Daily Archives: February 15, 2016

Cato: Justice Scalia: Underappreciated Fourth Amendment Defender

Cato: Justice Scalia: Underappreciated Fourth Amendment Defender by Jonathan Blanks: In addition to his many judicial bona fides, Justice Antonin Scalia was an underappreciated defender of the Fourth Amendment. With his typical thoroughness and deep textualism that reshaped American judging, … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cato: Justice Scalia: Underappreciated Fourth Amendment Defender

Book on sale 25% off through Tuesday midnight

Search and Seizure, Fifth Edition Print Book Format: $473.00 Your Price: $354.75

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Book on sale 25% off through Tuesday midnight

D.Nev.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid; warrant came later

The court’s credibility determination is that defendant did not revoke his consent after admittedly consenting. The seizure of his cell phone incident to arrest was valid because there was reason to believe there was evidence in it. Thus, the later … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest was valid; warrant came later

NYTimes: How America Was Lost

NYTimes: How America Was Lost by Paul Krugman: Once upon a time, the death of a Supreme Court justice wouldn’t have brought America to the edge of constitutional crisis. But that was a different country, with a very different Republican … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYTimes: How America Was Lost

TN: Crime scene investigators arrived right behind the police to a shooting call; crime scene search was reasonable under Mincey

Police received a call to a shooting, and people at the scene were shouting “Officer Shaffer pulled into the driveway and blocked the car so that it could not leave. The driver of the car stopped, got out, and yelled … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TN: Crime scene investigators arrived right behind the police to a shooting call; crime scene search was reasonable under Mincey

W.D.Pa.: No reasonable expectation of privacy in jail calls

Defendant’s motion to quash subpoenas for his jail telephone calls is denied. He was on notice by the inmate handbook and notices by the phone and during the calls, sometimes twice, that the calls would be recorded. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: No reasonable expectation of privacy in jail calls