Monthly Archives: October 2018

VT: A CI who is already in trouble with the police has an interest in truthfulness, and thus is likely more reliable

Statements against penal interest by CIs that are already in trouble are logically going to hurt the CI more if they turn out to be false, so the CI has an interest in being truthful. Reliability may thus be inferred … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VT: A CI who is already in trouble with the police has an interest in truthfulness, and thus is likely more reliable

PA: Request for consent to search by two officers with no dog present was not consent to a dog sniff

Defendant’s consent to two officers to conduct a search of his car didn’t extend to a dog sniff, too, because there wasn’t a dog there at the time, and that would be the common understanding. Commonwealth v. Valdivia, 2018 Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Request for consent to search by two officers with no dog present was not consent to a dog sniff

D.Minn.: Officer’s affidavit showed PC that clothing or proceeds of robbery would be at def’s home seven weeks after robber

This search warrant in bank robbery case wasn’t stale when it was issued about seven weeks after the robbery for defendant’s home. Defendant had been identified as the robber, and the affidavit showed a reasonable probability, based on officer experience, … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Officer’s affidavit showed PC that clothing or proceeds of robbery would be at def’s home seven weeks after robber

E.D.Mich.: Drugs don’t have to be forensically tested after a controlled buy for there to be PC

The CI was corroborated and the totality gives probable cause. The fact that the drugs were not tested prior to the search warrant doesn’t undermine the probable cause or good faith because the officer could tell what it probably was. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Drugs don’t have to be forensically tested after a controlled buy for there to be PC

OH6: Leaving house to do a drug deal and going back home right after is inference drugs at home

The affiant’s allegation that defendant left his house to conduct drug deals then returned there right afterward creates a reasonable inference that drugs are kept in the house. Thus, there was probable cause for the search warrant. State v. Pettaway, … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Inventory, Nexus | Comments Off on OH6: Leaving house to do a drug deal and going back home right after is inference drugs at home

OH2: Misd arrest warrant permits reasonable entry under Steagald

The officer here found an outstanding misdemeanor arrest warrant for defendant, and a probable address where she may be living with her boyfriend. The address was an apartment building with 5-6 apartments, and the officer asked around and went to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on OH2: Misd arrest warrant permits reasonable entry under Steagald

IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door

IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door because an apartment is still a “house” under the Fourth Amendment, and a different rule is unfair. An apartment dweller’s curtilage is his or her … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door

ME: Describing stolen tools by color and make was certainly particular as it could get

Stolen tools were described in the search warrant by color and make, and this was not unconstitutionally vague in the description just because other brands might have the same color scheme. “In this case, the search warrants identified the items … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ME: Describing stolen tools by color and make was certainly particular as it could get

GA: Remanded for findings on whether def consented to forensics search of his cell phone

Defendant was on the state sex offender registry, and he was subject to compliance checks. Six officers from two agencies came to his house for his compliance review and they talked to him. They were lawfully on the premises under … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Military searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: Remanded for findings on whether def consented to forensics search of his cell phone

S.D.N.Y.: Court can’t return property under Rule 41(g) after civil forfeiture starts

Once a civil forfeiture proceeding has started, the court loses jurisdiction to consider a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property. United States v. Paulino, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176893 (S.D. N.Y. Oct. 16, 2018). The seizure of defendant’s cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Court can’t return property under Rule 41(g) after civil forfeiture starts

E.D.Mich.: City DPW employee had REP in backpack in a city work vehicle; city couldn’t consent to its search

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her backpack in a city work vehicle despite a city policy that city work vehicles can’t be used for illegal purposes. Consent to search the backpack could not be given by defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: City DPW employee had REP in backpack in a city work vehicle; city couldn’t consent to its search

D.S.D.: SW affidavit attachments referred to in affidavit and were used at the pre-search briefing to narrow the search

The application for the search warrant could have been more clear, but it was still apparent that the attachments were incorporated, and they completed the probable cause showing. Moreover, the attachments were used in the pre-search briefing of the officers … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.S.D.: SW affidavit attachments referred to in affidavit and were used at the pre-search briefing to narrow the search

N.D.Ind.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require any specifics be held by officer making the stop

Under the collective knowledge doctrine, the officer actually making the stop doesn’t have to know much of anything that the officers with knowledge know. Nothing needs to be communicated, other than the identity of the person or car stopped. There … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Collective knowledge | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require any specifics be held by officer making the stop

MI: Controlled buys and corroborated CI was PC

The trial court erred in suppressing the search under the search warrant. There were controlled buys and a corroborated informant, and that was enough for probable cause. People v. Higgins, 2018 Mich. App. LEXIS 3355 (Oct. 18, 2018). Defendant’s right … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Controlled buys and corroborated CI was PC

D.S.D.: Community caretaking function permitted search of unconscious person’s bag for source of his condition

Police responding to a medical emergency found defendant unconscious in his bathroom with a belt tourniquet at his arm and a brown liquid in a syringe. That was not a sign of diabetes shock. It was reasonable under Eighth Circuit … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Community caretaking function permitted search of unconscious person’s bag for source of his condition

CO: Once a dog alerts on a car, there is PC, and putting dog in car wasn’t unreasonable

Once a dog alerted on a car during a stop that was valid up to that time, putting the dog inside the car wasn’t unreasonable. The officers had probable cause at that point. People v. Bailey, 2018 CO 84 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CO: Once a dog alerts on a car, there is PC, and putting dog in car wasn’t unreasonable

CA9: Casual conversation with a motorist isn’t barred by Rodriguez despite officer’s motive

Casual conversation with a motorist during a traffic stop isn’t prohibited by Rodriguez even though the officer is hoping to pick up on something supporting reasonable suspicion. United States v. Kash, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29057 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Casual conversation with a motorist isn’t barred by Rodriguez despite officer’s motive

E.D.Ky.: Pleading a constitutional violation without saying how preserves nothing for review

“Cruz next present a series of direct challenges, obviously hoping one will stick. He generally asserts that his ‘conviction and sentence are violative of the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution.’ (DE 32, at 7). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Pleading a constitutional violation without saying how preserves nothing for review

N.D.Miss.: Officer’s credibility on cause for stop fails because the tag light was working and he couldn’t see in car

Officer’s testimony varied sufficiently from his reports of his reasonable suspicion for the stop and detention that it’s just unreliable. Motion to suppress granted. It apparently started with the justification for the stop as inoperable tag lights [how many times … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Officer’s credibility on cause for stop fails because the tag light was working and he couldn’t see in car

NC: Officers doing a knock-and-talk didn’t unreasonably “linger” in violation of Jardines

Officers could enter defendant’s driveway to conduct a knock-and-talk, and they didn’t “linger” long in violation of Jardines. They smelled marijuana coming from the garage, and that was sufficient to get a search warrant. Defendant’s argument about the sign on … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on NC: Officers doing a knock-and-talk didn’t unreasonably “linger” in violation of Jardines