Monthly Archives: August 2018

WaPo: Google refused an order to release huge amounts of data. Will other companies bow under pressure? [Govt seeking tracking information from phone apps]

WaPo: Google refused an order to release huge amounts of data. Will other companies bow under pressure? by Deanna Paul:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Google refused an order to release huge amounts of data. Will other companies bow under pressure? [Govt seeking tracking information from phone apps]

IA: Raising arms on request for patdown was “acquiescence to a claim of authority”

Defendant did not consent to a patdown by raising his arms–it was merely acquiescence to a claim of authority. State v. Frost, 2018 Iowa App. LEXIS 759 (Aug. 15, 2018):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on IA: Raising arms on request for patdown was “acquiescence to a claim of authority”

CA7: City’s use of “smart meter” is a search, but it is reasonable because it’s not for criminal purposes and law enforcement never knows

The use of a smart meter to collect energy consumption in homes is a search under the Fourth Amendment under Kyllo. It is, however, a reasonable search because it is purely for the use of the power company and city … Continue reading

Posted in Search, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: City’s use of “smart meter” is a search, but it is reasonable because it’s not for criminal purposes and law enforcement never knows

D.Me.: Where a couple shared a closet, her apparent authority extended to whole closet, not just his side

Defendant and his girlfriend shared a closet where they were staying, and she had apparent authority to consent to a search of the whole closet, not just her side of it. United States v. Lawson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137966 … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Open fields | Comments Off on D.Me.: Where a couple shared a closet, her apparent authority extended to whole closet, not just his side

DE: Def counsel was not ineffective for not arguing obvious typo on date justified suppression because it didn’t

The search warrant affidavit said August 3, 2015, but August was typed and the 3 written in. It’s clear from all the testimony that it was issued September 3, and the “August” wasn’t corrected. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel was not ineffective for not arguing obvious typo on date justified suppression because it didn’t

cnn.com: Police use Taser on 87-year-old woman cutting dandelions with a knife

cnn.com: Police use Taser on 87-year-old woman cutting dandelions with a knife by Keith Allen: (CNN)An 87-year-old grandmother using a knife to cut dandelions in the woods near her rural Georgia home last week was taken down by a police … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on cnn.com: Police use Taser on 87-year-old woman cutting dandelions with a knife

CA11: CSLI order was based on six week old precedent from this court; Davis GFE applies

This court held six weeks before the government obtained its SCA order for defendant’s CSLI that was the legal way to do it. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. “Here, the Government complied with the requirements of the SCA in … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA11: CSLI order was based on six week old precedent from this court; Davis GFE applies

OH9: Dog sniff of a car in motel parking lot not a search

A dog sniff of a car on a motel parking lot was reasonable and didn’t require reasonable suspicion because there was no stop. State v. Bryner, 2018-Ohio-3215, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 3473 (9th Dist. Aug. 13, 2018). Police had a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on OH9: Dog sniff of a car in motel parking lot not a search

CA2: Motion to reopen suppression hearing for alleged IAC was subject to abuse of discretion; not abused here

Defendant attempted to reopen his suppression hearing based on alleged ineffective assistance by former counsel. The trial court denied the motion based on a credibility determination of the witnesses. The place to bring the IAC claim is in post-conviction. The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA2: Motion to reopen suppression hearing for alleged IAC was subject to abuse of discretion; not abused here

E.D.Va.: When officer takes your license to run it, you’re seized

“Officer Myers’ instruction to ‘hang tight’ while he ran Defendant’s driver’s license [and had it in hand], would lead a reasonable person in Defendant’s shoes not to feel free to leave. Thus, the consensual encounter became a seizure under the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: When officer takes your license to run it, you’re seized

W.D.N.C.: When they had PC for rural house, entry to freeze situation was reasonable when magistrate was two hours away

After police stopped a car suspected in drug deals, they learned that the drugs came from a particular address which was used as a distribution point. They developed probable cause for the house. They were two hours away from a … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: When they had PC for rural house, entry to freeze situation was reasonable when magistrate was two hours away

E.D.Mo.: Federal SW for cell phone after private search then state SW was on independent source

Defendant’s cell phone was first the subject of a private search, and then a police search. The police search exceeded the scope of the private search, and that led to a state issued search warrant. The state search warrant was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Federal SW for cell phone after private search then state SW was on independent source

N.D.Iowa: Inventory appears only a pretext for criminal search

Officer’s failure to follow inventory policy here created the strong inference the inventory was really a pretext for a criminal search, and the inventory is suppressed. United States v. Davis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137083 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 14, 2018) … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Inventory appears only a pretext for criminal search

msn.com: Chicago cops pointed guns at children while raiding the wrong address, lawsuit says

msn.com: Chicago cops pointed guns at children while raiding the wrong address, lawsuit says by Tony Briscoe:

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on msn.com: Chicago cops pointed guns at children while raiding the wrong address, lawsuit says

OH2: Officer’s good faith mistake, if it was one, that def possessed a concealed weapon (a long sword), bars application of the exclusionary rule [court erroneously shifts burden]

Police got a call about a man wielding a sword, and they stopped defendant. There was probable cause for him possessing a concealed long sword [how?]. Even if the officer was wrong, it wasn’t really wrong. “Short contends that Officer … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on OH2: Officer’s good faith mistake, if it was one, that def possessed a concealed weapon (a long sword), bars application of the exclusionary rule [court erroneously shifts burden]

OH11: Not objecting to police officer following def into hotel room to retrieve paperwork was implied consent

Police came to defendant’s motel room door and knocked without saying who they were. They asked about a stolen truck defendant had, and he turned and went in to get paperwork, and the officer followed him. Defendant never objected to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH11: Not objecting to police officer following def into hotel room to retrieve paperwork was implied consent

CA7: CI was a co-conspirator, and corroboration was required

This § 1983 case over a state court search warrant and search essentially seeks to relitigate in federal court the issuance of the warrant, which is not the prerogative of a federal court. Instead, the court finds corroboration of the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: CI was a co-conspirator, and corroboration was required

OH11: Specific and articulable facts, including bullet casings in front of house and bullet holes in house, supported an entry an hour later

“[T]he officers had a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts to search for injured people” based on bullet casings in the street and bullet holes in the house even when the waited an hour. They didn’t have to … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH11: Specific and articulable facts, including bullet casings in front of house and bullet holes in house, supported an entry an hour later

D.P.R.: The fact the police statements weren’t the same doesn’t mean there’s a Franks violation or no PC

The officer’s statement wasn’t inconsistent with the reports of others and didn’t support a Franks claim. It’s entirely possible that the reports of others were all true and merely reported different observations than the officers. Therefore, no Franks violation. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.P.R.: The fact the police statements weren’t the same doesn’t mean there’s a Franks violation or no PC

NJ: Dash cams videos not “records required to be kept” for FOIA but remanded for whether there is a common law right of access

Dash cam videos are not public records under the state open records law because they are not required by law to be kept. There might, however, be a common law right of access, and the case is remanded for a … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on NJ: Dash cams videos not “records required to be kept” for FOIA but remanded for whether there is a common law right of access