Daily Archives: August 29, 2018

OH5: Ptf stated claim for invasion of privacy that private drug tester had to observe genitalia

Plaintiff stated a claim for invasion of privacy that a private drug tester had to observe their genitals in a drug test. Lunsford v. Sterilite of Ohio, 2018-Ohio-3437, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 3725 (5th Dist. Aug. 27, 2018). “Failure to … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH5: Ptf stated claim for invasion of privacy that private drug tester had to observe genitalia

GA: Trial court failed to consider state’s alternative ground to sustain search; remanded

Defendant filed a motion to suppress and that put the state on notice that it had to prove the ordinance under which it prosecutes. The state failed to prove it up, but its backup argument was that the officer relied … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Trial court failed to consider state’s alternative ground to sustain search; remanded

D.Minn.: USMJ who issues SW doesn’t have to recuse from deciding motion to suppress

The USMJ who issued the search warrant doesn’t need to recuse from deciding on a motion to suppress that warrant. “The Court also concludes that Strieff controls the analysis of Defendant’s challenge to his stop in Rock Island, Illinois. In … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Minn.: USMJ who issues SW doesn’t have to recuse from deciding motion to suppress

E.D.La.: The statements in the affidavit were exaggerations rather than outright falsehoods, but PC was there on the totality

“To the extent that the statements identified by Defendant are inaccurate, most are exaggerations of the truth. While the Government, and this Court, lament that the affidavit was written in terms of absolutes, the removal of the statements identified by … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.La.: The statements in the affidavit were exaggerations rather than outright falsehoods, but PC was there on the totality

M.D.La.: The govt alleged the house was abandoned, and def had the burden to prove standing and failed

“The parties’ briefing and the testimony at the hearing further suggest that the house was abandoned and that any search occurred away from Defendant’s ‘residence of record’ or an ‘additional residence on Osceola Street.’ … Contrary to a suggestion in … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.La.: The govt alleged the house was abandoned, and def had the burden to prove standing and failed

NE: Court with jurisdiction over criminal case has jurisdiction to return property seized

When a criminal case is over, the defendant is entitled to return of non-contraband seized property from the court with jurisdiction over the criminal case. In an IFP case, the court declines to say that he pled wrong in seeking … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NE: Court with jurisdiction over criminal case has jurisdiction to return property seized

N.D.Okla.: Investigative detention at gunpoint isn’t per se unreasonable

An investigative detention at gunpoint isn’t per se unreasonable. Here, defendant was told to stay in the car and he didn’t, and the officer justifiably drew his weapon for self-protection. This wasn’t unreasonable under the circumstances. “In addition, over the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Investigative detention at gunpoint isn’t per se unreasonable

W.D.Pa.: This SW directed at a place and things, not just persons

“Defendant’s argument that 1335 Geyer Avenue was indeed his home, but that police did not know it was his home, thus fails. Additionally, ‘search warrants are directed, not at persons, but at property where there is probable cause to believe … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: This SW directed at a place and things, not just persons

N.D.Ala.: No REP in bank records under still settled law

“Petitioner argues that the IRS’s summonses to Bank of America and Regions Bank violate his Fourth Amendment rights. … The Eleventh Circuit recently considered and rejected a Fourth Amendment challenge to an IRS summons directed towards a bank because the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: No REP in bank records under still settled law

ABAJ: Class action filed against Google over location tracking

ABAJ: Class action filed against Google over location tracking by Jason Tashea:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABAJ: Class action filed against Google over location tracking