Daily Archives: May 27, 2019

NPR: Political Fallout Escalates After SF Police Raid Journalist’s Office

NPR: Political Fallout Escalates After SF Police Raid Journalist’s Office by Sonja Hutson: The San Francisco Police Officers’ Association is calling on the chief of police to resign for his handling of a raid on a reporter’s home. The reporter … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on NPR: Political Fallout Escalates After SF Police Raid Journalist’s Office

OK: Without a specific challenge to overbreadth, trial court errs in deciding it

Defendant moved to suppress his cell phone search for lack of probable cause. He did not challenge the scope of the warrant. Therefore, the district court erred in deciding that the search warrant was overbroad. “The District Court erred when … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Overbreadth | Comments Off on OK: Without a specific challenge to overbreadth, trial court errs in deciding it

CA5: Byrd doesn’t give the passenger any more standing than he already didn’t have

Byrd doesn’t give the passenger any more standing than he already didn’t have. United States v. James, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 15531 (5th Cir. May 24, 2019). “Under our precedent that applied to the stop at issue, the officers’ use … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Byrd doesn’t give the passenger any more standing than he already didn’t have

OH10: Aside from the SW for def’s house, there was PC to stop him in his car leaving for his arrest

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s premises. Based on a controlled buy, there was also probable cause to independently stop him leaving his own house. State v. Taylor, 2019-Ohio-2018, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 2088 (10th Dist. May 23, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Aside from the SW for def’s house, there was PC to stop him in his car leaving for his arrest

CA11: 4A claim can’t be brought in a successor 2255

Defendant filed a successor 2255 over the alleged nonexistence of his search warrant, and this doesn’t state ground for a successor petition. “Even if Mallety had presented evidence that the search of the Eden Street apartment was conducted without a … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: 4A claim can’t be brought in a successor 2255