Daily Archives: October 15, 2018

CA11: Work-related injuries don’t necessarily translate into OSHA violations; records request quashed as overbroad

Existence of work-related injuries or illnesses do not translate directly into reasonable suspicion that an OSHA violation occurred. The district court was correct in quashing the inspection warrant for lack of a proper showing, without prejudice to OSHA establishing the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA11: Work-related injuries don’t necessarily translate into OSHA violations; records request quashed as overbroad

NYTimes: How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case Investigations

NYTimes: How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case Investigations by Heather Murphy: Fifteen murder and sexual assault cases have been solved since April with a single genealogy website. This is how GEDmatch went from a casual side project … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on NYTimes: How an Unlikely Family History Website Transformed Cold Case Investigations

WaPo: Opinion: Little Rock’s dangerous and illegal drug war

WaPo: Opinion: Little Rock’s dangerous and illegal drug war by Radley Balko (with security video of the raid) (and this is a product of Hudson v. Michigan, which we can thank SCOTUS for):

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Opinion: Little Rock’s dangerous and illegal drug war

OH2: Motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot

A motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot. State v. Housley, 2018-Ohio-4140, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 4467 (2d Dist. Oct. 12, 2018). There was no Franks violation. Officers got permission from a child to … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH2: Motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot

DE: Officer’s training and experience in intoxicated drivers was relevant and significant to the PC showing

The officer’s training and experience in intoxicated drivers was relevant and significant to the probable cause showing in the affidavit for defendant’s BAC. He was not a mere layperson making an observation as defendant says. State v. Law, 2018 Del. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: Officer’s training and experience in intoxicated drivers was relevant and significant to the PC showing

DE: Motion deadlines are there for a reason; the defense doesn’t show “exceptional circumstances” to overcome the deadline

There are motion deadlines for a reason. Former defense counsel reviewed the file and didn’t see a basis for a motion to suppress. Another defense lawyer came in and did. The excuse for getting around the deadline is late disclosure … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Motion deadlines are there for a reason; the defense doesn’t show “exceptional circumstances” to overcome the deadline