Daily Archives: May 19, 2019

NJLJ: Editorial: Parking Space ‘Chalking’ Case Raises Questions on Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

NJLJ: Editorial: Parking Space ‘Chalking’ Case Raises Questions on Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: Technology is making universal surveillance of public spaces possible, and the right to be lost in the crowd will not depend on chalk. The real issue is not … Continue reading

Posted in Trespass | Comments Off on NJLJ: Editorial: Parking Space ‘Chalking’ Case Raises Questions on Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

NE: Expansive SW for cell phone in a shooting case with multiple participants was reasonable

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was expansive, but it was evidence in a shooting case where defendant and others were involved. Moreover, the good faith exception applied. State v. Goynes, 303 Neb. 129 (May 17, 2019):

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on NE: Expansive SW for cell phone in a shooting case with multiple participants was reasonable

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a pole camera’s view in a public place

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy as to a pole camera on business property in a public area. United States v. Gbenedio, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83682 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2019). The alleged fact of a telephone call … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a pole camera’s view in a public place

CA11: Def’s attempt to limit the scope of his consent search shows voluntariness

“Here, Knight knew that he had a firearm, ammunition, and drugs that he shouldn’t have. And his answer—telling the detective that he would consent to a search if she overlooked these items—was unconstrained by the detective’s question. Indeed, a simple … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA11: Def’s attempt to limit the scope of his consent search shows voluntariness

OK: State blood draw statute was suspect, but GFE applies

The state blood draw is constitutionally suspect, but the court doesn’t have to go there. The officer’s actions in relying on it was still good faith. Stewart v. State, 2019 OK CR 6, 2019 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OK: State blood draw statute was suspect, but GFE applies

WA: Blood was apparent in plain view on def’s clothing in hospital room

“¶1 David Morgan was convicted by a jury of first degree assault, attempted murder, and arson. A bloodstain pattern analysis performed on his clothing suggested he was in close proximity to the victim when she suffered her injuries. We must … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on WA: Blood was apparent in plain view on def’s clothing in hospital room

NY3: Officer’s subjective intent to search doesn’t matter where there was PC under automobile exception

The officer’s alleged subjective intent to search didn’t matter because there was justification under the automobile exception anyway. People v. HinesPeople v. HinesPeople v. Hines, 2019 NY Slip Op 03853, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3884 (3d Dept. May 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Pretext, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: Officer’s subjective intent to search doesn’t matter where there was PC under automobile exception

E.D.Tex.: Driver’s arrest justified impoundment and inventory under dept’s policy

“In this case, Defendant, the driver and sole occupant of the vehicle, had been arrested. It was likely the vehicle would be unattended for an extended period of time. Per department policy, the arresting officers caused the vehicle to be … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Driver’s arrest justified impoundment and inventory under dept’s policy

CA5: Civil rights suit over entry, search, seizure, and arrest implies invalidity of state conviction and were barred

“Thus, success on Weems’s unlawful entry, search, seizure, and arrest claims would necessarily imply the invalidity of his convictions. See Heck, 512 U.S. at 487; Hudson v. Hughes, 98 F.3d 868, 872 (5th Cir. 1996). Because Weems’s false reporting and … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on CA5: Civil rights suit over entry, search, seizure, and arrest implies invalidity of state conviction and were barred