Monthly Archives: March 2019

E.D.Ky.: DUI checkpoint was properly set up for proper motives and was reasonable

“In sum, the record establishes that the checkpoint at which Mink was stopped was not implemented in an unreasonable fashion under the Fourth Amendment. Instead, the checkpoint ‘was clearly aimed at reducing the immediate hazard posed by the presence of … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: DUI checkpoint was properly set up for proper motives and was reasonable

E.D.Tex.: Def’s stop was in 2011 and he doesn’t get the benefit of 2015’s Rodriguez

“The search in the present case occurred in 2011. Hare’s focus on Rodriguez, which was issued in 2015, is misplaced. The Fifth Circuit has ‘repeatedly held that “there is no general duty on the part of defense counsel to anticipate … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Def’s stop was in 2011 and he doesn’t get the benefit of 2015’s Rodriguez

NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

The search of defendant’s person at the jail after his arrest was valid as an inventory search. State v. Garcia, 302 Neb. 406 (Mar. 8, 2019). “As set forth above, the undersigned does not agree with Defendant that the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

D.N.M.: Citizen informants saw shooting, and video surveillance caught image of def’s car at the time, and that was PC for arrest

Citizen informants saw a shooting from a vehicle and area video surveillance caught an image of defendant’s car. Police looked, and he was convicted felon. There was thus probable cause for defendant’s arrest. United States v. Cotto, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Citizen informants saw shooting, and video surveillance caught image of def’s car at the time, and that was PC for arrest

S.D.Fla.: There is no constitutional right of a defendant to testify at a suppression hearing

The right to testify at a trial doesn’t also mean that a defendant has a constitutional right to testify at a suppression hearing. Here, defendant wasn’t even present at the suppression hearing. The court finds that defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: There is no constitutional right of a defendant to testify at a suppression hearing

CA8: Arguable probable cause for arrest gives QI

“The totality of the circumstances at the time of the arrest, as described above, were sufficient for Svajgl to believe that Nader had committed or was committing the offense of possessing child pornography.” Arguable probable cause is all that’s required … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Arguable probable cause for arrest gives QI

D.Ariz.: Carpenter doesn’t change the third-party doctrine as to IP information

Carpenter doesn’t change the third-party doctrine as to IP information. United States v. McCutchin, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36811 (D. Ariz. Mar. 7, 2019). The affidavits “are somewhat thin,” but this is deferential, not de novo, review, and, while this … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Carpenter doesn’t change the third-party doctrine as to IP information

N.D.Ill.: Chicago Sun-Times gets access to SW affidavit briefly accidently unsealed on PACER under common law right of access to judicial records

The Chicago Sun-Times got access on PACER to a search warrant affidavit that was filed and briefly not sealed. They opened and copied it before it was sealed. Now they seek access to the file. The court finds that the … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Chicago Sun-Times gets access to SW affidavit briefly accidently unsealed on PACER under common law right of access to judicial records

FL2: State raises standing for first time on appeal; remanded so issue can be developed

The trial court suppressed on a violation of the curtilage, and the state raises standing for the first time on appeal. The court lets it do so, but remands for another suppression hearing to develop the facts. State v. Pettis, … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on FL2: State raises standing for first time on appeal; remanded so issue can be developed

FL1: Entry into def’s backyard for “strong chemical smell” was without showing exigency and suppressed

Police entered defendant’s backyard based on a call about a strong chemical smell. He was grinding glass with a heavy tool. They saw two women and another man visible inside the shed. They ordered him out and then got defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL1: Entry into def’s backyard for “strong chemical smell” was without showing exigency and suppressed

MA applies “foregone conclusion” test to determine def could be compelled to provide password for cell phone

Massachusetts applies the “foregone conclusion” test to whether forcing defendant to enter the password on his cell phone to search it violates the Fifth Amendment. The court concludes that defendant’s possession of the phone and admission it was his and … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on MA applies “foregone conclusion” test to determine def could be compelled to provide password for cell phone

IL: State did not satisfy foregone conclusion test to get cell phone password

The state did not satisfy the foregone conclusion test to get access to defendant’s password on his cell phone. People v. Spicer, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 129, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 129 (Mar. 7, 2019):

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on IL: State did not satisfy foregone conclusion test to get cell phone password

E.D.Mich.: Not IAC to not have challenged CSLI in 2014

It wasn’t ineffective assistance for defense counsel to not have filed a motion to suppress 2014 CSLI. United States v. Littles, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34359 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2019).* In this 2255, defense counsel was not shown to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Not IAC to not have challenged CSLI in 2014

OH8: Stop for flashing high beams was mistake of law and objectively reasonable under Heien

The state concedes that one flashing his high beams for one second twice 14 seconds apart at a vehicle in front of him for not moving is not a violation of the statute for unnecessarily driving on high beams. Nevertheless, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH8: Stop for flashing high beams was mistake of law and objectively reasonable under Heien

D.V.I.: “Premises” includes the curtilage

The premises for a search warrant includes the curtilage, and drugs found hidden outside the house on the curtilage just a few feet from the house were properly seized. United States v. Dowling, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34956 (D. V.I. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.V.I.: “Premises” includes the curtilage

D.Ore.: Seizing house title records from house officers already had copies of wasn’t overbroad; it shows control

The search warrant was not overbroad because officers seized title records on the property that they already apparently had copies of. It shows control. United States v. Cramer, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34959 (D. Ore. Mar. 5, 2019). There is … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Seizing house title records from house officers already had copies of wasn’t overbroad; it shows control

D.Mont.: Federal telephonic SW not subject to suppression without bad faith

The stop, as told to defendant, was for a traffic violation, but there was reasonable suspicion for drug trafficking considering all that the officers knew. Therefore, using a drug dog was reasonable because a drug investigation was legally supported. Use … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Federal telephonic SW not subject to suppression without bad faith

N.D.N.Y.: Even if def accused drug dealer’s alleged cover business was omitted from affidavit, there still was PC

The officers lack of complete detail to fully explain defendant’s version that he might have had a lawful explanation for what he was doing doesn’t rise to the high bar of a Franks violation. In addition, it’s not uncommon for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Even if def accused drug dealer’s alleged cover business was omitted from affidavit, there still was PC

CA9: CSLI warrant was issued without PC, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE should not apply

The government’s pre-Carpenter search warrant for CSLI was issued without probable cause, but it wasn’t so deficient that the good faith exception should not apply. United States v. Elmore, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 6507 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2019):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA9: CSLI warrant was issued without PC, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE should not apply

W.D.Mo.: Def had standing in a truck he was loaned

Defendant has standing in his daughter’s truck because he showed that she let him use it. The officer’s mistake of law concerning the expiration date of the vehicle’s license was reasonable. “Month of expiration” under Missouri law isn’t obvious. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def had standing in a truck he was loaned