Daily Archives: February 23, 2016

WaPo: Court: No First Amendment right to videorecord police unless you are challenging the police at the time

WaPo: Court: No First Amendment right to videorecord police unless you are challenging the police at the time by Eugene Volokh:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Court: No First Amendment right to videorecord police unless you are challenging the police at the time

CA5: Search issue reserved in conditional plea is a limitation, and issues not specified are abandoned

Defendant’s conditional plea reserved “the issue of the validity of the search warrant,” and it limits the appeal. Thus, issues of consent and probable cause are outside the issues reserved in the conditional plea and thus abandoned. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on CA5: Search issue reserved in conditional plea is a limitation, and issues not specified are abandoned

N.D.Okla: Material govt’s LEO witnesses to consent were so bad govt retracted their testimony, and search fails

The government realized when they called defendant’s estranged wife near the end of the suppression hearing about the alleged consent search of their house that “As the suppression hearing unfolded over the course of two days, the credibility of certain … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Okla: Material govt’s LEO witnesses to consent were so bad govt retracted their testimony, and search fails

NYTimes: Editorial: The Supreme Court and Police Searches

NYTimes: Editorial: The Supreme Court and Police Searches: Should incriminating evidence be used against a defendant if it was discovered in the course of an illegal police stop? That was the question before the Supreme Court on Monday, the first … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYTimes: Editorial: The Supreme Court and Police Searches