CA8: Execution of white collar SW with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens wasn’t unreasonable

Execution of a white collar search warrant by officers of the SBA and IRS with bulletproof vests, sidearms, and sirens blaring was not unreasonable as a matter of law. Policy required they be armed during the raid. While a couple of employees were pushed during the raid, the raid supervisors weren’t shown to have authorized it. Summary judgment for government affirmed. Mountain Pure, LLC v. Roberts, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3290 (8th Cir. Feb. 25, 2016).

Defendant was the victim of a robbery attempt and shooting at apartment door caught on video. The robber got away. The police had consent to use a dual purpose dog in the common areas of the apartment building looking for the suspect, and there were shadows on the windows of the unoccupied first floor apartment. At the hospital, she signed a general consent to search for evidence related to the attack on her. She questioned the breadth of the consent form, and she was told it was to look for evidence of the shooting and one specific thing, and she agreed. In plain view was an open shopping bag with drugs in it. United States v. Hardy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23133 (D.N.H. Feb. 25, 2016).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.