Daily Archives: August 18, 2018

IA: Raising arms on request for patdown was “acquiescence to a claim of authority”

Defendant did not consent to a patdown by raising his arms–it was merely acquiescence to a claim of authority. State v. Frost, 2018 Iowa App. LEXIS 759 (Aug. 15, 2018):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on IA: Raising arms on request for patdown was “acquiescence to a claim of authority”

CA7: City’s use of “smart meter” is a search, but it is reasonable because it’s not for criminal purposes and law enforcement never knows

The use of a smart meter to collect energy consumption in homes is a search under the Fourth Amendment under Kyllo. It is, however, a reasonable search because it is purely for the use of the power company and city … Continue reading

Posted in Search, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: City’s use of “smart meter” is a search, but it is reasonable because it’s not for criminal purposes and law enforcement never knows

D.Me.: Where a couple shared a closet, her apparent authority extended to whole closet, not just his side

Defendant and his girlfriend shared a closet where they were staying, and she had apparent authority to consent to a search of the whole closet, not just her side of it. United States v. Lawson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137966 … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Open fields | Comments Off on D.Me.: Where a couple shared a closet, her apparent authority extended to whole closet, not just his side

DE: Def counsel was not ineffective for not arguing obvious typo on date justified suppression because it didn’t

The search warrant affidavit said August 3, 2015, but August was typed and the 3 written in. It’s clear from all the testimony that it was issued September 3, and the “August” wasn’t corrected. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel was not ineffective for not arguing obvious typo on date justified suppression because it didn’t