Daily Archives: May 3, 2019

WaPo Podcast: Police test facial recognition in Oregon. But privacy advocates have serious concerns.

WaPo Podcast: Police test facial recognition in Oregon. But privacy advocates have serious concerns. by Drew Harwell

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo Podcast: Police test facial recognition in Oregon. But privacy advocates have serious concerns.

S.D.N.Y.: Govt fails its burden of proof to show RS for a stop and frisk based on credibility of the officer; it was a hunch at best

Defendant was seen at 1 am in a high crime area on the street in the Bronx talking with three others. The officer claimed he could see him adjusting his waistband, suggesting a gun. Collectively, the court simply doesn’t believe … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt fails its burden of proof to show RS for a stop and frisk based on credibility of the officer; it was a hunch at best

NY2: “Defense counsel’s equivocal, vague and conclusory statements that defendant had standing to challenge the searches” has no offer of proof or facts

“The court correctly denied, on the ground of lack of standing as well as on the merits, defendant’s motion to controvert two search warrants. Defense counsel’s equivocal, vague and conclusory statements that defendant had standing to challenge the searches of … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on NY2: “Defense counsel’s equivocal, vague and conclusory statements that defendant had standing to challenge the searches” has no offer of proof or facts

DE: The standard for abandonment is objective; actual disclaiming ownership not required

The standard for abandonment is objective. What do the facts show? Here, defendant left his backpack in a place where he could not keep an eye on it. Disclaiming ownership alone is not the test. Patton v. State, 2019 Del. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on DE: The standard for abandonment is objective; actual disclaiming ownership not required

E.D.Pa.: Def’s argument that cast PC for SW more as BRD “misapprehends the import and purpose of search warrants in two fundamental ways”

Defendant’s argument on lack of probable cause misses the mark because it’s cast in terms more like beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal activity and not merely probable cause. There was probable cause. United States v. Milliner, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def’s argument that cast PC for SW more as BRD “misapprehends the import and purpose of search warrants in two fundamental ways”

MT: An improperly certified police officer was still competent as a witness at a suppression hearing under Rule of Evid. 601, 602

An improperly certified police officer was still competent as a witness at a suppression hearing because all witnesses are generally competent to testify to what they saw. Rule of Evid. 601, 602. Under the totality of circumstances, there was probable … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MT: An improperly certified police officer was still competent as a witness at a suppression hearing under Rule of Evid. 601, 602

CA9: Recording pretrial detention inmates’ conversations for witness safety was reasonable

While defendants were in pretrial detention on a RICO indictment, the government apparently surreptitiously recorded conversations between them because there were legitimate witness safety concerns. The court finds no reasonable expectation of privacy in that situation. United States v. Ross, … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA9: Recording pretrial detention inmates’ conversations for witness safety was reasonable