Daily Archives: October 19, 2018

MI: Controlled buys and corroborated CI was PC

The trial court erred in suppressing the search under the search warrant. There were controlled buys and a corroborated informant, and that was enough for probable cause. People v. Higgins, 2018 Mich. App. LEXIS 3355 (Oct. 18, 2018). Defendant’s right … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Controlled buys and corroborated CI was PC

D.S.D.: Community caretaking function permitted search of unconscious person’s bag for source of his condition

Police responding to a medical emergency found defendant unconscious in his bathroom with a belt tourniquet at his arm and a brown liquid in a syringe. That was not a sign of diabetes shock. It was reasonable under Eighth Circuit … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Community caretaking function permitted search of unconscious person’s bag for source of his condition

CO: Once a dog alerts on a car, there is PC, and putting dog in car wasn’t unreasonable

Once a dog alerted on a car during a stop that was valid up to that time, putting the dog inside the car wasn’t unreasonable. The officers had probable cause at that point. People v. Bailey, 2018 CO 84 (Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CO: Once a dog alerts on a car, there is PC, and putting dog in car wasn’t unreasonable

CA9: Casual conversation with a motorist isn’t barred by Rodriguez despite officer’s motive

Casual conversation with a motorist during a traffic stop isn’t prohibited by Rodriguez even though the officer is hoping to pick up on something supporting reasonable suspicion. United States v. Kash, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29057 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Casual conversation with a motorist isn’t barred by Rodriguez despite officer’s motive

E.D.Ky.: Pleading a constitutional violation without saying how preserves nothing for review

“Cruz next present a series of direct challenges, obviously hoping one will stick. He generally asserts that his ‘conviction and sentence are violative of the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution.’ (DE 32, at 7). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Pleading a constitutional violation without saying how preserves nothing for review