Daily Archives: February 29, 2016

E.D.N.Y.: Apple can’t be forced to unlock an iPhone; not the California case

Apple wins first encryption case in E.D.N.Y. Court refuses to order phone opened, via techcrunch. In re Order Requiring Apple, Inc. to Assist in the Execution of a Search Warrant, 15-MC-1902 (JO) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2016)( (USMJ Orenstein):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Apple can’t be forced to unlock an iPhone; not the California case

NYTimes: New York Police Faulted by Agency for Unlawful Searches

NYTimes: New York Police Faulted by Agency for Unlawful Searches by Al Baker:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Police misconduct | Comments Off on NYTimes: New York Police Faulted by Agency for Unlawful Searches

Washington Free Beacon: 2002 Letter Lays Out Bush’s Legal Authority For Conducting Surveillance After 9/11; Yoo letter declassified

Washington Free Beacon: 2002 Letter Lays Out Bush’s Legal Authority For Conducting Surveillance After 9/11 [Yoo letter declassified] by Morgan Chalfant:

Posted in National security | Comments Off on Washington Free Beacon: 2002 Letter Lays Out Bush’s Legal Authority For Conducting Surveillance After 9/11; Yoo letter declassified

Global Research: NSA Spying, Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: The Views of U.S. Presidential Candidates

Global Research: NSA Spying, Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: The Views of U.S. Presidential Candidates by Michael T. Bucci: What are the positions of U.S. presidential candidates on NSA domestic spying, personal privacy and the Fourth Amendment?

Posted in National security | Comments Off on Global Research: NSA Spying, Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: The Views of U.S. Presidential Candidates

CA2: Florence on jail strip searches was an intervening change in law allowing undoing a prior order

Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington was an intervening change in law that permitted the district court to undo a jail strip search class action judgment. In re Nassau County Strip Search Cases, 2016 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on CA2: Florence on jail strip searches was an intervening change in law allowing undoing a prior order

NE: Failure to announce entry to execute a misd warrant on ptf’s grandson survived summary judgment; interests rule serves are important

The trial court erred in granting summary judgment for officers who entered plaintiff’s home to arrest her grandson without announcing and with force. A question of fact is presented on the failure to announce, and it serves important interests. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce | Comments Off on NE: Failure to announce entry to execute a misd warrant on ptf’s grandson survived summary judgment; interests rule serves are important

D.Conn.: As much as everybody hates the “third party doctrine,” it’s still good law, and CSLI accessible by subpoena

The government obtained 22 days of defendant’s CSLI information by subpoena and not search warrant, and, as much as the third party doctrine is despised by the commentators, it remains good law today. United States v. Chavez, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Conn.: As much as everybody hates the “third party doctrine,” it’s still good law, and CSLI accessible by subpoena

IN: State failed to even attempt to justify inventory; reversed

Defendant was arrested with his car on a parking lot for driving on a suspended DL, and the car had a broken windshield and bumper. The state failed to prove justification for an inventory, and it had the burden. Wilford … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IN: State failed to even attempt to justify inventory; reversed

WI: Exigency permitted warrantless blood draw of apparent heroin OD, even though he was given antidote

Officers and paramedics were called by friends to a man not breathing in a house. Defendant was found and it had signs of a drug overdose. His blood was drawn to test it, and he was given an injection of … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WI: Exigency permitted warrantless blood draw of apparent heroin OD, even though he was given antidote

CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

Execution of a white collar search warrant by officers of the SBA and IRS with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens blaring was not unreasonable as a matter of law. Policy required they be armed during the raid. While a couple … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

IA: Probation pre-consent to search sex offender’s cell phone was valid

Defendant’s probation search conditions included consent to search his property, and his cell phone was properly searched. “An additional consideration supports our conclusion Barth consented to the search of his cellular phone for non-investigatory purposes. Barth was participating in the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on IA: Probation pre-consent to search sex offender’s cell phone was valid

E.D.N.Y.: Losing one’s cell phone at the scene of the crime is a loss of any reasonable expectation of privacy in it

A defendant who loses his cell phone at the scene of a crime has abandoned it by not safeguarding his privacy. This was 2009, and, besides, Riley doesn’t apply to abandoned phones. United States v. Quashie, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Losing one’s cell phone at the scene of the crime is a loss of any reasonable expectation of privacy in it

Cal.2d: Even if Civil Code § 56.26 on medical record privacy had been violated, evidence not excludable in medical disciplinary proceeding

Even if Civil Code § 56.26 on medical record privacy had been violated, it would not exclude evidence in a medical board proceeding for violating billing standards. The subpoena is enforced as limited by time period. Fett v. Medical Bd. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.2d: Even if Civil Code § 56.26 on medical record privacy had been violated, evidence not excludable in medical disciplinary proceeding