Daily Archives: May 20, 2019

Education Week (blog): Justices Decline to Review Case Involving Strip Search of 4-Year-Old at School

Education Week (blog): Justices Decline to Review Case Involving Strip Search of 4-Year-Old at School by Mark Walsh:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, School searches, Strip search | Comments Off on Education Week (blog): Justices Decline to Review Case Involving Strip Search of 4-Year-Old at School

Observer: NJ Supreme Court Will Determine Whether Cops Can Force You to Unlock Your Mobile Device

Observer: NJ Supreme Court Will Determine Whether Cops Can Force You to Unlock Your Mobile Device by Donald Scarinci:

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Observer: NJ Supreme Court Will Determine Whether Cops Can Force You to Unlock Your Mobile Device

ND: Def’s arrangement for another to take possession of his package showed his standing

Defendant’s arrangement with another person to pickup his package showed his control over the package, and that gave him standing. State v. Gardner, 2019 ND 122, 2019 N.D. LEXIS 130 (May 16, 2019) (quoting Treatise § 3.13). “Vigen was not … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on ND: Def’s arrangement for another to take possession of his package showed his standing

CA5: GFE wasn’t raised or litigated below so it’s not considered on appeal

The district court’s findings on the search were not clearly erroneous. The good faith exception wasn’t raised in the district court, and not on appeal so it’s waived. United States v. Taylor, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14644 (5th Cir. May … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA5: GFE wasn’t raised or litigated below so it’s not considered on appeal

GA: Lack of a particularized motion to suppress didn’t preserve 4A claim for appeal

Defendant did not file a particularized motion to suppress, so he couldn’t raise the issue on appeal. State v. Walker, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 266 (May 17, 2019). Defendant’s statement during the course of the search of his house was … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on GA: Lack of a particularized motion to suppress didn’t preserve 4A claim for appeal

CA11: 33 day delay in getting SW for computer seized in CP investigation not 4A unreasonable

The government’s 33 day delay in getting a search warrant for defendant’s seized computer in a child porn case was found, although not ideal, not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Thomas v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14645 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: 33 day delay in getting SW for computer seized in CP investigation not 4A unreasonable

N.D.Cal.: 4A Bivens claims can’t be extended to corporations

“In sum, the Court finds that allowing corporations such as Life Savers to bring Bivens suits on behalf of employees is a new Bivens context, one for which there are other alternative remedial structures and one that implicates special factors … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 4A Bivens claims can’t be extended to corporations