Daily Archives: February 16, 2016

FedScoop: Spies’ lawyer: Third party doctrine not an ‘off switch’ for privacy

FedScoop: Spies’ lawyer: Third party doctrine not an ‘off switch’ for privacy by Jeremy Snow: It’s important to distinguish between the different types of disclosure to third parties, said Robert Litt, general counsel for Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. … Continue reading

Posted in National security, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on FedScoop: Spies’ lawyer: Third party doctrine not an ‘off switch’ for privacy

FISC: New FREEDOM Act had a 180 grace period for surveillance

“‘Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose,’ well, at least for 180 days. This application presents the question whether the recently-enacted USA FREEDOM Act, in amending Title V of FISA, ended the bulk collection of telephone metadata. The short … Continue reading

Posted in National security | Comments Off on FISC: New FREEDOM Act had a 180 grace period for surveillance

IA: State SCt hasn’t departed from holding exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revo proceedings so this court can’t

While the state search and seizure provision is subject to broader interpretation in Iowa, the state supreme court hasn’t deviated from the rule that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings, so this court is bound by … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Seizure | Comments Off on IA: State SCt hasn’t departed from holding exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revo proceedings so this court can’t

TN: Citizen informant’s call describing vehicle and LPN involved in apparent drug deal was RS

Citizen informant’s call that a neighbor was dealing drugs out of his house and describing the comings and goings and the LPN and description of the last car was reasonable suspicion for that car’s stop. State v. Foster, 2016 Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Citizen informant’s call describing vehicle and LPN involved in apparent drug deal was RS

CO: “Appurtenances” in a search warrant included a shed out back

A search warrant for weapons involved in a shooting included the house and “appurtenances” and that included a shed out back. A sawed-off shotgun was found, and that led to a separate charge. There’s no constitutional right to possess a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: “Appurtenances” in a search warrant included a shed out back

DE: Threat to take blood by force if necessary made consent invalid where it was unjustified to say so

The officer’s threat to use force to get a blood draw when the defendant hadn’t done a thing to justify that comment made the blood draw involuntary. State v. Cullen, 2016 Del. Super. LEXIS 68 (Feb. 9, 2016):

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on DE: Threat to take blood by force if necessary made consent invalid where it was unjustified to say so

WI: Where there was a bona fide community caretaking entry because of blood outside and inside a house, the smell of marijuana didn’t negate the exigency

The warrantless search of defendant’s home including a room with a locked, blood-spattered door, was reasonable under the community caretaking function. In light of all the facts that an officer had to consider, the blood outside the house, inside the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probable cause | Comments Off on WI: Where there was a bona fide community caretaking entry because of blood outside and inside a house, the smell of marijuana didn’t negate the exigency