denied, on the ground of lack of standing as well as on the merits, defendant’s motion to controvert two search warrants. Defense counsel’s equivocal, vague and conclusory statements that defendant had standing to challenge the searches of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on NY2: “Defense counsel’s equivocal, vague and conclusory statements that defendant had standing to challenge the searches” has no offer of proof or facts

DE: The standard for abandonment is objective; actual disclaiming ownership not required

The standard for abandonment is objective. What do the facts show? Here, defendant left his backpack in a place where he could not keep an eye on it. Disclaiming ownership alone is not the test. Patton v. State, 2019 Del. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on DE: The standard for abandonment is objective; actual disclaiming ownership not required